443
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] superkret@feddit.org 55 points 1 month ago

If you want a clear definition, ask a mathematician:

A word is any written product of group elements and their inverses.

Or a computer scientist:

A word is a fixed-sized datum handled as a unit by the instruction set or the hardware of the processor.

[-] folekaule@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago
[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 month ago

Maybe ironically, neither one would be appropriate as a linguistic definition.

[-] affiliate@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

i wonder what the inverse of the letters in the english alphabet are. since it has a non-prime number of letters (26 to be exact), we know that some letters won’t have inverses. i wonder which letters don’t have inverses. i guess it would be pretty easy to find out if you use the standard alphabet ordering and then port the alphabet over to ℤ/26ℤ, but that’s not a particularly satisfying answer.

[-] Malgas@beehaw.org 3 points 1 month ago

Or, in either field (formal language theory bridges both) it can mean any string of symbols, letters, or tokens.

[-] four@lemmy.zip 34 points 1 month ago

"word" is a four letter word

[-] lugal@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 month ago

Please, it's w*rd, we want to keep this f*mily friendly

[-] tdawg@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago
[-] lugal@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Watch your l*nguage, my dear

[-] dessimbelackis@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

I think you’ll find that in actual fact “bird” is the word

[-] prex@aussie.zone 4 points 1 month ago
[-] spicytuna62@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Don't you know? About the bird?

[-] pseudo@jlai.lu 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The definition still applies.

[-] Entropywins@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

And it begins...probably be 2 days until I get the song out of my head

[-] orb360@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

My body is ready!

[-] angrystego@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Birds are not real, though, are they?

[-] railwhale@lemmy.nz 4 points 1 month ago

Recursive ~~acronyms~~ definitions

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

that's a bit wordy

[-] lugal@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 month ago

Still even people new to writing have a good intuition about that but formalizing this intuition is a different story

[-] carotte 14 points 1 month ago
[-] deaf_fish@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago

And I love them for it. Seriously comfortable society is built on and by nerds.

[-] slice@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah I love it too. It was quite an interesting deep dive into that topic.

[-] chemicalwonka@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 month ago

Saussure feelings

[-] wandermind@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 month ago

As a linguist, I'd just shrug.

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 month ago

"everyone knows what a word is, that is the definion"

[-] shneancy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

the cries of alien archaeologists from the far future echo in the distance

[-] Hupf@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago

What is Truth and what is God?

this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
443 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

11453 readers
439 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS