253
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

If he was cishet, I wonder if he'd still be in office?

[-] Albbi@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 day ago

Do people not go to jail anymore? If a normal person got caught with $200k from wire fraud they don't get asked nicely to give it back.

[-] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

Have you tried being born rich and influential?

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Laws for thee but not me.

[-] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

disgraced

Is it even possible to 'disgrace' a man this shameless?

[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 23 points 1 day ago

I thought Trump was going to make him the ambassador to Brazil but his check must have bounced.

[-] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

You get paid before you start?

[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 day ago

Trump works on contingency? No, money down.

He doesn't look disgraced in the thumbnail.

[-] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

He's the epitomy of that German word that means "face that looks punchable"

[-] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

He gets sentenced in February. Even if you're fake rich you get a different justice system apparently. But that's a perp walk I can't wait to peep.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 1 day ago

There was a video on the old site about a week ago with a New Yorker throwing coffee on him and yelling insults. It was magnificent.

[-] homesnatch@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

That was staged by Santos...

[-] mercphilby@discuss.online 3 points 1 day ago

You gotta hand it to the man. He saw an opportunity and he took it. He’s just bad at it. We can’t shame him, because we elected a better version of him.

[-] orcrist@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago

Of course we can shame him ... but he never cared about integrity.

[-] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I'd say he was pretty fucking good at it getting elected to the House in New York. But he was sloppy as the blowjob he gave that Amish dingus for his inbred dogs.

[-] mercphilby@discuss.online 2 points 20 hours ago

Wow, that’s a mouthful. 😅

this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2024
253 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19248 readers
1889 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS