832

Just started getting this now. Hopefully it's some A/B testing that they'll stop doing, but I'm not holding my breath

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] perishthethought@lemm.ee 264 points 1 month ago

I hate how these kinds of messages never explain WHY. It's just "Do it. Do what we tell you." 💀

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 116 points 1 month ago

BOW TO YOUR MASTERS, AND SUCK OUR DICK!!!!

I remember 10 years ago looking at a calculator app in the android app store, and seeing the permissions. And thinking "WHY THE FUCK DOES A CALCULATOR NEED MY LOCATION, AND ACCESS TO MY PHONE CONTACTS???"

Fuck THAT.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

What dick? pretty sure it's fallen off from all the STD's.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Kyouki@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago

For ads, tracking and spying of course.

[-] tomi000@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

Probably because 99.999% of users already use JS and dedicating a web page to it is already more work than they needed to put into it

I think it's just to avoid explaining why, and how they harvest your data. That said, I also hate how a lot of errors of the big corpo are just like "This site has an error" no error-code, no further feedback what to do etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Zier@fedia.io 160 points 1 month ago

Google is no longer a Search Engine. It is a commerce/purchase search. It's nothing more than ads and corporate results to purchase goods & services. Google Shopping has taken over Google.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] csm10495@sh.itjust.works 78 points 1 month ago

I know this may come off as a surprise: but I imagine that requiring JS in 2024 isn't a big deal to most people.

Now of course Lemmy skews more into that small crowd.

I don't blame any website for requiring JS for full functionality in 2024.

[-] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 65 points 1 month ago

Google is a text input and a list of links. It should work without JS.

[-] filcuk@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 month ago

It's far more than that. Even on a basic search page. Ever expanded the 'Peaplo also ask' section, for example? It loads more results based on your scroll position or interaction.
There's loads of little things like this, you may just not notice or care about it - which is another discussion.

[-] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 27 points 1 month ago

This is an optional feature. The core search functionality does not require JS.

[-] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

*Was an optional feature...

[-] filcuk@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 month ago

That's not up to you, or any of us.
Not maintaining non-js version makes sense for the business, considering how few people are affected.

All we can do is move away to something better.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee 40 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

All of the people replying to this saying you shouldn't need JS are totally unaware how modern web development works.

Yes, you could do many sites without JS, but the entire workforce for web development is trained with JS frameworks. To do otherwise would slow development time down significantly, not allow for certain functionality to exist (functionality you would 100% be unhappy was missing).

Its not a question of possibility, its a question of feasibility.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Flipper@feddit.org 28 points 1 month ago

For full functionality sure. For basic functionality no. Searching on Google is basic functionality I'd say.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] superkret@feddit.org 74 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

DuckDuckGo doesn't ;)

By the way, in my browser, the title of this post shows up as

Google now requires Javascript in c/mildlyinfuriating

which shocked me a little.

[-] abbadon420@lemm.ee 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Sundar Pichai is the admin for this community, didn't you know?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 52 points 1 month ago

Who still uses Google? DDG has been way better for a long while now. Join the duck side.

[-] FundMECFSResearch 25 points 1 month ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] WolvenSpectre@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 month ago
[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago

So that's why it's so good at finding porn.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 51 points 1 month ago

Yep. I use Noscript and DDG Lite by default. Just putting into duckduckgo: !g will search google without having to turn JS on...looks like Duckduckgo wins again, even when it comes to using google, lol.

[-] zer0bitz@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago

Just use SearXNG.

[-] NutWrench@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

I like the SearX search engine. It gives old-school, relevant search results, not google ranked ones.

https://search.inetol.net/

It's also spread out over many separate instances, so you can pick the one that best suits your search needs:

https://searx.space/

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 month ago

Who uses the internet without JavaScript? Must have so many broken websites

[-] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 48 points 1 month ago

I run NoScript, which blocks all JavaScript. I manually allow websites as I need it. It blocks all kinds of annoying nonsense while I browse.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] trevor 19 points 1 month ago

I started disabling JavaScript by default with uBlock Origin a few months ago. I am surprised to report that a bunch of sites work fine without JavaScript.

There are definitely some sites that actually need it, and for those, it's just one click to permanently allow for that site. But most of the sites I need work better with just CSS and HTML because there are no stupid nags or social media sign-in buttons that pop-up anymore.

[-] Faresh@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I installed NoScript just a few days ago, because I'm forced to use a really weak computer that struggles to even browse the modern web. I feel like NoScript improved it a lot, and while quite a few websites broke (including lemmy) (but most will still display the content), I just set the ones that I need working to trusted, but the performance is still good (I should note I'm also using it in conjunction with an automatic tab discarter).

I however also don't directly use Google. Both SearX and Yandex don't need javascript, so I'm unaffected by these news, despite being a bit mad about it as a reflection of the direction the web is going as a whole.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] unrushed233@lemmings.world 20 points 1 month ago

Use LibreX or a fork called LibreY, it's a JS-free proxy for Google search

There's a list of instances at https://librey.org/instances.php

Something similar exists for DuckDuckGo btw, it's called 4get

Or you can just use SearXNG, a meta search engine that aggregates results from multiple sources

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] daggermoon@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

No offense intended, but why are you still using Google? Startpage has anonyomized results from Google. DuckDuckGo is good enough for most people as well. Brave search also exists if you don't mind supporting that shitty company.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 month ago

There are so many alternatives

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

why are you using google in 2024 grandpa

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ScreaminOctopus@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 month ago

I've been happy with Qwant lately, they have their own index so using them doesn't support the Google + Bing hegemony. They're also EU based and regulated by the gdpr.

[-] WolvenSpectre@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 month ago

AFAIK Startpage gives you google results with your privacy intact and less ads.

[-] yamanii@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Didn't they get bought by an ad company?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] adarza@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 month ago

lol. nope. not happening. that's not how to get me to even think about using your search again (having quit over a decade ago).

[-] Mwa@lemm.ee 13 points 1 month ago

they def wanna maximize data collection with javascript

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JTskulk@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

I just disabled Javascript and Google still works fine. It might be only Google's mobile site that requires it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] corvuscache@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

These are also just fun:

I also use Mojeek when I want a (serious) different set of results that I'm not getting from those pulling from google, bing, etc. It's not the best but it's getting better over time.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
832 points (100.0% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35600 readers
330 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS