369
epic ratio rule (lemmy.cafe)
submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by spujb@lemmy.cafe to c/196

Lemmy is a worse platform for women than Reddit was EDIT this link is an OLD POST that contains my thesis on the state of lemmy and is not the context of the much more recent comment in the screenshot. sorry for any confusion caused by this juxtaposition, my main goal with having this linked is to expose how nothing has improved

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 63 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

OOP was downvoted for a non-sequitur on top of a strawman.

When their original argument was refuted they posted what OP posted above as if it was a relevant comeback.

OP is a malignant poster leaving out context.

[-] drake@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

~~link, please?~~ Edit: found it.

Seems like pretty typical self-centred reply-guy behaviour, then all the men downvoting got annoyed because the person fighting on behalf of women in this interaction refused to entertain the implication that men are owed sex by women

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 days ago

Nobody said women owed anything. They are saying that collectively punishing men for things they did not do is a fast track to creating more incels.

[-] drake@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Hello, thanks for your reply, I appreciate that we can have a civil conversation about a topic that can be quite heated. I’m a man, so I definitely can’t speak for women, but I try my best to listen, and I can try to pass on what I’ve learned!

You’re totally right that nobody in the screenshot wrote the words “men are owed sex by women”, but if you’ll give me the benefit of the doubt, I think there’s something a little deeper at play here, and I think it really depends on your perspective.

Rather than explain it directly, it might be easier to use an example - let’s say that you have a friend who you don’t want to have sex with. If that friend is really nice to you, and you don’t have sex with them, are you punishing them?

If that friend said something like, “You know, if you don’t have sex with us, we might become more violent and dangerous…” how do you think that would make you feel?

Personally, I would feel a bit scared by that sort of statement - I feel that it’s coercive, and it has a kind of veiled threat of violence there that makes me uncomfortable.

I hope that helps explain why some people might read the message differently from how you read it.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works 157 points 5 days ago

Oh, and since the exact people your post is about simply can't help themselves and are already pouring in to mansplain and make excuses for themselves, the obligatory:

the comments on any article about feminism justify feminism

[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 47 points 5 days ago

I post some feminist shit, or at least critiques of men, and the comments are as expected.

[-] ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works 56 points 5 days ago

Every.

Fucking.

Time.

And if I know the post you mean, it reminds me a lot of that gillette ad from a couple of years back, basically telling men they can do better, for each other if nothing else, and they came out in droves to shout that actually, they really fucking can't.

Patriarchy and the privilege it grants are one hell of a drug..

[-] MeaanBeaan@lemmy.world 37 points 5 days ago

I cannot imagine being so insecure with your manness that you feel the need to protest a razor commercial asking you to be a better dude.

I've been afflicted with Manhood my whole life. And razor ads asking me to be better doesn't threaten me. In fact, they're right, I can be a better man. I should go do the dishes; just after I feel better. This debilitating minor cold is getting me real down.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] DragonsInARoom@lemmy.world 50 points 4 days ago
[-] spujb@lemmy.cafe 23 points 4 days ago

the sick part is there isn’t even profit to be had here on lemmy :( so it’s all for nothing and i guess since fedi is modeled after for-profit platforms the same patterns play out

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SattaRIP 95 points 5 days ago

"Not all men, but definitely this fucking guy," moment

[-] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 34 points 4 days ago

Seeing the state if discourse in the B4 movement threads makes it so obvious that the present community on lemmy is wildly sexist and misogynistic. Like how egotistical and selfish do you have to be to see a movement that is a rational response to women having their bodily autonomy taken away from them in real time, and interpret that situation in a way where you perceive it as a threat to your personal chances of getting laid?

You could be seeing this movement and choosing to recognize that it is coming from a place of justified fear, anger, and suffering of women all over the country, and decide, "This situation is wrong, we need to fight this." It's not hard. Just be an ally.

[-] spujb@lemmy.cafe 20 points 4 days ago

chad ✅: wow this is insane behavior to see as a man but i understand that women would not be doing this unless the situation was really dire. i am open to listening first and will keep my knee jerk judgements private at least at first.

virgin ❌: wow this is insane behavior to see as a man, and this kind of shit is literally why you women experience sexism in the first place. actions (self preservation and solidarity) have consequences (sexism and radicalization). don’t mind me as i fill this entire thread about women asking to be heard with my hot takes on the situation 🤓☝️

[-] Aksamit@slrpnk.net 6 points 3 days ago

Replace 'virgin' with 'potential rapist' and you've got it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] noahimesaka1873@lemmy.funami.tech 15 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

No, seriously, that movement is not justified at all. It's full of transphobia, homophobia, and on top of all this racism expected from Korea of course. They harassed trans people going to women's university, death threat included of course, and also harasses any trans individuals appearing on timeline via QRT/Reply/etc. You should think about this when you talk about that movement.

Some good reads (though on twitter sadly): https://x.com/codud066/status/1855670602985873464 https://x.com/muntamor/status/1855683991262908714

EDIT: The last part was a bit rude, so toned it down a bit. Anyways, as trans individual living in Korea unfortunately, I do feel very unsafe (and had a panic attack) by those kinds of people.

[-] spujb@lemmy.cafe 12 points 4 days ago

i totally hear your concerns, it’s sort of a weird situation because the name is being adopted from an entirely different cultural context by people who might have just heard about it this week

i will say that all the genuine circles i have seen expressing interest in 4b have done their research and are outspoken about rejecting transphobia and only retaining the good parts in their practice, so that’s heartening :)

That's hopeful to hear. The concept of the movement itself is decent, so I hope those don't go the way of TERF like here in Korea.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 63 points 5 days ago

Ugh.

I just wish misogynistic comments/voice logs could be taped to abusers' foreheads.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 34 points 5 days ago

How is that getting downvoted? What community is that? Dumb as fuck.

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 38 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I'm suspicious. I'd like to know other comments that person has made. They might be a troll and that comment has nothing to do with the topic it's in.

Also, good work Google AI. /s

edit: yeah, I can't find the source of that comment.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] yuri@pawb.social 17 points 4 days ago

i straight up blocked lemmy.world after the “strange man or a bear” thing blew up, and i realized LITERALLY THE ONLY PEOPLE arguing in favor of the man were all coincidentally on that instance.

honestly very incel-y

[-] KombatWombat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I really suggest people don't block it. Lemmy needs active users and communities engaging with each other and while it is going to have some crazies just from how many people are on it, it should also be the least vulnerable to group think. When I hear of another instance defederating I always suspect it of being a fringe echo chamber.

Honestly though I would defend the man too. Take from that what you will, but I'll just say it's usually good to be exposed to people who disagree with you.

[-] yuri@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago

i respect your perspective, i’m absolutely not unblocking it tho.

it’s not the fact that they defended the man, it’s the way they were doing it. my experience has been wholly more enjoyable post-block, and i’d recommend anyone else in my shoes do the same thing.

i saw too much bad faith engagement to validate staying around in spite of “a few bad apples”. for a hot minute if it was posted on .world then anyone arguing for the bear in the comments would get dogpiled and downvoted to shit, and to me that was indicative of a larger problem than just “being too popular”

[-] KombatWombat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Fair enough.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 5 days ago

So are bears back on the menu?

[-] Kit 18 points 5 days ago

They never went away according to my Grindr feed.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
369 points (100.0% liked)

196

16500 readers
2817 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS