134
submitted 3 days ago by TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml to c/movies@lemm.ee
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

I haven’t seen it but was looking forward to it until I heard it’s a musical. Just why

[-] flicker@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago

You can make more money with a flop than with a hit!

[-] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

I get this reference

[-] RidderSport@feddit.org 9 points 2 days ago

I did watch it, although I had been warned. I figured the calls of it being a musical had to be inflated - they weren't. If you cut the singing, you'll have about half the runtime.

That in and of itself isn't even bad, albeit not my cup of tea. However what really annoyed me, was that NOTHING happened. It was basically a slice of psychic ward life story. One with an explosive but blue-balled ending. It was basically just the script writers trying to make Lady Gaga sing a lot - well a job well done I suppose.

It actually annoys me a lot, because the cast was great and delivered exceptionally well in their acting. The premise and setting also had a lot of potential, but what we got was more of an art-house low-budget movie with great actors but terrible script

[-] smeenz@lemmy.nz 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

A psychic ward? Now that would make for an interesting story. Joker can now see into the future.

[-] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 22 points 3 days ago

Imagine making 20 millions as a director to lose 200

[-] imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works 28 points 3 days ago

Meh the director already got paid. Producers are taking the monetary hit on this one. Probably won't be a good sign for the director's career moving forward though.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 9 points 3 days ago

I'm sure he'll survive, somehow.

[-] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 7 points 3 days ago

Yes, the director definitely got his salary, but the money is still going to be lost by the studio

[-] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

I mean he also made the first one that made a billion.

[-] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago
[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

Fuck it, I’d do it for $2 mil.

[-] Orbituary@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago

I liked the movie a lot.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago

Yeah it would have worked if they waited another 5 years before trying to beat the horse for nostalgia value. They were impatient.

People saw the first film as a novel concept with a new exciting take on a classic character. People are going to see the sequel as something... not fresh.

[-] keyez@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

In an interview Todd Philips said he and Joaquin had no plans for a second movie until Joaquin had a dream about doing a second movie

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Maybe dreams should actually remain memes.

[-] JizzmasterD@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 days ago

It was actually not bad. It stumbled on the ending but did a lot of things well for the DC universe’s « La La Land. »

[-] doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 3 days ago

Didn't even know this movie had been announced until I'd heard it was bombing. I never watched the first one so odds were pretty slim I'd have seen it anyway.

[-] HeartyOfGlass@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago

That's okay. In a year or two they'll call it a "cult classic" and make another anyway.

[-] AlexisFR@jlai.lu 4 points 2 days ago

No, they won't. It'll never be a cult classic.

[-] rothaine@beehaw.org 5 points 3 days ago

roughly $100 million to market and distribute.

And yet this is the first time I'm hearing that it's out

[-] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 days ago

It's because you use uBlock Origin and don't subscribe to cable.

Plus, you're on the Fediverse, where there are even less opportunities for advertising than centralized social media.

[-] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 days ago

It's still regularly discussed on this community

[-] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago

True. Maybe @rothaine@beehaw.org isn't a regular member of this community.

[-] GammaGames@beehaw.org 5 points 3 days ago

I just don’t understand. The first was a novelty that did surprisingly well, I had no expectation that this would be anywhere as successful. Who’s making these estimates?

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 3 days ago

I don't think a Joker movie is really much of a novelty? Just a superhero film that looks at an origin story for the most popular comic villain of all time.

[-] GammaGames@beehaw.org 4 points 3 days ago

Compared to most movies… it was weird. I enjoyed my time with it but didn’t care what happened after the credits rolled. I don’t know anyone that was looking forward to this, most didn’t even know about it.

At least the first one had the stairs meme!

[-] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 2 points 2 days ago

I loved the first one. The second one I immediately did not care about the moment I heard that it was a musical. At first I thought they were joking.

[-] GammaGames@beehaw.org 2 points 2 days ago

Don’t get me wrong, the first was a good movie! It was also what I expected going in: a slow character piece about some guy turning into a crazy Batman villain.

I didn’t know the sequel was a musical, what an odd decision!

this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
134 points (100.0% liked)

movies

1650 readers
379 users here now

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS