427
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 44 points 3 months ago

Is that from Fahrenheit 451 by chance?

[-] Whopraysforthedevil@midwest.social 25 points 3 months ago

I did Google F451 fireman to make this

[-] thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 months ago

I guess why the bottom right one is holding a book?

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 months ago

That's Montag

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

That was my first thought

[-] Steamymoomilk@sh.itjust.works 40 points 3 months ago

This looks like Fahrenheit 451

[-] Maeve@midwest.social 3 points 3 months ago
[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago
[-] desktop_user 3 points 3 months ago

god I hate how few cars are properly firefighter proof

[-] MMNT@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

They did at one point set houses on fire though. I listened to a podcast on the history of firemen in the US. Mad stuff. Can't remember the name of the podcast though.

[-] tetris11@lemmy.ml 17 points 3 months ago

There's a nice scene in Gangs of New York, where rival Fire teams would fight it out whilst robbing the houses they were "saving"

[-] thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 months ago

Firefighting shenanigans go all the way back to ancient Rome: Marcus Licinius Crassus formed Rome's first fire brigade, which would basically extort the owners of burning buildings to buy them on the cheap. Per Wikipedia:

The first ever Roman fire brigade was created by Crassus. Fires were almost a daily occurrence in Rome, and Crassus took advantage of the fact that Rome had no fire department, by creating his own brigade—500 men strong—which rushed to burning buildings at the first cry of alarm. Upon arriving at the scene, however, the firefighters did nothing while Crassus offered to buy the burning building from the distressed property owner, at a miserable price. If the owner agreed to sell the property, his men would put out the fire; if the owner refused, then they would simply let the structure burn to the ground. After buying many properties this way, he rebuilt them, and often leased the properties to their original owners or new tenants.

[-] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 months ago

When you get paid to stop something bad that is happening, prevention is not in your best interest.

I know in like ancient Rome they'd haggle for payment while the house was burning.

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Like I know firefighter put out fires, but in the US at least departments are often instrumental in making sure city streets are as unsafe as possible so they can drive their enormous trucks down them.

They will even do shit like narc out renters who have too many roommates in single family neighborhoods to city authorities, like they're not cops but some of them try really hard.

Like an order of magnitude more people die in car crashes than house fires, and more often than not fire departments are just responding to some dumbass crashing their car.

[-] DrBob@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

That's the Fire Marshall. They are the enforcement arm of fire services. Do you think there is a reason so few people die in fires and maybe its tied to a strong regulatory regime? Like make sure occupancy limits are respected and fire exits aren't blocked?

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

Making sure city streets are wide as a highway lane is integral to fire safety, maybe if they narrowed streets they would be responding to fewer grisly car crashes

[-] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 months ago

Are you high AF? You start off sane enough, but rapidly scatter into wtf territory in multiple irrational directions at once.

Maybe come back to this thought after a rest. 🤓

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] mlg@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago
[-] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 months ago

TBF, occasionally sending in a murderous idiot armed with a gun is actually the correct solution to a problem.

[-] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

When?
When guerrilla warfare attacking another sovereign nation (so not on home soil)?

No, I don't think there is a problem I want solved that way (the "murderous" part I mean).

[-] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 months ago

For every problem, there is a sufficiently improbable scenario where it's a benefit.

[-] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yes, sufficiently improbable!

But the og reply I'm replying to said "correct" (not best, or appropriate, or practical), that's why I don't want a raging natural murderer doing any murdering (not even as executioner).

That's why you don't usually have hero movies where heroes heroically kill people & enjoy it - but rather heroes that oppose killing (but still kill a buch of evil™ people).

[-] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago

What definition of "correct" are you using that makes it significantly different from those others words?

[-] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

Well, since it's not exact science we are talking about the "correct" can only mean something totally subjective.

So I might not think ever the correct solution to use a murdering idiot with a gun.
Not least because that implies having (and keeping) murdering idiots.
That's one example why I would label that as an incorrect solution.

[-] lyricanna@ttrpg.network 2 points 3 months ago

Terrorists and school shooters. Frankly, if cops were as gun happy towards Nazis as they are everyone else, we wouldn't have quite the fascist problem.

Now, I'm not saying an idiot with a gun is the best solution to those issues, but it would be a solution.

[-] DaMonsterKnees@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

It was a pleasure to burn.

[-] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 6 points 3 months ago

There is a grain of truth buried in there

[-] rsuri@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

I mean forest fire fighters do this sometimes.

this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
427 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

6035 readers
3334 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS