How do you make book banning even worse? Ask ChatGPT which books to ban (www.popsci.com)

submitted 2 years ago by blakestacey@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] swlabr@awful.systems 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Broke: republican book banning

Woke: don’t ban books

Roke(o): On one hand I am a fan of regressive content bans, but allowing ChatGPT to decide which books get banned is how we get the basilisk!!!

[-] 200fifty@awful.systems 7 points 2 years ago

Exman tells PopSci that, even with ChatGPT’s deficiencies, administrators believe the tool remains the simplest way to legally comply with new legislation.

I mean it's certainly simpler to do things incorrectly. Can't argue with this logic

[-] zogwarg@awful.systems 6 points 2 years ago

It ain't honest but it's easy work!

[-] feistel@sns.feistel.party 1 points 2 years ago

@blakestacey "Each of [the titles of] these texts was reviewed using AI software"

this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023

24 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1750 readers

64 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

dgerard@awful.systems