253
submitted 8 months ago by Joker@sh.itjust.works to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 86 points 8 months ago

For the previous 8 years, instead of fighting fascism and white nationalism, the Democrats have made their enemy the populists within their own party.

It ended expectedly.

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 37 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Bernie won fewer votes in Vermont, his home state, than Kamala. One of the rare incumbent Democratic Senators who actually underperformed Harris.

[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 8 months ago

Okay now do swing states, the only states that actually end up mattering in presidential elections. Bernie captivated audiences on Fox news during his campaign, appeared in Republican town halls and listened to people. Id bet you dollars to donuts Bernie would outperform her by miles in the swing states.

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 6 points 8 months ago

... So he would do worse in the solid blue states but better in the purple states because... red leaning voters are secretly socialists but blue leaning voters are neoliberal scum?

[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Read my comment again and dont skip the part about him being well recieved on Fox News and Republican town halls. Its right there why ignore it? Was kamala as well recieved by fox news viewers?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

No, it's because Trump-leaning voters are very blatantly populist and anti-status-quo and Bernie would deliver that more genuinely than Trump.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I go back and forth, but I do think Sanders would have had good odds in 2020. We had the same "I can't vote for the status quo" non-arguments going around and a semi-populist candidate arguing for all the things people desperately needed (a socioeconomic safety net, basically) at the height of COVID and civil unrest would have done well. That said, an old white guy who was "warm and safe and was in the same room as Obama a few times" was probably still the right play.

But yeah. In 2024 when all people care about is "not the status quo" and "why eggs expensive"? A guy arguing for MORE government programs does not fair well against "Yo, what if we got rid of all taxes and government funding? Don't ask where the money is going"

[-] grue@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

But yeah. In 2024 when all people care about is "not the status quo" and "why eggs expensive"? A guy arguing for MORE government programs does not fair well against "Yo, what if we got rid of all taxes and government funding? Don't ask where the money is going"

Bernie has better answers to that than Trump, though.

[-] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 15 points 8 months ago

I was a Bernie delegate in Minnesota when he won the state in 2020 and I skill knew he had no shot in the vast majority of less liberal states. Where are the numbers coming from for people who would have supposedly voted him in, despite not winning enough primaries?

[-] grue@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

They would have been coming from:

  1. People who sat out the primaries because they were so disgusted with both parties failing to represent their interests
  2. People who voted Trump in the primary as a "burn it all down" protest vote
  3. Liberals, who would surely "vote blue no matter who" because they aren't hypocrites, right?
[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 12 points 8 months ago

Maybe, but it's all academic if we don't have the power to get him nominated. I am reminded of a quip: "We elect people without power and we're surprised that they're powerless to change things". That is the best case scenario if the DNC had somehow nominated Bernie. We need to build power, no matter what our strategy or objective. Highly recommend reading this over doom posting: https://wagingnonviolence.org/2024/11/10-things-to-do-if-trump-wins/

[-] AnarchoSnowPlow@midwest.social 7 points 8 months ago

This is absolutely untrue.

Dems should have just used more charts that show how actually you're not paying more for groceries and making less money adjusted for inflation.

They also should have just had Kamala drop out and replaced her with Liz Cheney, that would have gotten the moderate vote.

They also should have shamed the people who don't like funding wholesale slaughter around the world more, these are jobs we're talking about here!

[-] echo@lemmings.world 7 points 8 months ago

Yet, he literally, didn't win....

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 5 points 8 months ago

I am skeptical if the guy who was a meme about how nobody cares about politics on c-span AND who has historically refused to condemn the horrific "communist" regimes would do well against an opponent who does nothing but throw schoolyard insults. Calling Biden "a communist" makes most of the moderates laugh. Calling Bernie "a communist" leads to him basically saying what only the far (American) left wants to hear and terrifying the hell out of the center.

But also? This makes no fucking sense and just makes "leftists" look like assholes.

  • Because Hilary was not as left leaning as Sanders you... refused to vote and gave the right wing moron the win?
  • Because Biden was not as left leaning as Sanders... he won? Or are we now saying that Genocide Joe is a straight up marxist?
  • Because Kamala was not as left leaning as Sanders you... refused to vote and gave the openly fascist hatemonger the win?

I do think the Dems screwed up the "primary". But also? There was no time. Conventional wisdom is that you don't run against your own incumbent and the extent of Biden's infirmity was not apparent until way too late. We were never going to have nation wide votes and it was always going to be "super delegates". But maybe a more public "debate" rather than all the major players just saying "Yeah, Kamala is awesome" within a few hours of her announcing would have done more for the "base" who... still decided not to vote?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 5 points 8 months ago

Bernie was on every ballot. I voted for him, twice. The fact that he didn't win means nothing more than he didn't win. He had the opportunity, the voters simply didn't vote for him.

[-] Lanthanae@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

He would have won in the general. The primary is not reflective of the general electorate. This is the whole point.

[-] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 6 points 8 months ago

Maybe so, but Democrats didn't turn out to vote for him in the primary, even though they had every opportunity to do so, in every single state. Kinda makes your whole point moot.

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

this is exactly the kind of attitude that lets trump win repeatedly.

'yeah yeah, we know you don't want the candidate we're pushing but you don't get a choice.'

then 20 million people stay home.

great fucking job. Meanwhile Sanders would have won, EITHER ELECTION. great. fucking. work.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Montagge@lemmy.zip 4 points 8 months ago

Bernie ain't winning shit beyond his seat right now

[-] whithom@discuss.online 4 points 8 months ago

My heart belongs to Bernie.

The left really should actually organize and form a secret party of political actors who run as republicans to disrupt the vote.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

They should just run fake centrists in the Democratic Party and then turn all progressive when they get into office.

Like centrists did with the fake progressives Fetterman and Sinema.

[-] whithom@discuss.online 4 points 8 months ago

Let’s do both! Sneak attack

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

If we're very lucky, we can get it so it's a stealth progressive against a stealth progressive.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
253 points (100.0% liked)

politics

24989 readers
2268 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS