1753
How dare you... (lemmy.world)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 68 points 3 weeks ago

Hey, we don't know they're sexist. Perhaps they're racist.

[-] AquaTofana@lemmy.world 33 points 3 weeks ago

Lil Column "A", Lil Column "B"

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 39 points 2 weeks ago

Obama had to be polite, intelligent, and well-spoke, or else he'd be considered too "hood" for the White House, Trump has had no such requirement.

If Obama or Harris had shown up with their five kids from three different marriages, it would be the ultimate proof that the "Lessers are breeding like crazy!" and they would be condemned by the bigots on Right and the "I'm not racist, but..." on the Left|

When Trump did it, he was just seen as a family man.

[-] NormalPerson@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

-Hosts dinner

-Cold shitty McDonald's

I would've ordered some pizza and left that bullshit

[-] Cleggory@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago

Most competent and qualified genocider #girlboss 💕. Her form of genocide is much more elegant than her opponent's.

[-] LePoisson@lemmy.world 23 points 3 weeks ago

Cool so I assume you're voting for Harris then? She obviously is the candidate who would cause less harm to the people of Gaza and Palestinians in general.

So it'd be pretty dumb to say something like that and then not try to do what you can as an individual to help (by voting for Harris).

[-] Cleggory@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

You assume correctly! Like you, I am simp-pathetic to upholding the genocidal status quo.

It'd be pretty dumb not to blame anyone except those that nominated Harris, the best and only possible candidate to beat Trump.

It would be outright dimwitted to believe any other course of action exists besides voting to show one's undying loyalty to career politicians who uphold the beautiful and completely non-toxic American status quo.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago

Feel free to take a break from the endless sarcasm and let us know what course of action you think people should be taking and what would get them to take it.

load more comments (32 replies)
[-] WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago

Strange how you only complain about her regarding this issue, when drump would 1000 time worse for the Palestinians.

[-] Cleggory@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Strange how a woman could complain about her abusive partner, when there exists another man who is "1000 times" more abusive. What a selfish and dumb woman.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] wanderingmagus@lemm.ee 15 points 3 weeks ago

I hope people like you are the first people put in the camps if the other one wins because of you.

[-] Cleggory@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

Imagine hoping for people you disagree with to "be put in camps" while thinking you're different and better than fascists.

I hope people like you are the first people put in the camps

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] mrslt@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

Clearly, you'd prefer someone who would attack his own nation's people. Because obviously, that's preferable. /s

[-] Cleggory@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Attacking friendlies is bad, except when Israel does it?

reported Israeli military attacks against US military and UN peacekeepers:

October 11, 2024: Israeli military fired on UN peacekeepers in southern Lebanon, injuring two Sri Lankan soldiers and one Indonesian soldier. The Israeli military acknowledged responsibility for the incident.
October 10, 2024: Israeli military fired on UN peacekeepers in southern Lebanon, injuring two members of the peacekeeping force. The UNIFIL (United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon) reported that Israeli tanks had deliberately fired at and disabled monitoring cameras prior to the attack.
October 11, 2024: Israeli military struck a UN peacekeeper position in southern Lebanon, wounding two peacekeepers. The UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres condemned the attack, calling it a “grave violation of international humanitarian law.”
October 13, 2024: Israeli tanks forced entry into a UNIFIL position in southern Lebanon, according to the UN. The UNIFIL reported that Israeli forces had destroyed the position’s main gate and forcibly entered the position.
October 14, 2024: Israeli military attacked a Christian town in northern Lebanon, killing at least 21 people, including civilians and UN peacekeepers. The UN Secretary-General condemned the attack, calling it a “grave violation of international humanitarian law.”
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] lazerCovenant@lemm.ee 22 points 3 weeks ago

No scandals other than the genocide thing.

[-] SelfProgrammed@lemmy.world 71 points 3 weeks ago

Because Trump is so Pro-Palestine. /s

[-] lazerCovenant@lemm.ee 15 points 3 weeks ago

So, it's only bad when a Republican does it? Wow.

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 40 points 3 weeks ago

Funny, I thought the president was in charge of foreign policy. Good to know it was actually the VP's job all along.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Harvey656@lemmy.world 30 points 3 weeks ago

The issue is spreading negativity right before an election, it's best to wait until after for these comments.

[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yeah those, checks notes, victims of genocide can wait obviously.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 8 points 3 weeks ago

Will be interesting to see the floodgates that open on November 6th.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] shadowfax13@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 weeks ago

what a moronic and inhumane reply.

or maybe there isn’t anything sensible to defend this. biden, trump, harris all need to be jailed for life. but because there are all part of same scheme we are left with this scam. i won’t be surprised if biden like kissinger gets noble peace prize for murdering hundreds of thousands of civilians and children.

[-] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

So they're equally terrible on that issue? You could choose to believe that, but I suspect that Kamala's weaselly policy of "promoting a ceasefire" is not as bad as Trump's consistently zionist anti-muslim stances. Believe what you like.

You've got a choice between one person with a terrible stance on Gaza, and who supports women's bodily autonomy, would try to rebalance the Supreme Court, and has no criminal convictions, versus another person with a terrible stance on Gaza, and who will also sign a federal abortion ban into law, will nominate a crowd of clown judges up and down the system, led a deadly insurrection on the nation's Capitol, is a sex abuser, a tax cheater, a convicted fraudster, and is described by those who know him as completely unsuited fot authority.

What are you going to do? If Trump wins it will be because people like you let him win.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] GottaKnowYourCHKN@lemmy.world 40 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

She's not president. What is she single-handedly supposed to do? Hilarious that people blame her, not Biden.

Like, we have a felon, racist, con-artist, homophobic, sexist, xenophobic, asshat who is running and has actively embodied wanting to be the next Hitler, disparages fallen soldiers, taken obvious bribes, lied to citizens faces, started an attempt to overthrow our government, put children in cages, taken money from corrupt countries, will actively attempt to bring back concentration camps, ban women from having bodily autonomy, ban schools from talking about slavery or risk losing funding, make it illegal to be gay/trans, and laugh in your damn face about it all.

But no, the Black lady said some mean things and so therefore she's not qualified and so I'll just not do anything so the white guy wins.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

Cyka blyat 🤣

load more comments (17 replies)
[-] basmati@lemmus.org 15 points 3 weeks ago

So libs are really just dropping all lip service to criminal justice reform now.

[-] SelfProgrammed@lemmy.world 37 points 3 weeks ago

Nah, we're just not voting for a fascist for president but I can see how that's confusing when you drop all morals for selfishness.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 14 points 3 weeks ago

Well hello there 1 month old obvious hexbear alt

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Less how sexist ð country as a whole is and more how sexist ð battleground states are.

If it was even just FPTP popular vote, Hariss would be projected for a landslide right now.

[-] felixwhynot@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago

Can you explain why you're just,,, casually using eths in your post

[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 8 points 3 weeks ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

The deck is stacked. But when you talk about leveling the playing field - with DC statehood or repel of felony disenfranchisement or just prosecuting a cunt like Elon when he's caught buying votes in an election - liberals just shrug and insist there's nothing they can do.

Pure controlled opposition. You begin to question whether they even want to win.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

People pretending Kamala is competent is almost as funny as people pretending Trump is Christian.

This is going to be Hilary all over again. Absolutely the same clueless "why won't you vote for me?! I have such good referrals!!" energy.

[-] auzy@lemmy.world 25 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

She's not even president yet, she passed the bar exam, and yet you've figured her out

Have you got your bar licence? Maybe it makes sense to have someone in charge of the US who has comprehensive knowledge of the law.... Just a thought

Whereas you posted 8500 comments in the past year alone averaging 15 comments per day since joining last year.. Which suggests you're possibly not even employed...

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 weeks ago

Also the implication that a subset of Americans are sexist because they won't vote for a woman who has expressed unwavering support in continuing a genocide.

More 👏 female 👏 genocide 👏 perpetrators 👏

[-] hannesh93@feddit.org 24 points 3 weeks ago

Netanjahu is openly cheering for trump, knowing that he will have no more breaks on his plan to completely level Gaza and expand on the settler program.

Trump is the one that basically told the Palestinian people that they'll never have Jerusalem as a capital by moving the embassy there

It's so obvious how much this is just a bad-faith attempt to discourage people from voting for the clearly better choice if you care about Palestine...

[-] BilliamBoberts@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

You do realize that if trump wins, there is a very real possibility he'll nuke Gaza himself? Because I need to know you understand that. Kamala might not be as harsh on bibi as you'd like, but she'll work towards a ceasefire. Trump has threatened to nuke foreign countries before but was stopped by his staff like his former chief of staff, john kelly, and his former secretary of defense mark milley (both of whom have recently come out and described trump as a fascist btw). And that staff won't be around this time to stop him. He's surrounding himself with sycophants who will blindly do his bidding.

load more comments (23 replies)
[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah! How dare you! /s

[-] VantaBrandon@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

At the level orangie is polling, sexist would be generous. A flaming dumpster fire probably more accurate.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
1753 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

5432 readers
1762 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS