330
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

Close to half of American adults favor TikTok ban, Reuters/Ipsos poll shows::Close to half of American adults support a ban on the Chinese-owned social media app TikTok, according to a new Reuters/Ipsos survey that also asked questions about national security concerns and China.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlickOfTheBean@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago

Hmm can someone tell me if I'm just in a "republicans are hysteric about it so it must not be that bad" mindset?

It's obviously spyware to some degree, but this really seems more like a case of red-scare. I can't put my finger on exactly why, though. Makes me think I might just be reacting to their reaction.

I guess, what exactly are they afraid that China is going to do with this data? It's a missing puzzle piece that I've heard nothing coherent on besides "China gonna spy on muh datas". Like, sure, maybe if you're a government official, and I don't think bans of tiktok on government devices are stupid, but I think the nationwide ban idea is pretty dumb and baseless. So I guess my actual question is, what are they afraid of happening, exactly?

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I look at it as completely missing the root problem, which is companies have way too much power to harvest and hoard data. If there were strong data ownership and protection laws in the US TikTok would either follow those rules or be fined/banned for actual cause. Washington is just mad a company not in US jurisdiction is the one doing the harvesting for once.

[-] FlickOfTheBean@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I don't disagree with that which is why I'm currently in the "this is red-scare" camp. If Washington (more specifically, the NSA and friends) hadn't been buying our data to peruse via the lax privacy laws we currently have, maybe they'd have a leg to stand on with any of this...

[-] sjm@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

I agree, and I always want to know what TikTok is taking that facebook, twitter, etc aren't also taking

[-] CanofBeanz@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

The exact same shit, it's just what continent it's stored on.

[-] Kinglink@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Ask yourself if the American government had the ability to talk directly to the Russian populace with no interference from their government, what might they say/do/cause to happen.

That's what Tiktok is, and that's what a lot of the fear is about. It's know that all Chinese companies have heavy connections to the government, so if they wanted to do something they could.

Not even saying Tiktok is that bad, mostly just saying Americans, especially the government is a bunch of fucking hypocrites about this shit.

Honestly, keep it to "If you don't like it don't use it" and leave it at that. The idea of the government picking what social network people are allowed on seems foolish, and I imagine many people will side load the app (At least on Android) if it's officially banned.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ERPAdvocate@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

I might be a little paranoid here so feel free to lmk, but a few uses for the data gathered by a foreign government/keeping people addicted:

The most obvious: Propaganda to push people to distrust their government

The less reasonable but still possible: Time wasting, people spend less time trying new things due to the lack of instant gratification, decreasing productivity/capability of the users. We've seen China begin to address this domestically with new laws limiting usage, what the US would consider overreach (unless it effects the bottom line perhaps?)

The downright unreasonable: Profile building using accounts as a digital fingerprint to determine military capability, it's amazing what people will advertise about themselves online, TikTok occasionally tells people what illness (mental or physical) before even they are formally diagnosed. Imagine leveraging that information in a 'unethical' way, the possibilities are endless.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] treadful@lemmy.zip 39 points 1 year ago

I can't believe so many people are cool with the federal government censuring specific platforms. It's one thing if we wanted to ban an action through law (e.g. data harvesting or shipping it overseas) but it's another to silence a specific piece of software.

Imagine if Congress passed a bill saying Steve can't recommend movies to his friends anymore.

[-] Yendor@reddthat.com 25 points 1 year ago

Being worried about CCP controlled apps is a sensible concern. Banning a single app (because Mark Zuckerberg is upset that it’s stealing his customers) is not a helpful solution.

[-] treadful@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 year ago

I'm not saying that's not concerning (it's why I won't use it). I think what they can do with widespread analytics and pseudonymous data collection is... potentially impactful in ways we can't foresee.

But the Bill of Rights does not only apply to US citizens. And targeted bans are just a tool of government censorship that I'd rather not see wielded by politicians. I think the only reason it's targeted is because they either don't have evidence of the negative behavior or they're unwilling to ban the it because it would impact domestic platforms.

load more comments (4 replies)

If Steve is a genocidal authoritarian asshole who, in the process of recommending movies, plants listening devices around your home, GPS trackers in your clothing and keyloggers on your computer while browsing through your underwear drawer and file cabinets, I don't think he's very good company. Steve might start by showing you Airplane! and Blazing Saddles but once you're drawn in by the entertainment, he'll sit you down for the Wolf Warrior movies, Amazing China and The Battle at Lake Changjin.

Ban Steve, he can keep pushing his agenda on his own family back home. That's still not an ideal situation but this at least is reasonably within our rights and capabilities.

[-] ultrasquid@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

But in that case, it would be a far better option to ban anyone from placing keyloggers on your computer and GPS trackers in your clothing, because that not only stops Steve from doing it, but also Steve's cousin Alex, and anyone else who would want to do so.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] zephr_c@lemm.ee 36 points 1 year ago

Cool, can we ban all the American apps that do all the same spying too? Because otherwise this is just whining that China is stealing our shtick.

[-] Overzeetop@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 year ago

We need to ban talk radio and Fox News and OAN, too.

[-] Guy_Fieris_Hair@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If the bill was purely a tictok ban that would be questionable enough. But the bill is SO MUCH MORE THAN THAT. Also, every app in America does the same shit. Just because they are capitalist America and not communist China doesn't make it better. Unless of course, you are a politician that benefits monetarily if the American company prevails.

[-] shashi154263@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Believe me, banning TikTok is not the solution.

TikTok is banned here since long time, but people are doing same shit, just on Instagram Reels and YouTube Shorts.

[-] Kinglink@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

And almost half of Americans favor banning the free speech of the opposing view points (Which ever party they aren't). So this is not a shock.

[-] Knusper@feddit.de 19 points 1 year ago

In other news, close to 100% of American adults are over the age of the target user group for TikTok.

Obviously, favoring a ban is a more political stance than just not using it yourself, but it's still easy to call for bans, if you wouldn't be affected.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

I'm 43 and regularly use TikTok. I've learned about soap making, trans rights, d&d, and a million other things. It's a great platform.

If you're on TikTok and just seeing teenage girls dancing, it's because you want to see that. Their algorithm is no joke.

[-] Stinkywinks@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

20% owned by China, 60% owned by global investors and 20% by private. Headquarters in Singapore and LA. I think tiktok is dumb as shit and never use it but there's a Chinese company called tencent that owns 97% of riot games. So let's ban league of legends cause dota 2 is better anyways.

Ban them both, make HoTS great again.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] kite@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

I don't know what in the world my officemate would do with herself if she couldn't watch TikTok all day. Besides her actual fucking work for a change, that is.

I am so goddamn sick of hearing the same "hehe hehe" and the same fake-sounding scream-laugh that those videos all use for backgrounds/overlays that I am ready to shove an ice pick in my ears. Ban this garbage, please!

[-] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Though I agree that it should be banned. It will probably live on as youtube shorts or instagram reels or whatever the fuck it's called.

[-] OneCardboardBox@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 1 year ago

How about we pass a goddamn federal-level privacy law in this country?

Oh... I see...

You say it's too hard to reconcile privacy laws between 50 states? Hmm, yes. Sounds impossible for a global superpower. Let's just get back to banning things. Cool!

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Franzia 14 points 1 year ago

Because the situation is so much deeper than just "banning TikTok" but rather

  • US government monopoly on data hoovering
  • Using tiktok as bait while rolling back even more privacy and safety protections
  • Inconsistent dogma against chinese businesses
[-] ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 year ago

Close to half isn't a majority.

[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I’ll bet close to half of the people in favor of a ban don’t even really know what it is.

[-] RoyalEngineering@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Here we go again.

These articles are like catnip.

People get worked up about something that isn’t going to happen.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] mysoulishome@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I have a few feelings about it. First, I’m an average middle-aged middle-class straight white cisgendered male and the TikTok algorithm feeds me tons of stuff that is very pro feminism, pro trans rights, anti racist, pro labor. In a very touching and uplifting way a lot of times, actually. I’m a boring person but VERY passionate about these socially liberal issues and it gives me what I want and need to feel like a force of good, keep up with social issues, stay involved in some way feel passionate. My TikTok feed is woke as shit and good for me. I simply don’t see this on Facebook, YouTube and all the rest. I don’t see it. Of course everyone’s algorithm is different…

So maybe TikTok uses my attention for evil…data harvesting, influencing, hacking…I don’t know. I don’t trust china any more or less than most people. But how much do we trust meta, Google, Apple, Microsoft etc? I don’t particularly.

I may just be naive…but I do see a lot of good things that TikTok does, as dumb as it sounds.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Starb3an@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

My largest issue with this whole article is the source of data. It is completely based on a survey taken on their own site. This means that they're just feeding the readers their own preferences back to them.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


WASHINGTON, Aug 16 (Reuters) - Close to half of American adults support a ban on the Chinese-owned social media app TikTok, according to a new Reuters/Ipsos survey that also asked questions about national security concerns and China.

The survey also revealed deep worries among Americans about China's global influence at a time when U.S.-China relations have fallen to their lowest point in decades.

FBI Director Christopher Wray said in March that China's government could use TikTok to control software on millions of devices and drive narratives to divide Americans, adding that the app "screams" of national security concerns.

Other top U.S. intelligence officials, including CIA Director William Burns, also have said TikTok poses a threat.

Former President Donald Trump in 2020 sought to bar new downloads of TikTok but a series of court decisions blocked the ban from taking effect.

Florida governor and presidential candidate Ron DeSantis has said he favors some form of national ban on the app.


I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It's already banned in all Federal facilities due to the fact that it's an application with access to phone's sensor hardware and it sends data to China, and the company's corporate operations are overseen (and potentially directed) by the CCP

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
330 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59017 readers
3321 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS