646
Would you agree? (programming.dev)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MrMamiya@feddit.de 74 points 1 year ago

If Linux was dominant it wouldn’t be Linux. There would be more pressure to monetize and there would always be someone willing to sell out for that money. You can see this even in the Linux community today. I’m sorry I had to be so negative about it though, it sounds nice.

[-] Frog-Brawler@kbin.social 66 points 1 year ago

Maybe it should say, “If the world went open source, and capitalism went away.”

[-] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 year ago

Even fantasy should have some limits folks c'mon now

[-] jamieWxyzt@kulupu.duckdns.org 8 points 1 year ago

Which is more fantastical? Unlimited profits and line going up forever in a finite world? Or capitalism actually ending so all lives can live free from subjugation?

[-] vettnerk@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 year ago

If windows didn't exist, linux would dominate with the problems you describe, and we'd still see this meme, but advocating for FreeBSD instead.

That being said, I like them both. It's been a while since I last used bsd, so I think it's about time I give it another spin.

[-] itsJoelle@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I'm unsure. I switch between MacOS and Linux regularly.

I'd reckon Apple's OS would dominate the "user friendly" space(not saying Linux is bad, just what everyone memes).

[-] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Linux is already dominant on just about everything except the desktop, and it has yet to suffer significant enshittification.

Edit: Well, a bunch of Linux distributions have suffered enshittification, if that counts.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] tool@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

If Linux was dominant it wouldn’t be Linux. There would be more pressure to monetize and there would always be someone willing to sell out for that money. You can see this even in the Linux community today. I’m sorry I had to be so negative about it though, it sounds nice.

This is a very Desktop/workstation-centric view of the situation and you're completely neglecting 3/4ths of the story. Linux is already hilariously dominant on the on-prem server and Cloud side of things. Like, it's not even close. Pretty much any website you visit, the odds are overwhelming that it's running Linux. Even Microsoft runs most of the underlying infrastructure for Azure and Github on Linux. Android is the #1 mobile phone platform in the world, which runs on, you guessed it, Linux.

And it's already monetized to the gills. Red Hat has multi-billion earnings per quarter, every quarter, and Canonical is almost certainly going to IPO this year.

It's already dominant in pretty much every space it touches and it has been for a very long time. Desktop/workstation is pretty much the singular exception to that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] IcedCoffeeBitch@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

At least it would be GPL tho.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] teamonkey@lemm.ee 56 points 1 year ago

I don’t see anyone outside so it checks out.

[-] MrSlicer@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

They are all learning how to use the terminal.

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

They are inside trying to compile the software thst opens the automatic doors.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 year ago

They will die there, because they need a slightly older version of some minor library for compatibility, and nobody cared enough to continue hosting it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Boogeyman4325@reddthat.com 48 points 1 year ago

Not really. Having heterogeneity among operating systems is better than pure homogeneity. Say, if everyone ran Linux, and some massive security flaw was discovered, we would all be screwed at the same time. However, if we ran different stuff, and some massive security hole was found for just one operating system, then only a small portion of the world is vulnerable at once. Besides, more operating systems can lead to more innovation, as long as there is good competition between them.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If the whole world focused and used just 1 OS for every system for a long enough time line, I think it would evolve fast enough to reach a point of perfection, where there are no security holes or flaws of any kind. I do believe that while programming has many ways of doing the same task, there is always an objectively best way to do it. Eventually the best way to do everything an OS needs to do would be found; it would be faster if there was only 1 OS to work with to reach that point.

[-] Nintendo@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

where there are no security holes or flaws of any kind

this in itself is straight up impossible to know or prove. when can you say your program has no vulnerabilities? ever hear of zerodays? finding the best way to do everything in software will never be found or stay constant either.

[-] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 19 points 1 year ago

I do believe that while programming has many ways of doing the same task, there is always an objectively best way to do it.

I've been writing code in one form or another for some 30 years now, and my observation so far has been the exact opposite: there are many problems in programming for which there is no one clearly superior solution, even in theory. Just like life in general, programming is full of trade-offs, compromises, and diminishing returns.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 44 points 1 year ago

The problem is capitalism, not which kernel everything runs. And the reason FOSS isn't universal is also capitalism.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social 37 points 1 year ago

Aren’t the majority of computers already on Linux? Unless you mean desktops

[-] GammaScorpii@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Most computers in the world are not desktops

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Rakust@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

No, because everyone would be sitting around jacking each other off about using linux, if current trends are to be believed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TomMonkeyMan@chinese.lol 16 points 1 year ago

they miss the statue of Linus Torvalds

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] stilgar@infosec.pub 15 points 1 year ago

No, you missed the homeless encampments, forest fires and car centric cities.

There's no apt install utopia.

[-] vrkr@programming.dev 14 points 1 year ago

No place for bazaar. Looks more like corporations wet dream.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 year ago

Linux kernel

Nah bro, chrome OS is fucking ridiculous not to mention android too.

We need the other linux not just kernel.

[-] Poopmeister@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

Would expect the architecture to be a bit more on the brutalist side of things

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] halvar@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

Until the moment someone finds a privilage escalation bug.

[-] Yuki@kutsuya.dev 5 points 1 year ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Sigmatics@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago

So you mean we would have weird useless concrete structures everywhere? I doubt it

[-] Gargari@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

It does run on Linux 😁😁😁

[-] marcos@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Is that image supposed to represent an utopia?

[-] Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago

Its urban hell, but a few more trees

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Mardoniush@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

Nah, industrial and infrastructure should mostly use BSD. And "Never see a command line" consumer OS's should generally be forks from Linux or other FOSS. Most Linux distros have come a long way and are ready for gaming prime time, but fail the "80 year old grandma who wants to digitise her record collection but is a bit unclear on double-clicking" test.

[-] jack@monero.town 7 points 1 year ago

Linux itself does nothing for desktop computing, you also need GNU and the rest of the free software suit to better the world

[-] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 6 points 1 year ago

If everyone used Linux I would use BSD

[-] jhulten@infosec.pub 5 points 1 year ago

All monocultures suck.

[-] milkjug@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Probably done in jest, but this reads like the 100,000,000th “agree?” bullshit post on LinkedIn.

[-] mustardman@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

> every building by zaha hadid

> still not a walkable City

I would not agree

[-] RobertOwnageJunior@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

No, because that would make me stupid.

[-] s12@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago

“But if we put all the world’s shares into Linux, the other Kernel Patron Units would be incapacitated!”

… I doubt anyone will get this reference.

[-] mtchristo@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

No esthetics wise it would be worse than the USSR

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
646 points (100.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

19187 readers
1029 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS