37
submitted 1 week ago by rbn@sopuli.xyz to c/treehuggers@slrpnk.net

Welcome to the challenge for November 9th which is the 3rd one so far after #8 and this post with the original idea.

Warning: Comments may contain spoilers, so only read them once you're ready.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago
[-] rbn@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 week ago
[-] NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Nice! I knew it immediately because I see them a lot when I hike. They are very well protected by some extremely sharp spikes.

[-] rbn@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

spoilerIt's not a nut in the botanical sense but if we stay strictly within those boundaries there's not enough variety. ;)

[-] jxk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago
[-] rbn@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

Perfect - Castanea sativa ๐ŸŽ‰

[-] Peasley@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

!Chinquapin!< is the best i can do without cheating

[-] rbn@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

Great! My image is a pretty small castanea sativa (sweet chestnut), while the chinquapin is listed as castanea pumila (dwarf chestnut). So for me (as a non-biologist) that's the same! ๐Ÿ‘‘

[-] Peasley@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Thanks!

I'm from California where we have Golden Chinquapin (chrysolepis chrysophylla) which has fruit that looks the same, and leaves that are very similar (though with golden hairs on the undersides)

Looking them up, they are closely related to castanea. They also have edible seeds but the spiny shell is hard to get open.

this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
37 points (100.0% liked)

Tree Huggers

598 readers
1 users here now

A community to discuss, appreciate, and advocate for trees and forests. Please follow the SLRPNK instance rules, found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS