132
submitted 17 hours ago by GiddyGap@lemm.ee to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 18 points 10 hours ago

So in an effort to "cut government spending", "reduce waste", and "make the government more efficient, the first thing they did was to create three new positions out of thin air with absolutely no clear goals, and grossly overpay 3 people and counting to fill those positions.......

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

Nevermind the GAO is already a thing. But three trolls think they know how government should work...

[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 130 points 17 hours ago

I'm getting the feeling that DOGE is just becoming a dumping ground for anyone Trump promised favors for.

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago

Fake departments don't need confirmations. Maybe he'll stick Gaetz in there too.

[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 62 points 17 hours ago

In this case I think it was also to get her to shut up about Matt Gaetz.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

If only they could just get her to shut up, full stop.

[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 11 hours ago

The Department of Government Efficiency needs more people then the United Nations.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago

Department of Transportation.

[-] answersplease77@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago

you'd think the most efficient thing for the government to do is not pay her for useless roles on the expense of people tax

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 20 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

It would be another hilarious bit of the White House Reality Show Sequel, if the Department of Government Efficiency board just kept growing and growing with people that wanted a cool title from Trump to feel important.

[-] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 23 points 16 hours ago

Is this a position she needs to resign from the House to do, because that would be awful! /s

[-] shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 16 hours ago

This is how he gets rid of musk

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

I can very easily see it as a staging ground for more back door fundraising/corruption, a lauch pad for future Congressmen/Governors/etc, and a way of trial ballooning propaganda before bringing it live

this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
132 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19118 readers
2461 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS