400
TURKEY POWER (mander.xyz)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 62 points 2 months ago

if they claim a 15lb Turkey feeds 12, how am I supposed trust any of the other numbers?

[-] hissingmeerkat@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 months ago

Or how 1 GW/(200 W/person) came up with a number that started with a 3 instead of a 5. Like 5 million people, not 30 million.

[-] Ropianos@feddit.org 3 points 2 months ago

But it only takes 3.5 hours per turkey and a day has 24 of them. So if some people get up at 3am it works out!

[-] ToothpasteSundae@lemmy.dbzer0.com 61 points 2 months ago

Can we also talk about the way they chose to manipulate the perception of the data by their choice of states

[-] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

There are states with populations higher than 30 million. Like yea that's a lot of people, but the cherry picking of states is annoying

[-] AnAustralianPhotographer@lemmy.world 42 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Rookie Numbers. It only uses electrical power generated. Why not cook turkeys in heat destined for cooling towers ? Gotta push those numbers way up.

[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 months ago

Or just toss all the turkeys into the reactor

[-] eldain@feddit.nl 10 points 2 months ago

Restricted sous-vide basin

[-] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 2 months ago

Turkey control rods

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 34 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The fun part of this is this is true of any 1GW power source. We have been deploying solar+battery arrays in that range recently for much less money and much faster than nuclear.

Thanks "Office of nuclear energy" for pointing out how useful large scale solar+battery is too!

[-] passiveaggressivesonar@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago

I really don't get this ackshually business about nuclear power, we're absolute idiots to not employ it more. Everywhere there's been a focus on nuclear power generation we're seeing reliable results over a long long timespan

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] wasabi@feddit.org 22 points 2 months ago

How is this a meme?

[-] toothbrush 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

2.5 Million Turkeys... and 500-1500 cubic meters of impossible to store basically forever radioactive nuclear (LILW) waste😋😋😋

source

[-] Morphit@feddit.uk 15 points 2 months ago

1500 cubic meters

Did you really pick the figure from the RBMK reactor type?

For PWRs, 250 m³ of LILW per GW annum is 28.5 m³ of LILW per TWh.

2.5 million turkeys in a 2.4 kW oven for 3.5 hours uses 0.021 TWh.

So 2.5 million turkeys and 0.6 m³ total low and intermediate wastes generated. Most of this can be released after ~300 years with negligible activity over natural background. That is a long time but not "basically forever".

[-] chaogomu@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

I'm not sure where they got those numbers.

All nuclear waste produced to date isn't 500-1500 cubic meters.

As to storage. Just bury it again. We dug it up, we can bury it. There are a few places that are currently doing just that.

Or, here a wild idea. Just burn the waste. It's something like 90% unburned fuel, just reprocess it and burn it.

[-] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 months ago

Just burn the waste

Wouldn't that like... eradiate our whole fucking atmosphere? O.o

[-] Morphit@feddit.uk 10 points 2 months ago

They're talking about recycling the fuel and putting it back into the reactors. Unfortunately it's cheaper to mine fresh fuel than to reprocess used fuel ... as long as you just ignore the waste problem.

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Well, any waste problem is a hell of a lot better than what we're doing to the atmosphere.

Coal should be illegal now.

[-] toothbrush 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The source for that number is the International Atomic Energy Agency aka the nuclear control agency. As for the rest of your ideas, its sadly not that easy. It has to be stored somewhere where it cant contaminate the environment, water cant get to it, tectonics are stable, etc. No permanent storage location for the waste has been found, to date.

And to burn the unburned fuel you would have to breed the material, which is a process that requires the most dangerous reactors and is extremely costly.

[-] Morphit@feddit.uk 9 points 2 months ago

No permanent storage location for the waste has been found, to date.

Onkalo

to burn the unburned fuel you would have to breed the material

France reprocesses spent fuel. With increased scale it would be cheaper and cut down on the volume of waste that must be dealt with regardless of if there's a nuclear industry in the future.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] jlow@beehaw.org 3 points 2 months ago

Yeah, what about the waste, gonna eat that with your Turkey?

[-] ChillPenguin@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

Wow, didn't realize how anti-nuclear Lemmy is after looking at this comment thread.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Jean_le_Flambeur@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Now calculate how many generations of turkeys will be eaten till the waste stops killing people

Edit: can't believe how many people here are falling for nuclear. Have you all learned nothing from what companies did with fossil fuels? Taking the profits and leaving humanity with a fucked up world? And now you are falling for the same stuff with nuclear again, I assume this is the discourse in america which is so scewed? Here in Europe people are not that naive... Even the ones in France, which is quite into nuclear are reasonable and see the waste problem normally.

And here on Lemmy people really come and say "nuclear waste isn't dangerous, it didn't kill anyone"

Wtf people?!

[-] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 months ago

How many people has all the waste we've produced kill up to now?

[-] Jean_le_Flambeur@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nuclear_and_radiation_accidents_by_death_toll

Quite a few (if you remember not even a fraction oft its life time is over by now)

Also: radiation doesn't kill right away. Often you live 10 more years with weird symptoms and die from something like heart attack, so your death isn't counted as "caused by radiation exposure" but as "died from cancer" or "heart attack"

[-] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 months ago

Yes, radiation can kill people decades later, but so does pollution from burning fossil fuel. BTW, your link talks about nuclear accidents, not the number of people killed by nuclear wastes produced normally, which is what you claimed is killing people. A bit of a misdirection on your part, isn't it?

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Nuclear waste is indeed a problem, however it is a contained problem that can be isolated. Oil's byproduct are distributed into the atmosphere and are killing every living thing on earth. Do you know how many people die every year due to pollution from burning fossil fuels? It's orders of magnitude worse. The fear of nuclear waste, while absolutely an issue, is so incredibly blown out of proportion compared to the silent killer that is fossil fuels.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Zerush@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 months ago
[-] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago

If people didn't all turn their oven on at the same time but took more of a staggered approach this would supply a lot more people.

[-] hissingmeerkat@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago

No, it's already wrong even for realistic staggered dinners.

I think they are using an arbitrary GW-day of energy instead of power, so it can't even come close to making as much turkey as claimed.

[-] Morphit@feddit.uk 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

They're over by a factor of 6 which would add up to 21 hours, not 24. I don't know what they've done to get 2.5 million, it should be 417 thousand with those numbers.

Edit: Oh dear. They said each oven could completely cook 6 turkeys in a day so they rounded to that number. At least it no longer reads GW/day.
The source

[-] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Time zones probably help with that!

[-] yournamehere@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago

in a country where half of the presidents cant even pronounce nukular....and the only usecase for nukular is make some machines like openAI work cheaper. go eat the nukular waste george.

[-] ShankShill@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

If you cook me a 15lb turkey in 3 1/2 hours that burnt dry shit is going in the trash.

  • Dude standing by a smoker with 10 lbs of pork ribs for the past 4 hours
[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

With Vogtle expansion costing over $15B per gw, that is $6000+ per fed person, before counting the cost of importing uranium from Russia.

[-] Flipper@feddit.org 4 points 2 months ago

Also without storing the nuclear waste.

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

or security costs, including the promised good time of civil war that get's floated around.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2024
400 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

11846 readers
1092 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS