291
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 44 points 2 months ago

The SCOTUS immunity decision will echo even more

[-] PortoPeople@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

It's the end of the Republic.

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 39 points 2 months ago

I mean it's not hard to know what happens when accountability isn't a thing anymore.

Spoiler Alert: everything turns to shit.

Why should we obey laws if our leader is a convicted felon who gets to bypass the punishment phase? Why should we ever respond to a jury summons for a sham justice system? Why should we pay taxes when our leader is a tax cheat?

Nothing matters now.

[-] PortoPeople@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Yup. Things will be different from now on.

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 31 points 2 months ago

No. It has already been forgotten.

Just look at how many idiots (including around here...) keep insisting that the US Military will stand up against trump when he decides he wants a third term or some other complete shitting on of democracy.

We already went through this. But that would involve people remembering the Heroic Men And Women In Green sitting on their hands waiting to see how the POTUS trying to lynch the VPOTUS and murder Congress would play out.

[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago
[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 months ago

Heads up: that only makes any sense if the person you are replying to said the word "if" anywhere in their post. Rather than "when".

[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

You know what yeah, I've got no idea why I imagined the "when" to be an "if"

Probably wishful thinking

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago

It sets the tone for the remainder of the Republic. Perhaps a ruling as significant in outcome as the result of the Civil War.

Treason isn't a criminal activity.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

Yeah, no kidding. Thanks to milquetoast "centrists" and the rabid right wing...

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yeah, but not in the way it seems. There will be no absence of "accountability" there will be "accountability" it just will be Republican lead investigations lying about 2020 and arresting Democrats on false charges of "stealing" that election. They've already said that is the intention. They will not stop crying about 2020 and will use it as an excuse to go full authoritarian on their opposition.

[-] EffortlessEffluvium@lemm.ee 10 points 2 months ago

I despise Trump for just about everything, and my opinion goes back to the ‘80s. This is gonna piss a lot of people off, but Bill Clinton has a lot to do with this shitshow. While Ken Starr was an absolute tool for trying to get him for anything, Clinton getting up in front of everyone and committing perjury with zero remorse and then getting reelected anyway, showed that America (or at least the voters) has degenerated way too far from moral integrity (history of slavery notwithstanding).

Politicians lie. That’s a given. No way you reward them for their behavior.

[-] ysjet@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Well done, you managed to find a way to blame a Democrat for this. Very helpful.

[-] EffortlessEffluvium@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Actually, I blamed American voters for selling out over a lack of integrity.

[-] thisorthatorwhatever@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

This is a failure of the government to stop Trump's dad in the 1960s when he started skimming public money when building public housing. This is a failure of the government to stop Trump in the 1970s when he rented to whites only.

[-] thisphuckinguy@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Why are all the scumbags getting away with it?

Because they own the country

[-] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

The worst part is the Dems are going to be portrayed (rightfully? Idk) as complicit

[-] BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

I would say rightfully, yes.

[-] Lemmywings@lemmy.cafe 4 points 2 months ago

I blame the democrats for it because Schiff and his band of attention hogs sought the spotlight and had to have their Jan 6th committee hearings cirklejerk. If they had appointed Jack Smith instantly then it would've gone to trial long before voters went to the polls. But instead they waited until November to appoint Smith and shot themselves in the foot in the process.

[-] GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk 1 points 2 months ago

And did you know if you were caught and you were Smoking crack,
McDonald's wouldn't even want to take you back
You could always just run for mayor of D.C.​

this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
291 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19858 readers
3399 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS