309
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by JoBo@feddit.uk to c/politics@lemmy.world

The Streisand Effect is a wonderful thing.

"[T]hese bans target materials written by and about people of color or LGBTQ+ individuals, and even though a 2022 poll found that 70% of parents oppose them, they are continuing at a rapid rate.

"Now the Digital Public Library of America (DPLA) is trying to fight back. It recently launched the Banned Book Program, granting free nationwide access to books restricted in schools or libraries.

"It functions through GPS-based geo-targeting; by typing in your zip code, you are shown the complete list of titles prohibited in your area. Once you download the Palace e-reader app, these books are available to download."

all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] r_a_trip@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

We live in interesting times when the USA, the land of the free and home of the brave, has to turn to samizdat to circumvent censorship.

[-] fubo@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

To be fair, samizdat overcame much greater obstacles than a school library not carrying particular titles because of the ideological idiocy of the school board. The Soviets were much more, ah, comprehensive when it came to banning books.

[-] MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

The Soviets were much more, ah, comprehensive when it came to banning books.

Almost like comparing library curation to actual censorship has always been a dishonest comparison.

[-] MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

It's not fucking censorship. Nobody is stopping people from reading these books. It's literally just preventing schools from providing them. That's it.

[-] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Believe me, if they could totally suppress them, they would. This is just what they think they can get away with right now.

[-] MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I see no reason to believe you

[-] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

May wanna get an optometrist appointment then.

[-] MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Why? Because I don't see your delusions?

[-] zeroblood@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 year ago

I'm not American and know nothing about this, but shouldn't banning books be illegal cause of the freedom of speech amendment?

[-] affiliate@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

yes it should be illegal

[-] Technoguyfication@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

Yes. Now tell that to the republicans.

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Fascists don't care about laws.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

They’re kids, so they have no rights

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.one 12 points 1 year ago

I'm being gifted a Little Free Library for my birthday, I'm looking forward to celebrating "Banned Book Week" October 1st through 7th.

https://shop.littlefreelibrary.org/products/this-library-shares-banned-books-sign?variant=43484083945621

[-] Ertebolle@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Am I allowed to make a joke about France being bacon here or is that déclassé now?

[-] MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Am I supposed to care? Everyone was already allowed to do all this anyway.

[-] JoBo@feddit.uk 19 points 1 year ago

Yet you posted anyway. Odd.

[-] Lemmylefty@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Uh, check their post history. You may not want to engage with them.

[-] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

check their post history

Wow. It must be exhausting being so angry at so many thing all the time. I didn't see a single comment expressing a positive vibe.

[-] MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Lmao I'm not angry. Maybe you're just confused that I don't just jerk off every leftist I see?

[-] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

Sorry, was I talking to you?

[-] MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

If you want to talk about me without me responding, take it to a dm.

[-] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

Naah, free speech and all that.

Got anything positive to say?

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Got anything positive to say?

Of course he doesn't and never will.

[-] MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm sure mr. lemmylefty doesn't want anyone engaging with people who dissent

[-] MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

You clearly thought it was newsworthy that people can access things they already had access to. I wanted to see why you thought it was important

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You clearly thought it was newsworthy that people can access things they already had access to. I wanted to see why you thought it was important

Because it means people like you failed.

[-] JoBo@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My OP starts with a comment about the Streisand Effect. If you don't know what it is, you can look it up.

this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
309 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19858 readers
3056 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS