101
Holding back China's chipmaking progress is a fool’s errand, says U.S. Commerce Secretary | Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)
submitted 14 hours ago by schizoidman@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world
16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/50512886

all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 hours ago

A contributing factor in all of this is that US manufacturers have spent the better part of the last 30 years turning their engineering departments into glorified parts replacers. A complaint I have heard from nearly every electrical/electronics engineer that I've known is that "We don't design things anymore. Now we just spend most of our time trying to find replacements for chips that we can no longer get."

From what I can tell, from my very limited perspective, there has been a significant lack of investment in engineering capabilities and a resulting lack of innovation for a long time. As usual, short term thinking is expensive in the long run. We're only just beginning to find out how expensive.

[-] Galapagon@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 hours ago

I've tried explaining to people that I think the best way to fight globalization is a well educated population. Then the theory is, we'd be able to make more domestic advancements that other countries would have to try and keep up with.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago

So that's right up the alley of the incoming administration then?

[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 hours ago

No carrot. Only stick.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 30 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

It's pretty spot on. It takes years to get a fab up to speed, and they've been stealing US IP shipped over there for manufacturing for over a decade. They'll try to annex Taiwan, and the US will be fucked. Jokes on them though, because TSMC has remote self destructive capabilities for their operations.

[-] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

China will not invade Taiwan. They might try to invade a country like the Philippines, almost crash the world economy but more than anything their own country in the process and realize Taiwan is completely out of reach.

[-] EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

TSMC won’t destroy itself. If the US destroys TSMC on its way out, that will crush the global economy.

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

Man, I love how people give no agency to companies like this. Mainly because it shows they're entirely ignorant of the state of the world outside of their very limited knowledge and incorrect beliefs about it.

[-] HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 9 hours ago

It's a no-win for them.

They lose the war and pull the trigger, and everyone from the janitor on up is prosecuted by the PRC as saboteurs.

They win the war and have blown up the factory? Goodbye #1 export product.

Its only value is as a hindrance to peaceful negotiation. The threat is actually more useful as a "we'll pull the plug if you abandon your defence commitments" rather than "we'll pull the plug when attacked". That bludgeon prevents Western powers from seeking a managed, Hong Kong/Macao sryle reunification strategy.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 18 points 13 hours ago
[-] felixwhynot@lemmy.world 25 points 12 hours ago

Thanks for sharing this link, and I wonder if you could be nicer in your replies in the future

[-] EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

This is extremely funny and cartoonish. No one would benefit from this. As I said, the whole world would suffer.

Also, TSMC exists to make money. The Chinese government has overseen the largest economic growth of this century and would change little about the company’s daily operations.

The people who want this outcome of TSMC being destroyed are not Chinese or Taiwanese, they’re American. Like I said, it would be the Americans ordering the destruction of TSMC during reunification, as it was likely their idea to create these self-destruct mechanisms in the first place. Some ally we Americans would be if on our way out we crippled Taiwanese industry and sabotaged the world economy.

[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 1 points 32 minutes ago

You do realize, don't you, that the majority of Taiwanese do not want reunification? Well, I mean, they want reunification with their party in power and don't want CCP-controlled reunification.

In one poll, 63% said they would personally fight if China tried to force reunification. In another poll, the VAST majority wanted to maintain the status quo. Some of those want to keep the status quo and decide later, some want to keep it forever, some want to keep it but start moving toward independence. In that poll, only around 2% want reunification now, and only 5% want full independence now. In another poll, 49% wanted full independence and 27% wanted status quo, while only 12% wanted reunification.

[-] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 12 points 7 hours ago

What the taiwanese want is sovereignty.

The threat of blowing up TSMC if invaded helps with their sovereignty because it both avoids the Chinese attacking them and helps the Americans defend them.

[-] einlander@lemmy.world 20 points 14 hours ago

China has their in-house Longson chip and can use Risc-v. This has the potential of accelerating a switch from x86/arm to more open standards.

[-] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 23 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

China's biggest hurdle is not the ability to make a chip, but more the ability to get good yields. It's more or less running into the same problem Intel did with 10nm, and what samsung has and the main reason why basically every chip maker is behind tsmc on bleeding edge.

This has the potential of accelerating a switch from x86/arm to more open standards.

hardware is a two way street, the other is getting a proper OS environment and people to be behind said projects. It's not like RISC-V designs aren't currently available.For example, Pine64's risc-v options have been available in the market for quite some time now. And DeepComputing is trying to release its framework laptop equivalent board using a StarFive JH7110. It will only accelerate if there is a bodies available to create the ecosystem in it, and as of the moment, not many developers are putting effort into making it an ecosystem.

An example of why hardware/software need to coexist is Snapdragon X Elite on Linux, as well as Asahi Linux(Arm based Macs on Linux). Neither are complete projects and do not hit the same performance their native OS versions hit yet remotely(nor efficiency). Theres a LOT you have to do to optimize hardware to the OS, and that just doesn't happen instantly.

this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2024
101 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

60059 readers
2916 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world