684
all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 141 points 3 weeks ago

This is a false equivalence from the beginning. The far right has been more dangerous than the far left in America for at least a century.

[-] tortina_original@lemmy.world 28 points 3 weeks ago

"Far left"

Jesus christ, this is quite insane.

[-] Entertainmeonly 30 points 3 weeks ago

Ya, the far left. You know, the lunatics that want to tax you and give your taxes to schools. For extremist purposes like new books and free school lunches. The far left. The terrorists that want to put the good American insurance companies out on the streets, and take taxes away from the woefully under funded military industrial complex, so that the person without a job, because they are too lazy to grow their legs back, can get free housing and medical attention. They are just so extreme. Nothing like the good god fearing right that only want to protect the children. From eating, reading, and generally being able to form a coherent opinion. That's what the Bible is there for. Or the Qur'an. Depending on your flavor text.

[-] tortina_original@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, I am old enough (and from Europe) to remember walhat "far left" looked like and what they did.

So yeah, it is insane having to read anyone mentioning "far left" in the context of today, especially in the context of USA.

I mean, those nasty far left commie terrorists, wanting medical care and to be left alone.

Tsk, tsk, tsk...

[-] MouseKeyboard@ttrpg.network 12 points 3 weeks ago

Insert that FBI stat that 3/4 of terrorist attacks in the US are far right, 1/4 Islamist and 2% far left.

[-] ghurab@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

Well, Islam is a right wing ideology. So I'm guessing 3/4 of attacks are by white nationalist and Christian fundamentalists, makes the rights share close 98% if these numbers are correct

[-] grue@lemmy.world 64 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

No, that's fallacious in two ways: equivocation and appeal to emotion. Neutrality is not defined by upsetting both sides equally, because that means one side could shift the definition of neutral in their favor by being (or pretending to be) more upset.

Actual neutrality requires objectivity and calling out crocodile tears based on exaggerations (or even wholly imaginary issues, for that matter) as what they are.

[-] Geobloke@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago

Neutrality is not truth

[-] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

I beleive the first would be an appeal to moderation fallacy. I mean, you're right in calling out the illogical BS. I'm just saying I think it's this particular flavour of illogical BS.

I'm sure you can see your way out of one just fine but favourite way to call out an appeal to moderation fallacy is to ask "if I said the sky was predominantly yellow and you, rightly, corrected me and said it was predominantly blue, would it be logical for a third person to conclude that the sky was green?"

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 37 points 3 weeks ago

When since he bought it have they (justifiably) upset the right? I admittedly wouldn't necessarily know but I just haven't seen that

[-] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago

He eventually got rid of a few openly nazi folks under threat of shuttering his platform.

Took a long time and a lot of threats though…..

[-] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

Before he took over it would upset the far right. Now it almost exclusively upsets the left. See? It's even now! /s

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

He probably thinks of the right as to the right of his worldviews and the same with the left.

[-] JoYo@lemmy.ml 36 points 3 weeks ago

so Twitter doesn't deserve public trust. seems obvious to me.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 29 points 3 weeks ago

So do something that upsets the far right, then.

[-] daikiki@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Plenty of things to choose from. You could, for example,

-Exist while not being a bright shade of pink or orange

-Know basic math

-Love your neighbor

-Not live in fear of strawmen

-Demonstrate the most basic of critical thinking skills

-Dislike dictators

-Not care about what other people do in their bedroom

-Support access to medical care

-Want rich people to pay their dues

-Not be a complete tool

Any one of those things would be enough, but for maximum effect, I suggest doing all of them.

[-] skvlp@lemm.ee 28 points 3 weeks ago

Make him go bankrupt and fade into obscurity.

[-] DigitalNirvana@lemm.ee 7 points 3 weeks ago
[-] skvlp@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago

The mother of all necessities

[-] pack@sh.itjust.works 23 points 3 weeks ago

Except it's not, he thinks he's consistent. Far left and far right are a matter of perspective, and from where he sits, far left is trying to not deadname someone, starting a union, or progressive taxation. His far right is somewhere past suggesting gas chambers for social deviants.

[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago

Musk has gone over to the dark orange lying side.

[-] Jagothaciv@kbin.earth 15 points 3 weeks ago

This dude sounds like he needs a boot to the mouth. I swear every time he tries to sound smart he comes off as incredibly dumb, just like his ugly weirdo mother and father.

[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 15 points 3 weeks ago

Musk is a lot like Ben Shapiro in the sense that they are both a stupid person's idea of a smart person.

[-] karashta@lemm.ee 6 points 3 weeks ago

Everything he says like this is basically the same kind of shit I thought was deep at 12

[-] lobut@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 weeks ago

This is a beautiful representation of enlightened centrism.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

And a perfect example of how it's almost invariably disingenuous right-wingers performing it.

[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

The far-right appropriated centrism, by exploiting the fact that many thinks that the historical nazis were just cartoon villains that just did stuff for the sake of evil, and didn't had some sort of justifications to their heinious actions, thus by having justifications they can avoid the "literal evil" allegations.

[-] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 weeks ago

Anything that involves people at scale, will contain politics. Whether that's interpersonal politics or government politics. People will eventually become polarized based on their political views.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

I'm gonna dissect a definition so I can agree with you: from dictionary.com: Politics: the activities associated with ~~the governance of a country or other area, especially~~ the debate or conflict among individuals ~~or parties having or hoping to achieve power.~~

Seems pretty clearcut to me

[-] LordWiggle@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Then why only censor leftist posts on your platform Elon?

[-] maxenmajs@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

No, they just equate "neutrality" with their way being the status quo. It is a very intentional choice to shift the Overton window by insisting that this is neutrality.

[-] Marleyinoc@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

So he's in charge of xitter and a troll. Oh wait, we knew that too.

[-] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, so equal to them is "well, if I'm not allowed to say that all trans people should be murdered, you're not allowed to say they shouldn't all be murdered!"

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 weeks ago

And yet X is now a Nazi bar. All the communists and anarchists are on Mastadon and Lemmy, X is a hellhole now.

[-] WrenMala8@pawb.social 4 points 3 weeks ago

waves hello in socialist on Lemmy

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago

My mission as a Communist is to get everyone to read theory, lol

this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2024
684 points (100.0% liked)

Enough Musk Spam

2182 readers
266 users here now

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS