766
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Lila_Uraraka 5 points 3 hours ago

And I'll be right there with Bluesky, it's so much better on every issue, significantly fewer bots, no ads, no premium version, and no AI

[-] account_93@lemm.ee 23 points 14 hours ago

99% of my Feed on Bluesky was just people saying they've left Twitter for Bluesky. No amount of suggest less of this helped.

[-] Podunk@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

Yeah thats how it was here after the reddit fiasco.

[-] rozodru@lemmy.world 21 points 12 hours ago

happens on every "new" social media platform that is similar to another social media platform. Was all over Lemmy when people were "boycotting" reddit...course most went right back to reddit when the boycotting was over.

[-] joel_feila@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago

Well i am on both. A lack of rpg and splatoon keeps me mostly on Reddit

[-] bruhsoulz@lemmy.ml 5 points 12 hours ago

Morrowind would keep me there but i dont really have much to say about it anyways in terms of posts (that hasnt already been said) so ion need it myself :3

[-] 0ops@lemm.ee 15 points 13 hours ago

Tbf, were you on lemmy last summer?

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Or on Reddit after everybody left Digg

[-] sunflowercowboy@feddit.org 5 points 11 hours ago

Lemmy is just that but Linux and reddit users

[-] psychothumbs@lemmy.world 10 points 13 hours ago

Haha there is a gigantic wave of people switching over from twitter right now, that's just what is on people's minds. The conversation will move on soon enough.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago

Just like when Threads launched and or when Reddit made the API changes. You get a flood of new users who want to talk about being new users.

[-] Psythik@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

On my feed it's just pictures of pets and people who I don't know making lists of things they like. But to be fair, I just installed the app today.

[-] foremanguy92_@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 hours ago

Not best either

[-] MehBlah@lemmy.world 15 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

I've started removing trash sites. I blocked twatter and reddit at my router.

[-] Cool_Name@lemmy.world 11 points 15 hours ago

Or... or... hear me out... everyone comes to lemmy?

[-] 96VXb9ktTjFnRi@feddit.nl 22 points 14 hours ago

You mean Mastodon?

[-] DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz 22 points 14 hours ago

Not even remotely the same kind of platform

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 24 points 18 hours ago

Ha ha ha, yeah, sure. Bluesky won't defeat xitter, at best it'll just be the "next thing" once xitter finally finishes getting rid of most of its users, which I guess will take more than 4 years from now.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

The great thing about BlueSky is how under-the-radar its flown for the last few years. Virtually no advertising. No legions of bot accounts spamming with invites and generic attention baiting posts. No |>u33y N |3io blowing up my mentions. No enshittification, because its just a primitive clone of the original Bird Site.

The more popular it gets, the less likely that'll last. BlueSky won't defeat Twitter until it becomes Twitter.

[-] capital@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

My issue with BS is it took VC money from crypto bros.

What do we think will happen when they come looking for their returns on investment?

[-] blarth@thelemmy.club 3 points 12 hours ago

It’ll only defeat X if corporations and specifically media and sports entities start using it.

[-] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 16 hours ago

I don't understand how those two things are distinct.

[-] nyctre@lemmy.world 9 points 16 hours ago

I guess they don't consider it bluesky defeating twitter if twitter is commiting suicide. Sounds like pedantry to me.

[-] Stern@lemmy.world 9 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)
[-] blarth@thelemmy.club 3 points 12 hours ago

Digg did commit suicide. I was there for it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 63 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Why people cannot see that the core problem of twitter is not that it got bought by the asshole billionaire. It's that the asshole billionaire was able to buy it.

[-] JadenSmith@sh.itjust.works 18 points 19 hours ago

Wasn't he forced to do so after trying to back out, or am I either imagining that or thinking of someone else?

[-] PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

It's a little more complex than that. He, like, was buying shares, blew past the 5% ownership disclosure point, failed to disclose, was forced to disclose his stake. He was then offered a seat on the board, didn't like the lack of control, and made a meme offer on the remaining stake to take the company private, tried to pull out, and was forced to buy the company he didn't want to buy by the board of directors who didn't want him to buy it.

He's the recent Adam Conover interview with the details: https://youtu.be/sxG2Y3E0uEY?si=r0VMY7s3iZ9uaP39

[-] CellarRat@sh.itjust.works 19 points 17 hours ago

If I recall correctly he could have backed out but he would have had to pay I think 1billion as a penalty and worse admit things didnt go his way

[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 14 points 16 hours ago

300 Billion dollar portfolio, 34 Billion dollar loss (~22 Billion after he writes it off in "taxes") and he has his own right-wing media company chocked full of nutters.

I don't think he cares much about the individual Billions much these days. Half his Tesla stock is securing his debt.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] geography082@lemm.ee 52 points 22 hours ago

It should be Mastodon. This is the same shit with a different name

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 10 points 15 hours ago

Mastodon is more of a protocol than a single service. It succeeds/fails on those terms, in the same way the old Web1.0 protocols did. Which is to say, you can't enshitify a thousand micro-sites at once like you can enshittify one big site that's under central control. But you also can't do things like navigate, search, and socialize efficiently.

Mastodon is successful in large part because it isn't. When you let a single cartel of corporate psychos run a Mastodon account like they would a Twitter or Facebook, you end up with Truth Social (literally just a Mastodon branch instance).

[-] dan@upvote.au 7 points 14 hours ago

ActivityPub is the protocol though. Mastodon is an implementation of the protocol.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] dan@upvote.au 5 points 14 hours ago

Bluesky is (in theory) federated, but I think you can't run your own server yet. We'll see if they keep their promise.

Its protocol has some improvements over ActivityPub, for example you can use a domain name you own as your username even if you're not hosting your own instance, and your user identity is portable in that case - you can move to a different instance but keep the same username.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
766 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59334 readers
4623 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS