201
top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] JoeKrogan@lemmy.world 42 points 5 hours ago

Just a reminder you can add a publisher to your steam ignore list such as EA or Ubisoft.

[-] sp6@lemmy.world 20 points 4 hours ago

If you accidentally ban linux users in three[1] different[2] banwaves[3], then linux was only halfway supported in the first place, even if they overturned (almost) all of those bans.

I think the real reason they did it was EA's financial situation. Since money is tight, the amount of resources they were willing to put into real linux anti-cheat probably dropped to "none at all," and now we're here. Otherwise other cheater-prone games like Counter Strike, Overwatch, Halo, The Finals, DayZ, Hunt Showdown, etc would have probably dropped/blocked linux by now too.

[-] turbowafflz@lemmy.world 119 points 7 hours ago

The fact that companies think client side anti cheat is a good idea is so insane. Maybe try designing your server better instead of blaming the operating system for not letting you control your users

[-] nekusoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de 4 points 1 hour ago

Aside from better server side detection, which is I agree is severely underdeveloped, I'd say that the next big step should be a much bigger reliance on reputation-based matchmaking, ideally across games. It would need to be built in a way that's not abusable by devs or trolls and should be as privacy-respecting as much as possible (as in, not having to validate with your ID South-Korean style), which isn't an easy task. Working properly however, it would keep honest players from seeing any cheaters at all with no client-side anticheat required at all, which would be nice.

[-] KLISHDFSDF@lemmy.ml 31 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Genuinely curious, because this isn't my area of expertise, but how do you design a server to be "better" if it has to trust data from a remote client?

Example, if the client is compromised - because as they've said, they have no way to "attest" that the kernel is not compromised - how would the server know any better?

If my Apex client tells the server I got a perfect headshot, how would the server know I didn't fake the data? Is there a real answer to this problem or are we just wishing they come up with an impossible solution?

My general understanding is that EA is 100% correct. Now, on the other hand, maybe the should just limit plays between Linux <-> Linux so people can at least still enjoy the game (I'm moving to Linux soon so I'll basically no longer be able to play the game, which is, as my primary gaming addiction, a huge loss I'm willing to take).

There's compromises EA could take, but I think the Linux market share is just too small for them to care to spend any resources - even though they're raking in billions (~$3.4 Billion) and could spare a few resources to find a good middle ground. Capitalism at it's finest.

Genuinely curious, because this isn't my area of expertise, but how do you design a server to be "better" if it has to trust data from a remote client?

Check the data on the server ("oh no, incredibly expensive"). Don't give any data to the client it doesn't need, like enemies around the corner ("oh no, now my game is so very laggy because caching and future position assumption just became impossible")

Example, if the client is compromised - because as they've said, they have no way to "attest" that the kernel is not compromised - how would the server know any better?

Now the server doesn't need to care. There's input? Validate and use it.

If my Apex client tells the server I got a perfect headshot, how would the server know I didn't fake the data? Is there a real answer to this problem or are we just wishing they come up with an impossible solution?

Now the client can go pound sand. Server decides if it's a headshot. Client only sends coordinates of origin and target. Lag? Sucks to be you, with or without cheat.

My general understanding is that EA is 100% correct. Now, on the other hand, maybe the should just limit plays between Linux <-> Linux so people can at least still enjoy the game

That would only create more work for the developers, all for the defacto expulsion of Linux users (Way less players at all times). The best course of action here would be the actual expulsion of Linux users. Also, EA is at most 25% correct. (Not a rational argument, I just very much dislike them)

(I'm moving to Linux soon so I'll basically no longer be able to play the game, which is, as my primary gaming addiction, a huge loss I'm willing to take).

Damn, sorry to hear that. It's always bad to leave something one knows because something's become unbearable. I wish you best of luck on your journey! (I'm assuming a lot, but why else would you switch despite your choice of use of free time?)

There's compromises EA could take, but I think the Linux market share is just too small for them to care to spend any resources - even though they're raking in billions (~$3.4 Billion) and could spare a few resources to find a good middle ground. Capitalism at it's finest.

On the other hand: I quite like it. It forces them to keep their grubby little hands from my kernel.

I do not like anything anti cheat. But I also don't really like cheaters, especially in online games, so anti cheat could be tolerated. The only thing is: nothing trumps my systems integrity. Definitely not online player satisfaction.

[-] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 8 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

The fact that this thoughtful comment was downvoted, while the computer illiterate reply was upvoted, speaks to the hive mind on this ~~subreddit~~. We all detest EA, but this guy has a legitimate point.

[-] SadSadSatellite@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago

"In this subreddit"

Yeah I have a hell of a time remembering what Lemmy things are called as well.

[-] yeahiknow3@lemmings.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Damn, what are they called?

[-] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 hour ago

Communities or "comms". Reddit would be quick to legal action if someone started using their trademarks.

[-] SadSadSatellite@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago

I think they're supposed to be magazines, but I've been saying subs for.like 12 years. Mags, I guess.

Maybe çubs?

[-] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 hours ago

Communities. Magazines is what kbin calls them though.

That makes a lot more sense. I was wondering why c/ stood for magazine.

[-] Evotech@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago
[-] cm0002@lemmy.world 20 points 5 hours ago

If my Apex client tells the server I got a perfect headshot, how would the server know I didn't fake the data?

Any game that works like that is fundamentally flawed and AC is nothing but an attempt at a cheap bandaid at best.

The client should be doing nothing but rendering and sending player actions to the server and the server should be managing the game state as well as running its checks on those actions. And when one client sends actuons that are weird and doesn't line up with it's internal game state it should kick the client immediately always deferring to what ITS game state is telling it, not the client.

[-] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago

The cheat in this case would send legitimate actions. Like maybe you, the human, would have missed the headshot, but your cheat corrected to the inputs that would have landed one.

[-] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 27 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Your core premise is broken. Relying on trusting anything from a remote client cannot possibly result in a fair game.

[-] Evotech@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

It's not that simple. Especially not for real time shooters, latency is a killer.

[-] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

It is that simple. You already have to account for latency because everyone but one player (who you also can't trust no matter how many rootkits you install) is not the server.

Client side validation cannot possibly provide any actual security, but even if that wasn't the case and it was actually flawless, it would still be unconditionally unacceptable for a game to ever have kernel level access.

[-] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 3 points 6 hours ago

Too bad the server at least needs the player input data.

[-] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 hours ago

Yes, people can still cheat with a camera and manipulating inputs. There will never be a way around that.

But that's entirely unchanged by adding malware, that, even if it could theoretically work, should be a literal crime with serious jail time attached. Client side validation is never security and cannot resemble security.

[-] andyburke@fedia.io 3 points 5 hours ago

There are ways to detect and stop that, but they can and should happen on the server, not on the client.

[-] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago

Only if you're OK banning real people.

[-] andyburke@fedia.io 2 points 3 hours ago

There are lots of options such that you can tune your false positive/negative rate. 🤷‍♂️ Tons of ways you can structure this depending on your game's tech.

[-] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

No options that resemble legitimate or evidence based in any way.

If a computer has the exact same input and output tools as a human, you cannot possibly do better than guessing. It is a literal certainty that you will ban legitimate players doing nothing wrong for being too good if you try, and it's unconditionally not acceptable to do so.

[-] andyburke@fedia.io 2 points 3 hours ago

Client side anti-cheat faces similar issues, and there unlike your server you don't control the hardware.

[-] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

I'm not sure why you think I'm saying client side is better when I called it malware.

There is no approach that is theoretically capable of doing anything at all to impact a camera and automated inputs, and there is no way of trying to do so that is acceptable. It's simply a reality of online gaming.

[-] turbowafflz@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

They should just use the same approach big minecraft servers use, the game itself has no anticheat, but the server makes sure the data it's getting from the client makes sense and kicks clients sending weird data. Doing any checks client side will always be insecure and a nuisance to players

[-] Evotech@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Yeah there's no Minecraft cheats /s

[-] unlawfulbooger 7 points 6 hours ago

how do you design a server to be “better” if it has to trust data from a remote client?

Because it doesn’t have to.

[-] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 hours ago

how do you design a server to be "better" if it has to trust data from a remote client?

By minimising the trusted data exchanged and checking it against server side data.

[-] helios@social.ggbox.fr 65 points 7 hours ago
[-] KLISHDFSDF@lemmy.ml 8 points 6 hours ago

I've been praying for an Open source Apex clone that can be self-hosted. A man can dream.

[-] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago

fr, Apex is one of their nicer products that felt a bit like new battle royal version of abandoned Unreal Tournament

[-] Kroxx@lemm.ee 18 points 6 hours ago

Is this not the game I saw an article about like yesterday saying EA had missed revenue forecasts and EA stated a major overhaul is needed?

I guess step one is to restrict the player base more.

[-] Pavidus@lemmy.world 20 points 7 hours ago

This must be the drastic change to increase monetization they were talking about just yesterday.

[-] EdgeRunner@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 7 hours ago

Well, I'm happy in a way i can't go back in it...

F. Them

[-] ElectroLisa 1 points 4 hours ago

They're probably adding EA anti-cheat and that's why they say they're removing the Steam Deck support

[-] lemmur@szmer.info 1 points 5 hours ago

Wasn't Apex Legends the game, that run better in wine than natively on windows?

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Oh no. Anyways.

this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
201 points (100.0% liked)

Linux Gaming

15177 readers
530 users here now

Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.

This page can be subscribed to via RSS.

Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.

Resources

WWW:

Discord:

IRC:

Matrix:

Telegram:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS