86
Their faces look like they're both trying to molest the same small child and they have to somehow come to an agreement over how to take turns.
Why do these types always have that child rapist look in their eyes?
I love the irony of putting two people in charge of an efficiency department. Satire is dead.
A redundant efficiency department with no direct way to make changes, it's like nominating a sex trafficker to be the attorney general or something
Or a known Russian asset to head national intelligence.
Or hiring two guys to be co-referees for the no holds barred orgy that's about to start.
They should start calling it the Department of Government Efficiency Department.
Seriously, a bunch of people who don't know the GAO exists.
But the GAO doesn't have an acronym that is also a funny meme. How is Elon meant to give a shit about it if it doesn't make the 14 year old boys laugh?
Hey it's not just a meme, it's DeCeNtRaliZeD fInAnCe. I bought some DOGE as a joke several years ago, now it is worth real money. I sold some the last time it was at $0.69, because of course I did.
I have some left, the price is currently $0.36 but maybe Elon can meme it up to $4.20 and I can retire early.
It's the GAO but with more corruption, blackjack and hookers. Oh and it's not actually part of the government.
actually, forget the GAO
Shhhh. I don't want these two anywhere near an office or department with merit.
It doesn’t matter, that’s not the point. The point is precisely that it’s not part of the government. It’s the manifestation of the sort of private capture that has made Musk so rich. They are explicitly taking a governmental responsibility - managing the budget - and moving it out of the government. Away from oversight, away from regulation, with unclear (and therefore definable by them) power and authority, free from any obligation to actually DO anything.
taking a crime and moving it somewhere else is also the entire schtick of silicon valley techbros. see, it's not a pyramid scheme or securities fraud, it's Future of Finance™. it's not copyright infringement or criminal conspiracy if it's done by chatbots, and they're not liable anyway, why have you trusted the lying boxes
They’re just disrupting governance by upleveling inefficient “budgeting” and “oversight” to a blockchain-driven web3 AI powered crypto GaaS (government as a service) product called F.A.R.T.S, or the Federal AI Recurring Transaction System. FARTS will take your dollars and give it directly to four billionaires, cutting out the inefficient “procurement” process we use now to funnel taxpayer money to rich demons.
Elons two main businesses only exist because of government handouts. 7500 electric vehicle tax credit over 100,000s of cars is well into the billions. With how close Tesla came to insolvency, the ability to reach more customers surely saved Tesla.
And spaceX (and more money for starlink) he has got billions more directly and is slated to receive even more even though SpaceX has missed deadlines over and over and the goal of propping up SpaceX was so we could have a cheaper option than Russia to getting people to the ISS is now not even on the table.
What's the over/under twitter gets government subsidies with some paper thin argument like "it's the public square of the Internet, so it's basically a park, and since we get 10x the yearly visitors than the grand canyon, we deserve 10x it's budget to help maintain our "free speech" park"
A department led by anthropomorphized ketamine and cocaine. What could go wrong?
(No idea if Ramaswamy is on coke, but he sure gives off coked-up, business school frat boy vibes)
If they say to Trump "cut FBI, cut NASA", Trump will do it, and all fund for space exploration will got to SpaceX by the way.
The DoD and NASA are the ones that pay SpaceX through government contracts. If he cuts NASA, then that is less money for SpaceX
I guess the full 25 billions$ will go to Musk/SpaceX
What?? Just... straight from Congress?? I think this kind of highlights how this efficiency department has no real power. They don't have the authority to plan or cut or divert money from NASA projects and Congress decides NASA budget.
They don’t have the authority under the current government.
A government is just a series of rules enforced by people who follow those rules. If enough people decide to ignore the rules, they can do whatever they want.
The last defense for those rules is the military, but trump wants to fire a ton of generals and appoint his own people, who won’t bat at an eye at blatant constitutional violations.
Give it a few months and the DOGE duo will probably have significant sway over budgets, regardless of how much authority they have on paper.
“Don't worry, Trump will be stopped because of the LAW”, has to be the stupidest argument that people are touting lately. When has that ever mattered?
Not with two dipshits behind the wheel, it won't.
This only matters if people in the federal government are willing to say "You don't have any legal authority to tell me to do anything and I don't want to help you, so go away" which I wouldn't count on always being the case
Of course, they'll be able to do tremendous amounts of irreparable damage to society.
You don't have to be able nor smart, to destroy.
This helps explain the low pay high workload mantra.
this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
86 points (100.0% liked)
News
23287 readers
3465 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS