317
submitted 1 month ago by RmDebArc_5@toot.io to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

#Firefox doesn't need any new features to be more attractive for users, it just needs to make CSS theming more accessible

Theme: https://github.com/Godiesc/firefox-one

#FirefoxCSS #browserwar #customization @firefox

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Dirk@lemmy.ml 83 points 1 month ago

Also don't add advertising crap that is opt-out and only configurable via about:config.

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 75 points 1 month ago

Uh, no, they definitely need tab grouping before they get into making CSS theming easier.

[-] tuna@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 1 month ago

Looks to be in the works which makes me very happy. If you use nightly, make sure browser.tabs.groups.enabled in about:config is enabled

https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/ideas/native-tab-grouping-more-customizable-tab-bar/idc-p/72706/highlight/true#M39420

[-] PoolloverNathan@programming.dev 6 points 1 month ago

Tab grouping is nice, but I've found Sidebery to meet my needs (specifically nested tab groups, and separating projects — plus it worked out of the box with Firefox Color) much better. I have it configured to automatically unload collapsed branches, which is nice as a tab hoarder, and it can fully send entire panels to your bookmarks for later usage (this is a massive performance improvement when you're regularly opening 100–200 tabs/day per panel). A native solution, however, would be much appreciated — as long as there's a way to nest tab groups and unload their contents.

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You can actually fairly easily unload tabs with about:unloads right now, but you have to do it in the order ~~Facebook~~ Firefox thinks they should be done for some reason.

Honestly, I don't know why, but sidebar tabs have just never worked for me. It makes no sense, but for some reason my brain just doesn't process them correctly.

But I agree, in general more fine-grained control of tabs would be the thing I would need in order to feel like Firefox was feature-complete.

Edit: Facebook? Wtf?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] festnt@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

yes i agree, tab grouping is very good

[-] PrinzKasper@feddit.org 1 points 4 weeks ago

I would very much welcome them adding support for HDR content too

[-] NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world 61 points 1 month ago

And stop doing shady shit

[-] Vincent@feddit.nl 46 points 1 month ago

Anyone who thinks they know what needs to happen for Firefox to regain market share, needs to consider what would happen if someone forks Firefox and makes that happen.

There's no way that CSS theming is it. And in general, "not doing something" isn't going to be it, either.

[-] fixmycode@feddit.cl 2 points 1 month ago

they need to offer a better alternative to Electron. once that happens, you'll have Firefox everywhere. People will code their SPAs to run in Firefox first, recommend it to their users, and accelerate the development of better APIs.

[-] Vincent@feddit.nl 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Ah, so it should just be better! I wonder why nobody thought of that yet :P

(Sorry, I'm in a sarcastic mood, but you get my point.)

[-] fixmycode@feddit.cl 5 points 1 month ago

oh don't get me wrong if I had a plan for it I'd be doing it. I've always found it really weird given the impact that Electron had in app development, why Firefox never tried to ride that train. I know of one short lived effort to take the engine out of the browser.

[-] Vincent@feddit.nl 4 points 1 month ago

Usually the answer is limited resources with unclear payoff, i.e. even with Electron's success, it's not clear that there's room for an alternative in the market, and it'd be a lot of effort to do.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] threeganzi@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Check out Tauri, a better alternative to Electron. It avoids bundling a browser engine in the binary and relies on the OS browser engine.

[-] prototype_g2@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 month ago

Honestly, I don't see why CSS theming is important. The customization is nice and all, but that's not going to make people switch to Firefox. There are many other things that could be improved, like adding tab grouping. I use this extension called Tree Style Tab which I cannot live without. Firefox having something like that by default instead of an extension would be nice.

However, having said that, OperaGX did find quite a lot of success by simply making it easy to theme the browser, so I can see where they are coming from.

[-] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Tree Style Tab which I cannot live without. Firefox having something like that by default instead of an extension would be nice.

Been using TST for a while now, and I whole heartedly agree. Given that it's essentially just some CSS, I can't imagine that it would be difficult at all to support natively.

[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 24 points 1 month ago

Only reason I use Chromium is PWAs (Web Apps). Which is why I made an extension that opens links from Chromium in Firefox.

Got Slack running in your work profile on Chromium? Opens links in Firefox work profile.

I should probably release this.

[-] KLISHDFSDF@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

Same here. I have to trust/use an extension and third party desktop application (Progressive Web Apps for Firefox) to get this feature to work and not have to rely on Chrome/Edge/etc.

I can easily see less patient or understanding users dropping Firefox if they find out it doesn't work with Progressive Web Apps.

[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

My problem with that extension is the separate profile requirement (so new links can't open in a specific profile), and some things (like Slack) don't fully work outside Chromium.

My solution works like this:

  • Slack open as PWA in Chromium in profile Work
  • Click link to http://that
  • Extension captures the request, cancels the new tab/window, sends the URL and profile name to a small service running on localhost
  • Service opens Firefox with same profile to URL

The extension is set to skip this process if the base URL is the same as the current site (Slack.com/google.com/etc).

Note: Why would someone down vote you for a helpful response? Sheash.

[-] tay404@mstdn.social 16 points 1 month ago

@RmDebArc_5 @firefox I believe they really need better tab organization (without the need for extensions). just basic tab grouping like chrome is a very important feature.

[-] Midnitte@beehaw.org 2 points 1 month ago
[-] Quintus@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Agreed. This is the only reason (besides the built-in fake VPN) OperaGX is popular. All browsers have pretty much the same feature set. OperaGX's biggest strength is CSS customization, Firefox's biggest strength is extensions, Edge's is being the Windows default and Chrome's is it's image of "fast and secure browsing".

All Firefox needs to be is a jack of all trades. But still prioritize it's main distinction.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago

Bad for privacy (potentially)

[-] festnt@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

well extensions can be too, you just gotta trust or use open source stuff

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

Well I'm very unlikely to stray from Foss. The problem with theming is that it allows websites to pick you out in a crowd. That won't matter much if you don't clear cookies on close but for people who want to resist fingerprinting that is a deal breaker.

I would love to theme the browser but that also themes websites are far as I can tell.

[-] solrize@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago

Main thing I want is to override site css. Who cares what the browser itself looks like.

[-] unrushed233@lemmings.world 11 points 1 month ago
[-] xnx@slrpnk.net 4 points 4 weeks ago

Zen browser is Firefox with easy css theming

[-] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago

Maybe start rendering pages right?

[-] Luci@lemmy.ca 39 points 1 month ago

Nah, get chromium and web devs to adopt web standards

[-] d0ntpan1c 13 points 1 month ago

Most of the time its the fault of the developer if a page only works in chrome.

[-] festnt@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago

what pages dont render right though?

[-] variants@possumpat.io 1 points 1 month ago

For me it's anything like excalidraw or something like Google sheets. They work fine until I change tabs and come back then it's blank. But if I move the arrow keys or scroll wheel then every comes in and out of existence or stays on the screen even if I select another sheet until I close and reopen the site. But I never noticed this issue before moving to Linux so maybe it's an issue on my machine

[-] d0ntpan1c 5 points 1 month ago

Idk for sure, but if excalidraw uses canvas then there are a lot more possible machine/OS specific problems that come up. Web browser features that hand tasks off to the GPU have gotten a lot better over recent years but there are still oddities like max shaders for a specific browser/OS/GPU combo that'll lead to some funny behavior.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] festnt@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

ive never noticed anything like that, so yeah, its probably something related to your OS

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ProfessorYakkington@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 weeks ago

I like theming , I am already a Firefox user. I think the sad reality is that for more adoptions , in the order of numbers that chrome puts up , Firefox needs to be a default application ; the common users doesn't want to customize anything ( my hot take ).

I don't think it is important that Firefox gets to those numbers as long as they can generate enough revenue to keep going.

[-] Lightsong@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Uhh also, auto captioning features like Google chrome pls.

this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
317 points (100.0% liked)

Firefox

17938 readers
11 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS