225

Ex-Republican Candidate Has Bonkers Defense for Stealing Ballots (newrepublic.com)

submitted 2 weeks ago by geekwithsoul@lemm.ee to c/politics@lemmy.world

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

“If you go to Payless, or go wherever, it says sample and you usually can take a sample,” Savage said, according to Fox59. “So that is the way I took it. I thought they were fake fucking ballots.”

Speaking with Fox59, Savage claimed that he was an elected official and that he was “just trying to fight for our country.” (Savage, a businessman, came sixth out of eight candidates in the Republican primary.)

Madison County Prosecutor Rodney Cummings said that Savage’s act was a deliberate attempt to “undermine our election process.”

top 19 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 79 points 2 weeks ago

Is this dude stealing shoes from Payless?

[-] Samsonreturns@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago

There is a local liquor store called Payless Liquor... Got a strong feeling that's who he is talking about

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 23 points 2 weeks ago

Yes

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 weeks ago

Well until they had to close up shop because he stole all their shoes.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 37 points 2 weeks ago

If you go to Payless, ...

Nobody has been able to "go" to Payless since 2019.

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 15 points 2 weeks ago

“Are you guys on MySpace, or…”

[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

I switched to Spacebook

[-] phar@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago

We get it, you're from space Australia

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

Ima super saiyan.

[-] Cptmurph616@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 weeks ago

I’d hate to defend this chucklefuck, but Payless is the name for some Kroger grocery stores in Indiana.

[-] Samsonreturns@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

There is a liquor store chain called Payless Liquor

[-] Cptmurph616@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

If the old owner of Payless Liquors was still alive, he’d probably give free booze to this bozo for stealing ballots

[-] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago

Shitty thing done shittily. Still more worried about the ones who aren't incompetent clowns but good to know that whoever's supervising isn't completely blind.

[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 weeks ago

Isn’t this the guy recorded on live video asking if they were real or fake, and after being assured they were real, waited until nobody was watching, looked around, then grabbed the two ballots and hid them, and was later filmed telling another guy that the ballots were off by two, and that he had them?

How exactly does that LIVE video footage match his story?

[-] geekwithsoul@lemm.ee 8 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, that pretty much sums it up. There's no way to reconcile what he's saying with the video evidence.

Several citizens were permitted to run “test” ballots through machines assigned to their county, including Savage, who was spotted on camera folding the ballots into his pocket while confirming with an election official that they were “absolutely, totally real ballots.” Although they weren’t official ballots, the ballots did not say “fake” or “sample” and were being tracked and counted by the state.

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

It is weird that they were called samples. But he can't have been "trying to fight for our country" while simultaneously believing they were fake ballots, so, get jailed loser

[-] Hayduke@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

He is full of shit, for sure. But let's say we take his claim at face value, that level of stupidity has no business in political power. So, lose-lose.

That is on par with most of political scandals and the defenses given, they are either clearly in on the fuckery, or so monumentally stupid that they were unaware of it happening around them or that it was illegal/immoral. There is no answer that gets them off the hook and provides confidence in their abilities.

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

The New Republic - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

Information for The New Republic:

Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that The New Republic is generally reliable. Most editors consider The New Republic biased or opinionated. Opinions in the magazine should be attributed.

MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America

The New York Times - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

Information for The New York Times:

Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that The New York Times is generally reliable. WP:RSOPINION should be used to evaluate opinion columns, while WP:NEWSBLOG should be used for the blogs on The New York Times's website. The 2018 RfC cites WP:MEDPOP to establish that popular press sources such as The New York Times should generally not be used to support medical claims.

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America

Search topics on Ground.News

https://newrepublic.com/post/187711/ex-republican-candidate-defense-stealing-ballots
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/05/07/us/elections/results-indiana-us-house-5-primary.html

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

[-] beefbot 4 points 2 weeks ago

Larry L. Savage Jr. in Indiana

this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024

225 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19089 readers

3405 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News