363
submitted 2 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

Summary

Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich endorsed President-elect Donald Trump’s victory, stating it’s “time” to extend full Israeli sovereignty over the occupied West Bank.

This comes as Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu highlighted his alignment with Trump on the “Iranian threat.”

Tensions in Gaza and Lebanon have escalated following recent Israeli airstrikes, with regional leaders gathering in Riyadh to address Israeli actions.

Israeli President Isaac Herzog is set to meet President Biden, though Biden’s influence on Israel may be limited following Trump’s win.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 112 points 2 months ago

bUt hArRiS sUpPoRtS gEnOcIdE

[-] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 36 points 2 months ago

The Harris campaign made the decision to not break from Biden on Israel, at the cost of a +6 points gain. That's the fault of the campaign's calculations to ignore those voters, take them for granted, and instead run to the right with Liz Cheney and having the most lethal Military.

I voted for Harris and told others to do the same. It's still on the campaign. Blaming voters is just sowing division when we need unity and solidarity to fight against Fascism.

Quote

Our first matchup tested a Democrat and a Republican who “both agree with Israel’s current approach to the conflict in Gaza”. In this case, the generic candidates tied 44–44. The second matchup saw the same Republican facing a Democrat supporting “an immediate ceasefire and a halt of military aid and arms sales to Israel”. Interestingly, the Democrat led 49–43, with Independents and 2020 non-voters driving the bulk of this shift.

Quotes

In Pennsylvania, 34% of respondents said they would be more likely to vote for the Democratic nominee if the nominee vowed to withhold weapons to Israel, compared to 7% who said they would be less likely. The rest said it would make no difference. In Arizona, 35% said they’d be more likely, while 5% would be less likely. And in Georgia, 39% said they’d be more likely, also compared to 5% who would be less likely.

Quotes

Quotes

Quotes

Majorities of Democrats (67%) and Independents (55%) believe the US should either end support for Israel’s war effort or make that support conditional on a ceasefire. Only 8% of Democrats but 42% of Republicans think the US must support Israel unconditionally.

Republicans and Independents most often point to immigration as one of Biden’s top foreign policy failures. Democrats most often select the US response to the war in Gaza.

[-] Zorque@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

There's no one issue that, independently, could have change the outcome that no other could have as well. Blaming it on just one thing is just as ignorant as blaming it just on voters.

It's as much on the Harris campaign as the American people who didn't fucking show up, despite all the evidence that it's going to be so much worse with Trump.

Trying to say "It's anyone's fault but mine" at this stage is pointless, though... because what's done is done. We're fucked. Doing nothing but point fingers only damages us in the long run, because it's that much more energy not spent on fixing it in the future.

[-] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

I agree that pointing blame is not useful. Understanding the reasons for why voter output for the Democratic Party was depressed by over 10 million voters is in order to find a path forward.

It's ultimately on the campaign to earn those votes, they failed to with their campaign strategy. People are being squeezed with high costs of living and low wages. Business as usual is not appealing to people who want real change. The data is clear that progressive policies are popular with everyone, that includes Republicans and independents on top of Democrats. The decision to take those voters for Granted without offering them enough on the policy front, and instead move to the right, was a calculated decision by the campaign that failed. Instead, the campaign could have ran boldly on progressive policies. Especially with the Walz pick. They could have hemorrhaged the Republican base by running on policies that will improve their lives too. Such as universal healthcare, affordable public housing / housing first, increasing federal minimum wage and eliminating subminimum wage, free collage, etc. Her policy of taking on Price gouging was great, we needed a lot more of that and a lot less of things like moving to the right on immigration while campaigning with Liz Cheney.

Polls on campaign messaging

How to Win a Swing Voter in Seven Days

“The View” Alternate Universe: Break From Biden in Interviews, Play the Hits in Ads

Polls on policy

How Trump and Harris Voters See America’s Role in the World

Majority of Americans support progressive policies such as higher minimum wage, free college

Democrats should run on the popular progressive ideas, but not the unpopular ones

Here Are 7 ‘Left Wing’ Ideas (Almost) All Americans Can Get Behind

Finding common ground: 109 national policy proposals with bipartisan support

Progressive Policies Are Popular Policies

Tim Walz's Progressive Policies Popular With Republicans in Swing States

I see a lot of people preferring to blame voter demographics over recognizing how the Campaign failed to earn those votes. Now more than ever we need solidarity to protect ourselves and our communities from this rise in Fascism.

[-] OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago

Over 50% of the god damn country voted for a man who has so many major, should-be career ending flaws we don't even need to list them anymore. If he kicked a puppy it wouldn't even make the top 10 worst things he's done. The democrats lost to the stupidest president of all time, a man who's entire economic policy revolves around tariffs that he fundamentally doesn't even understand and who cannot seem to open his mouth without lying.

....and you're here dunking on the people trying to oppose America's blatant complicity in genocide. Well, you sure showed them.

[-] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago

while youre busy opposing genocide, you got someone significantly worse elected instead. Well done.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] papertowels@lemmy.one 16 points 2 months ago

Tbf the 50% that voted for trump aren't here, plain and simple, so that's why you don't see engagement with them.

The only political engagement you'll see here on Lemmy shifts overwhelmingly left for all parties, so you'll see mostly squabbling between various left factions.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

For some reason they still think they can bully people into voting for their guy. This has been thoroughly disproved but still they persist.

[-] PortoPeople@lemm.ee 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

There's a lot of stupidity reflected in these elections.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] small44@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Yes she does

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Gsus4@mander.xyz 106 points 2 months ago

Who could have predicted this???

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 91 points 2 months ago

Anyone who abstained on grounds of Harris's position on Gaza in my view have blood on their hands in what will not only assuredly he worse for Palestinians under Trump, but also the ongoing attempted genocide in Ukraine by Putin.

They may as well be Trump voters to me and I want nothing to do with them.

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 43 points 2 months ago

Most of the people spreading that bullshit here were .ml tankies and probably wanted trump elected anyway.

[-] GiveMemes@jlai.lu 36 points 2 months ago

Worse than Trump voters actually. The vast majority of Trump voters have convinced themselves that what they're doing is good, actually, and that the democrats are evil whereas the people who abstained from voting for Harris literally had a choice of a candidate that campaigned on making their number one issue worse, and one that at least attempted to talk about peace deals and decided to just have no impact whatsoever, condemning hundreds of thousands plus to certain death. They claim to be on the side of ending human suffering when in actuality, they're little piss babies that are upset that their 10% of the population doesn't have complete and total control.

[-] joker125@lemmy.world 69 points 2 months ago

LeopardsAteMyFace.

Unfortunately, this time around, for the Americans pretending to actually give damn on social meda, Gaza will be a parking lot soon.

Just as Trump proclaimed.

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

Gaza is a parking lot already.

All Trump will do is officially move the border line. The full ethnic cleansing of North Gaza is taking place under Biden this very moment.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] beanlink@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

People are just getting the consequences of their actions or inaction. My empathy bucket for all of this has broken and I don’t plan on fixing it anymore either.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 52 points 2 months ago

"We did it, Patrick! We saved Palestine!"

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 19 points 2 months ago

"Our strategy failed and our candidate lost. Quick! Start mocking people for caring about a genocide before they start getting ideas about blaming us for the mess we caused!"

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago

A shitty campaign does not excuse you from sitting back and allowing fascism to take over. You share in the blame.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago

"Dems ran a shit out-of-touch campaign, obviously this absolves all of us who were beating the 'Don't vote against the fascist' drum as hard as we could."

Believe it or not, and I understand this is quite unsettling for people with a simplistic view of the world, blame can be shared over multiple parties. Yes, really!

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 8 points 2 months ago

It sounds like you're still running their campaign for them as you gain enjoyment by mocking those opposed to supporters and enablers of genocide regardless of which tribe they belong to. That was a conscious choice from her, and this is a conscious choice from you to continue your support. She was trying to win an election, but what's your excuse?

Please scour through my post history and find where I've ever told anyone how they should vote.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

She was trying to win an election, but what’s your excuse?

Trying to avoid additional genocides here at home, and being rightfully upset that me, my friends, and loved ones are now in the sights of genocide in addition to the Palestinian genocide getting worse and Ukrainian genocide being enabled by Trump and a potential invasion of Taiwan by the CCP?

I guess that's all small stuff compared to virtue signaling over Palestine. Gotta maintain that spiritual attitude towards politics.

Please scour through my post history and find where I’ve ever told anyone how they should vote.

I don't know if you, personally, were banging the don't vote drum, and expressed no opinion on whether YOU were or not. You have, however, jumped in on a comment mocking those who thought that abstaining was in any way a moral choice and saw fit to equate that to 'mocking people for caring about genocide'.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 39 points 2 months ago

Wait, why would it make any difference if Donald is elected?

I thought everyone was saying that Biden and Harris were doing nothing about the Palestinians.

[-] zephorah@lemm.ee 32 points 2 months ago

They said they wanted a two state solution. Trump has always been a burn it to the ground guy on that topic.

Biden is Kamala’s boss, so she toes his line while VP, that’s how the job usually works, unless you’re Cheney.

So playing the odds at least there’s a chance of survival with Kamala. With Trump it’s just nuked, but without actual nukes.

But hey, Kamala wasn’t good enough so let’s go with the nukes👍

Once again, human spite has the force to move mountains.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 37 points 2 months ago

To those cowards that didn't vote: This is on you, own it you sniveling weasels.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago

And that’s why I didn’t feel like I was betraying Palestine by voting for Harris

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] kittenzrulz123 25 points 2 months ago

That finance minister is a Kahanist (Israeli fascist), he doesn't just want to annex parts of the west bank. He wants to annex all of the west bank and Gaza while renaming both. As someone living in Israel I've seen how people are already calling the west bank "Judea and Sumera". He also wants to kill all Arabs and Muslims.

[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Abstention was already ok with this

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

Abstention in Michigan had no faith the Democrats would prevent this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 20 points 2 months ago

Tankies who didn't vote for Harris: We did it! We saved Palestine!

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] maplebar@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I mean, they aren't wrong, are they?

Hamas is all but defeated, Hezbollah is also on their back foot, and even the model caliphate, Iran, has proven to be almost completely ineffective against Israel's defense system. Europe will make empty gestures about war crimes via the toothless ICC, and America is now totally controlled by the Republicans who never wanted a two-state peace process in the first place.

Israel has never in their short history had a better opportunity to go for the power play and deal with the Palestinians however they please, and under Trump we can expect that they won't get even a little bit of push back from the US, regardless of how harsh and violently they want to play it.

I expect a fucking bloodbath and a full annexation of the Gaza Strip, the West Bank, and possibly parts of southern Lebanon.

But hey, the American people have spoken, and I guess that's what they wanted.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

ITT there's a lot of people unwilling to accept the Democrats didn't prove their case. They didn't convince the Arabs they would be any better for Palestinians. They didn't convince unions they would be any better for them. And they certainly didn't convince anyone leaning truly left to vote for them by seeking Republican endorsements.

Look, I think Harris did the best anyone could with the cards she got dealt. But blaming the voters has never been a winning strategy.

[-] Clent@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Why does the blame go for Harris for not convincing people when it was clear to anyone paying attention that Trump was going to be worse?

This sounds like how people talk after being obviously wrong and not being able to accept being wrong.

If there are two paths and once says "Doom" and the other says nothing, only a fool picks the marked path. Only a fool who cannot accept responsibility blames the unmarked path for not being clearly marked "NOT Doom"

When one person says they are going to do bad shit, it's not on the other side to convince you they wont also do bad shit. The person assuming the one not talking who to doing bad shit will do it away because reasons is the problem. There is no one to blame but themselves. They will be a tool until they seize their agency and make an informed decision.

Stop being a tool.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

That's the thing though. In regards to Gaza both paths were marked "Doom". With regards to the left, courting actual Republicans clearly marked both paths "Conservative".

Your analogy depends on your point of view being everyone's point of view. This is a fundamental failing of the democrats this year. They again acted like they were the only obvious choice and nobody could possibly have a legitimate opinion otherwise.

If you ignore voters and let party elders call them Russian agents then it's not exactly rocket science that they aren't going to vote for you.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
[-] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

Brought to you in part by the voters too stupid to see the WWarmongering and accelerated genocide and the others who think it's a good thing, prophecy, or that billions won't die because idiot bullies have the bombs.

We appreciate that you come together in support of the War even with having to plan your intertwined economy failing and dragging down others, dollar replaced, rights removals, and climate fails. /s

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 12 points 2 months ago

"Accelerated genocide" is a term that fits along nicely with "enhanced interrogation." It's good to see the right-wing disinformation machine is still functioning since W. Bush left office. I wonder if Harris picked that gem up as she was courting Dick Cheney's endorsement?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

Are you actually suggesting genocide can't get worse once it's already genocide? If so, you know absolutely nothing about genocide.

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 10 points 2 months ago

Do you honestly think this is a winning argument as if those are the only two options?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

Those literally were the only two options. It's a two-party system. Sorry.

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 10 points 2 months ago

Genocide and genocide? How about xenophobia and xenophobia? Pro-corporate anti-worker and pro-corporate anti-worker? We may be limited on parties, but they decide their platforms.

You can continue to support the Democrats shift further and further right, but it isn't winning them any elections, so you're just handing victories to the Republicans because they already occupy that space. It gave us Trump in 2016, nearly again in 2020, and now again in 2024. It's also given them the Senate, likely the House, and with the Supreme Court. How much more are you willing to give Republicans before you're ready to hold the DNC accountable?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FelixCress@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

Fucking war criminals

[-] small44@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

Israel is already controlling the West bank directly with settlements and indirectly with the Palestinians authority who arrest resistance leaders but do nothing to defend Palestinians

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
363 points (100.0% liked)

World News

40340 readers
3107 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS