935
(page 8) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 89 points 1 day ago

I’ve had people telling me that I have “blood on [my] hands” because I’m voting for Harris. It’s insane. These people have no fucking concept.

If Harris wins, it will be by razor-thin margin. If she loses, trump wins. If trump wins, the genocide will get cranked up to 11. So voting 3rd party means even MORE “blood on my hands” than a Harris vote.

At least with Harris, there’s a CHANCE she can be reasoned with and stop the bloodshed.

These “Harris = genocide” people are liars, just trying to get trump elected - to sabotage this country.

There is a world where abstaining could be a reasonable approach. That world probably disappeared before I was born.

[-] pivot_root@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

Even if that 1 to 10 scale was in magnitudes (10^n), 11 would still be an understatement for what Donald Dump would encourage Israel and Russia to do.

[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 137 points 1 day ago

I’m not even convinced it’s even real leftists posting this stuff. It often seems like astroturfing. Not only would fake leftists possibly sway undecided voters, but they also tarnish any positivity the left deserves. Win-win for the right.

[-] Lauchs@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago

I'd like to think you're right.

But I have heard borderline stuff like this in real life from people whom I know are solid progressives. (Admittedly, these are folks on my soccer team who are almost 2 decades younger than me. I can't imagine what ending their teens during a pandemic was like so I kind of expect their politics to be wildly different.)

[-] grue@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago

"Borderline" is entirely different. Voting for Harris while being salty about it is a perfectly reasonable thing real progressives should do, and it's exactly the opposite of what these astroturf third-party propagandists are calling for even if the (alleged) sentiment is adjacent. That "border" is a knife edge and the difference between a genuine progressive and a[n effectively] pro-Trump useful idiot comes down to which side of it they fall off.

[-] Lauchs@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

That's absolutely true and very well put. Doing the right thing and being happy about it are two very different beasts.

Thank you!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Astroturfing exists to poison the minds of on lookers. If useful idiots didn't adopt the warped logic they wouldn't astroturf.

[-] Lauchs@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

It blows my mind that people are dumb enough for it to work but in an era of razor tight electoral margins, even a few idiots can matter.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 96 points 1 day ago

It's all the fault of the Democrats. If they had run Bernie he would have been voted in and we wouldn't be here.

The fact that Bernie endorses Harris is meaningless, because he's not a real Socialist.

Things I've heard today on Lemm.ee

[-] Lauchs@lemmy.world 57 points 1 day ago

Ahaha, you had me terrified for a sec there.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Funkwonker 20 points 1 day ago

What bothers me about the people taking the bit of time and effort to go vote for 3rd parties is that there's really no point to it. Making sure your own vote doesn't matter is insane to me when voting isn't mandatory. They could've just done nothing and achieved the same outcome.

[-] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago

tbf if you don't live in a swing state, your vote doesn't really matter either way

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Anamnesis@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

If you're not in a swing state, and Harris is going to win your state easily, it's fine to vote for a third party. If there's even a slim chance she is going to lose your state, you can't justify it. Harm reduction, guys.

[-] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

harm reduction has a specific meaning. voting is not harm reduction.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

There is no such thing as "not a swing state" in this election. Take it from me, a Georgian: in 2020, my state wasn't a swing state until all of a sudden it was. If people here took your advice, the Democrats would've lost the Senate that year.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] taiyang@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

As a Californian I'd have agreed with you except I think even a vote here signals something we need: the dire need to get rid of the electrical college. If Harris wins the national popular vote 60-40, it's even more obvious how busted it is. She wins Senate and House? You might see change. At least, as likely as a 60-40 win, lol.

That said, let's be honest, Green hasn't deserved a vote in decades. I really wish they'd try smaller races they could win and build momentum.

[-] shadowfax13@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

an active genocider running with the policy of continuing it getting 60% of popular vote will be the most shameful thing in our history.

[-] lemonmelon@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Even in your hypothetical, Trump getting ~40% of the popular vote in that scenario is more shameful.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Anamnesis@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Sending an electoral college message is a decent argument. I'm not persuaded about the house and senate argument though. In my case, I may not vote for Harris, because as somebody from Washington, she's not gonna lose Washington. But I'm voting for a bunch of downballot Dems because they're better progressives on a bunch of issues that Harris is not a good on. If it were even within fifteen points in Washington I'd vote for her, but I don't want to vote for genocide if I don't have to.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Bacano@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Tiiiired of the same loser rhetoric of voting for the lesser evil of two consistently deteriorating parties.

Dummies, where will it end? Put these corporate cock suckers on notice. Do not legitimize their rule with your lips.

End the duopoliticial tyranny. Used to be whig party vs democratic party. Used to.

[-] gerbler@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago

You don't end the duopoly by voting third party. You end it by organising between elections. But it's so much easier to virtue signal now and then lay back on the couch for the next 3.5 years plus you get the smug sense of self-satisfaction!

[-] lightrush@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Also the last democratic presidency has sucked a lot less corporate than previously.

[-] Saleh@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

Well we tried that by demanding proper primaries and putting non genocide candidates on the ballots. And we got called being Trump shills for that. We also got called Trump shills for saying Biden is clearly too old for office. If it wasnt for Harris to replace Biden, the race would already be over.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago

I haven’t done the math. Assuming full support, is there a 3rd party candidate on the ballot in enough states to actually win?

[-] seaQueue@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago

The last time a 3rd party candidate had an actual shot (and it was a looooong shot at best) was in 1992 when Ross Perot ran. He split the R vote badly enough that it handed the election to Clinton.

So long as we're using first past the post a 3rd party candidate has a vanishingly small chance of doing anything other than helping elect the opposition.

[-] athairmor@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

And the lesson the Republican Party learned from that was to support the Greens—or any vaguely left party—hard.

[-] Lauchs@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Admittedly, watching PR play out across the rest of the world kinda scares me. Israel is paralyzed into a destructive war because the ruling party is in a coalition with a few crazy extremists who will bring down the government (and thus expose Netenyahu to criminal trial) if their increasingly wild demands aren't met. Germany's having a clusterfuck of a time etc.

While there would be different parties, imagine the horribleness of a PR system right now in America. You could easily see a scenario where RFK acts as kingmaker and gets to demand whatever from trump or Harris. Given that trump would sell his children (maybe sub Melania for Ivanka) for the presidency, who knows what insanity would ensue? And there would be no real mechanism between the election and the next one to reign them in.

I didn't think there was anything scarier than a trump presidency until thinking that one through. Uggggh.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] verdigris@lemmy.ml 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

No. Because even if they carried 100% of the vote in a state, the delegates can and most likely would just cast their votes for one of the major parties.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] elbucho@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Nope. The Green party's got their candidate on the most states' ballots, and they only managed to get 38 states. Granted, it's still mathematically possible, considering the threshold is 270 votes, and the states that have Stein on the ballot comprise 440 votes... but still. Would be incredibly, almost impossibly difficult.

[-] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago

It doesn't even matter whether or not the Green party is technically able to win. As long as America has this first-past-the-post voting system, people will have to tactically vote for Democrats, because otherwise the Republicans will win. To stop the current duopoly, there needs to be an electoral reform first. It's probably nearly impossible to get that through but there's no other way.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
935 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

5391 readers
3647 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS