375

Google said that such negative reviews, unrelated to the actual business, “violates” its policies, and hence have been removed.

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)
[-] Melt@lemm.ee 217 points 1 week ago

Users left reviews for at least three McDonald's locations in or around Altoona, Pennsylvania, with dozens of people leaving one star ratings and complaining about "rats." Others more explicitly called out "snitches."

"This location has rats in the kitchen that will make you sick and your insurance isn't going to cover it," one reviewer wrote.

Based reviewers

[-] MrVilliam@lemm.ee 117 points 1 week ago

I for one believe that the question of whether a food service establishment has rats is very relevant to the business.

The character of the staff and clientele as well as the financial state of the staff as a direct result of how stingy their employer is can also be very relevant. Do you want to eat somewhere if the people preparing your food there will sell their morals and decency? Kinda seems likely that I could pay somebody there $100 to put their pubes into your quarter pounder.

[-] morriscox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Maybe the person only heard of the murder, saw some pictures, and didn't know about all the "justice warriors" foaming at the mouth. I know plenty of people who hardly use the Internet and certainly don't go on any social media platforms, even Facebook. We can't expect every single person to know all the details.

[-] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 85 points 1 week ago

All this convenience in tech. We never stopped to ask ourselves what we were giving up. Add protest to the list of sacrifices to the altar of affluence.

[-] einkorn@feddit.org 17 points 1 week ago

Don't get me wrong, I also hate Monopolies, but a company exercising their rights on their own platform? Fine by me. Just don't use their platform.

[-] Womble@lemmy.world 63 points 1 week ago

That's a reasonable stance to take when said company is just one competing in a marketplace. But when they are a monopoly operating a quasi-utility that should be public its not good enough.

[-] tabular@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

It's interacting in our country, meaning we can do more than only "don't use it". When the platform is so massive, has little competition, or most other platforms do the same thing in question.. maybe we should do more.

[-] dtrain@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

If the only form of protest we have is virtual and based on stars and upvotes, then we are doing it very, very wrong

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 83 points 1 week ago

Fuck McDonalds, fuck Google. Got it.

Hey, I was already there!

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago

Yeah, they let Trump behind the counter. Fuck McDonalds.

[-] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 53 points 1 week ago

They do this for every business that gets review bombed. I don't know what's the big surprise there.

In fact, if you use Google maps, you yourself agreed to Not do this kind of behavior in the TOS.

This has been causal in the past for directly suspending Gmail accounts

[-] db2@lemmy.world 44 points 1 week ago

This is expected for non-legitimate reviews.

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 37 points 1 week ago

Haven't they been doing this for review bombing for a number of years now?

[-] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 week ago

But not this particular McDick's, so this is big news. Huge even. /s

[-] index@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 week ago

Time to review bomb google

[-] john89@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 week ago

Personally, I think the class traitor is the one who deserves this ire.

[-] Drusas@fedia.io 10 points 1 week ago

I was shocked that he showed his face to the media (BBC article from earlier today). Bold.

To be fair, they also did this for the Kamala spice shop thing, and also the trump mcdonalds thing.

[-] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 20 points 1 week ago

And a lot of other situations with review bombing over the past decade.

[-] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago

I mean, they're correct.

But fuck McDonald's.

[-] mEEGal@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

they did this when TikTok was review-bombed on Play Store a few years back. tas long as they make the rules, we can't beat them at their own game

[-] Professorozone@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

I'm guessing they are very specific as to which terms have been violated in their decision to remove.

[-] morriscox@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Why blame a business for the actions of one person?

[-] Cyberjin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Because they are glorified the guy who did the crime and blaming that McDonald's for snitching and getting him caught.

America is wild, next time you see a wanted person, don't call the police..

[-] Cyberjin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Probably the same people that fantasizing about the* murder.

this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
375 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59974 readers
1937 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS