229
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world 194 points 7 months ago

Who gives a shit? Republicans made a felon president. Nothing fucking matters anymore.

[-] Dagrothus@reddthat.com 51 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

A felon that had to be given immunity by the supreme court he picked himself in order to stay out of prison long enough for the richest man in the world to get him elected.

You can't make this shit up

[-] Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world 35 points 7 months ago

Reminds me of this

[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 21 points 7 months ago

And that's why you should let me go, Your Honor

[-] rimu@piefed.social 12 points 7 months ago

Exactly. Trump is about to pardon dozens/hundreds of treasonous terrorists (Jan 6th).

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

If I wanted to operate on republican standards of integrity I'd be a republican.

[-] Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

You’re operating on Republican standards of integrity whether you want to or not, because nothing fucking matters anymore. That’s just the hand you’ve been dealt.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 86 points 7 months ago

Honestly? With the absolute thought crime aspect and the way the plea deal was handled, I don't blame him one bit. There's no public interest in locking up Hunter Biden.

[-] Cptn_Slow@lemmy.world 57 points 7 months ago

There's no public interest in locking a lot of people up, yet they still do.

Rules should be applied equally, regardless of who you or your parents are.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 21 points 7 months ago

This rule should be disregarded equally.

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

Ya but he's white and wealthy. That shits better than Teflon these days.

[-] BMTea@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago

Yeah, I don't see any public interest involved at all when it comes to the issue of presidents using their power to get their relatives off jail time. I don't think it undermines the sense of justice and equality that all citizens are supposed to have if the "first among equal citizens" can get their crackhead middle ages son off of already lenient legal consequences for actions that others are serving hard time for. Not at all a conspicuous legal hole that undermines the concept of the rule of law, and definitely not open to abuse.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

That was part of the problem. The judge bowed to political pressure and rejected a completely normal plea deal to throw the book at the guy instead.

If you ask me the pardon power isn't used nearly enough.

[-] BMTea@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

Judges do that all the time. Hunter Biden was the 50+ year old son of one of the most powerful people in the country. Not some 22 year old street kid from a poor district.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

There’s no public interest in locking up Hunter Biden.

Nonsense. Theres a massive public interest in a privileged member of the political elite being held to the same legal standards and to the same due process as you and me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 57 points 7 months ago

So this is his big Grand exit? He could do so much on the way out the door for the country but instead the senile old fuck only cares about his damn kid.

[-] Drusas@fedia.io 13 points 7 months ago

This is one trivial act.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Xanthrax@lemmy.world 46 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Donald Trump has a hitlist. Hunter is on that list. I don't think he deserves the pardon, but he needs it. Republicans will crucify him given the chance. I don't really want to see Republicans holding his head up on a pike for all to see, as much as they'd love that.

[-] Xero@infosec.pub 7 points 7 months ago

I am pretty sure that Trump would have had that man killed in prison. In my books his dad did the right thing, fuck the optics.

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 26 points 7 months ago

Which, no fuck you Biden for pardoning your son. He committed multiple crimes, including gun laws and convicted in a fair trial.

Fuck you for proving that there is a two tier Justice system.

Fuck you for undermining gun control.

Fuck you for giving yet another example that Democrats are no better than Republicans.

[-] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 23 points 7 months ago

For real. I don't think Joe's wrong to say Hunter was singled out, but Hunter still did those things.

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Yeah, I also agree but as you can see, people still treat this crap as a team sport instead of treating everyone equally under the law.

I mean hell, how are we supposed to say fuck the trump family for all their shady, illegal behavior with taxes and prosecute them when Democrats are pardoning a tax evader and making excuses when he did do those things regardless of political bullshit.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/legal-experts-say-charges-hunter-biden-are-rarely-brought-rcna90191

 "It insults the intelligence of the American people to compare misdemeanor tax charges to a scheme to steal Top Secret documents and obstruct justice when the government asked for them back," he tweeted, comparing the charges against Hunter Biden to the recent federal indictment against former President Donald Trump. "If anything, Hunter Biden was treated harshly — those crimes are rarely charged."

[-] Tinidril@midwest.social 7 points 7 months ago

and convicted in a fair trial.

To be fair, that's kinda just what pardons are for.

I almost want to give Hunter a break because he never would have even been charged if his dad wasn't President. Then I remember how he misused his father's status for personal gain. I figure that takes the first issue off the table.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 26 points 7 months ago

Just in case any future presidents need a precedent for this kinda stuff.

[-] Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world 25 points 7 months ago

If you think trump regarded precedent at all, i have a bridge to sell you.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Squorlple@lemmy.world 26 points 7 months ago

Democrats aren’t exactly being a role model right now, but a lot of them are probably covering the asses of their own since Republicans are so blind by fascistic rage that they’re going to put a lot of innocent heads on pikes.

[-] BMTea@lemmy.world 28 points 7 months ago

This thread reads like a satire of how Democrats are happy to sink lower and lower while using the GOP as an excuse.

[-] Squorlple@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

Yeah. I’m willing to say when I see my far-preferred party doing something I consider unethical, but I also recognize their game theory and why the current circumstances would lead them to make myopic decisions in the interest of short-term survival and at the cost of long-term reputation and public perception.

[-] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 25 points 7 months ago

As liberals brush it off as if there isn't a 2 tiered justice system in the US.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Cptn_Slow@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago

Rules for thee...

Wait, where are the "hur dur both sides is bullshit" people?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cogitase@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 7 months ago

All the other cases where they sentenced someone with a federal gun charge for lying on the form were plea deals. ABC said they couldn't find any instances of someone being charged and convicted on that charge alone. You can't say this wasn't a politically motivated prosecution when the charge has never been used that way before.

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Its not the first time dems look indistinguishable from republicans (who are fascists) on Joe's watch, is it.

Biden is a guy who participated in obvious war crimes that 88% of his party didnt support-- as a democrat.. And imperiously ignored the key issues of the campaign. Of course he's going to pardon his shitty d-bag lobbyist son on the way out the door. Biden has lowered the bar for his party, for democracy, and for the entire western world order straight through the floor and deep into bedrock. We'll need some sort of engineering miracle to ever even raise the bar up to ground level, much less hold it any higher anytime soon.

[-] zenitsu@sh.itjust.works 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Most of the country clearly stated that they don't give a fuck about the law. Why should Biden insist on crucifying his son on some cringe gun ownership violation, while the government gets stacked with criminals? and you're going to equate this to republicans? with Trump pardoning all his scumbag cronies who committed crimes on his behalf? The criminal elect who tried to steal the 2020 election? Get the fuck out of here

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Kintarian@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

Liberals are partly to blame. Many workers in the South and Midwest lost their jobs, and liberals responded by looking down their noses at the "dumb country bumpkins" in the flyover states, where the so-called "basket of deplorables" live. They should listen to the educated elites. Democrats focus on social justice instead of jobs and the price of bread, leaving them out of touch with the common person.**

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

But Biden said he was the justice guy and he would not intervene!

All the excuses to pardon Hunter out of "fear of Trump" could be used to excuse things that actually helped the public

[-] ATDA@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

On on hand fuck Biden for betraying what little respect I had.

But also rump's bullshit all vanished.

Fuck it.

[-] HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com 7 points 7 months ago

Well that's a robust fuck you to republicans.

[-] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 months ago

Yikes. This is not going to go over well.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
229 points (100.0% liked)

politics

24707 readers
2472 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS