683
submitted 6 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Georgia’s Republican governor praised Democratic President Joe Biden for reaching out to him in the wake of Hurricane Helene’s deadly devastation as the state and surrounding areas scramble to recover from the disaster.

Former President Donald Trump told a different story when he landed there to survey the damage.

“The governor’s doing a very good job. He’s having a hard time getting the president on the phone,” Trump told reporters. “The federal government is not being responsive.”

It wasn’t true.

Here’s what Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp had to say about Biden and the feds:

The president just called me yesterday afternoon. I missed him and called him right back and he just said, ‘Hey, what do you need?’ And I told him, ‘We got what we need. We’ll work through the federal process. He offered that if there’s other things we need just to call him directly, which I appreciate that,” Kemp said.

“We’ve had FEMA embedded with us since a day or two before the storm hit in our state operating center in Atlanta. We’ve got a great relationship with them,” he said.


🗳️ Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 271 points 6 months ago

and yet, Georgia republicans are going to vote for the asshole that wants to eliminate FEMA and NOAA.

fuckers.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 83 points 6 months ago

Not eliminate, just privatize and make money off of it by stiffing every person, company, and publicly owned... Oh wait yeah, just hurting everyone.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 49 points 6 months ago

If the agencies were privatized, they would cease to exist. That is. Eliminated.

You don’t get privatized health care from the government, either.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Doubt they would eliminate the names, that would hurt the "creditibility" beholden by the names they would want to use for their gain. I think it would go more like Amtrak, or the Prison systems. Destroying the pieces they don't want, and making profits off the parts they can. Slowly pushing their agendas hiding behind the name of something they can use a disguise while most of the country never recognizes it changed. The parts they can't profit off of they would leave as a burden to the people, and the profitable and influencial parts they will strip and grab.

[-] Sconrad122@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Okay, but they literally said they would eliminate them in Project 2025. It's being awful generous to claim they only want to do the lite version of eliminate. Boil the frog is over, MAGA is masks off crazy. They probably won't be able to do it, because odds are good that the House at least will be blue in 2025 thanks to some of the more egregious gerrymanders getting fixed, but that doesn't mean they don't openly want to do it. These people are not smooth operators stealing brand awareness, they are chimpanzees flinging shit at the wall

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Where in Project 2025 do they say that? Because it says to break it up and commercialize it everywhere I have seen. So I am saying why that it bad, not just making up that they said to eliminate it where I haven't seen.

[-] Sconrad122@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Dang, you're right, I was wrong. It calls for NWS to be commercialized, which could technically be interpreted as either sell off the assets to weather.com or as lay off all the employees and pay weather.com 10x their salary in contracts to get the same product. It calls for NOAA to be downsized alongside NWS' commercialization. It calls for FEMA to pay much less out to states and eliminate its preparedness grants and insurance programs. All that in mind, it kind of seems tailor made to specifically fuck over Florida and other hurricane/flooding prone states, but it doesn't call for eliminating the agencies. My bad, thanks for the correction!

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

You sir, are a good person. I will forever be in your gratitude for following up in research. I always try to follow truth within my arguments. You today helped me know I didn't lie. Thank you

[-] frunch@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago

Oh wait yeah, just hurting everyone.

You're forgetting the handful of people that will profit wildly from this, so technically not everyone...just most (99.9% +/-)

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

It doesn’t hurt any people, in their eyes we’re just living human capital.

[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Outrageous. Republicans would never withhold important info about a disaster just to make a quick buck!

[-] solarvector@lemmy.zip 86 points 6 months ago

Doesn't look like it's driving him crazy. He just lies about it, half of his supporters believe him, and the other half believe "in spirit". Seems pretty normal.

[-] frunch@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago

That seems like a good way to describe that level of devotion--believing him "in spirit".

While some are doing keg-stands with the Kool-Aid, others such as these believers 'in spirit' are just casually sipping a Kool-Aid cocktail to be social and/or fit in (or perhaps have succumbed to peer pressure, etc)

[-] jj4211@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Scott Adams calls these sorts of lies "directionally true"

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago

Meh, he's a piece of shit these days himself.

[-] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Well, yes, that was sort of the point. He's so die hard MAGA that even when faced with a hateful and demonstrably false statement, he still calls it "directionally" true, which is even worse than any of the corporate misspeak he ever made fun of in his days of popularity.

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

Ah I apologize, I read your comment as citing him for his witty euphemism, not as calling him out for his maga-ness.

[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 76 points 6 months ago

On X the MAGA people are constantly saying how Biden did nothing, but the fact is two days before he acted to help the people that were effected.

[-] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 43 points 6 months ago

the fact is

Well there's your problem...

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 13 points 6 months ago

They'll never hear about it.

I guarantee the media they are listening to showed them this:

“The governor’s doing a very good job. He’s having a hard time getting the president on the phone,” Trump told reporters. “The federal government is not being responsive.”

But never showed them this:

“The president just called me yesterday afternoon. I missed him and called him right back and he just said, ‘Hey, what do you need?’ And I told him, ‘We got what we need. We’ll work through the federal process. He offered that if there’s other things we need just to call him directly, which I appreciate that,” Kemp said.

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 62 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Remember when trump threatened to withhold aid to Californians impacted by a disaster because their governor didn’t kiss the ring with enough gusto?

As we have to deal with progressively worse disasters due to climate change, some morons want to vote for the guy that will refuse to help their own communities if his arse isn’t kissed enough.

If you live in an area that will be hit with such disasters and are still considering voting for this lunatic, you deserve what’s coming to you. But consider that your sane neighbours won’t deserve the consequences of your actions, and will be entirely justified to refuse to help you when your orange god hangs you out to dry.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 48 points 6 months ago

Did he launch paper towels to the needy this time?

[-] funkyfarmington@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago

Would you look at that, a actually functioning government!

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

WHY ISN'T BIDEN DOWN THERE THROWING PAPER TOWEL ROLLS AT THE GEORGIANS!?! /s

[-] stringere@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago

Because we had a hurricaine here in AMERICA. Why would Biden waste time in Eastern Europe?

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I've been through quite a number of natural disasters in my life. Flash floods, tornados, and more hurricanes than I can count. I think you can depend on a range of emotions if you're the victim of such events.

First, disbelief. Mother nature is all powerful and just awesome. Go outside after the storm and you'll see some shocking things sometimes. Things you just can't believe can happen. Second, hopelessness. You wonder what will happen now that you've lost everything. It's very depressing. Hard to understand why you're a victim and this leads to anger at times. Lastly, there's the "carry on" when you just go forward because what choice is there?

I say this as a lens into the on the ground reporting that's done. Sure, when they put a microphone in front of a victim you should take it with a grain of salt, but really theses emotions are underlying.

Also have worked a number of recoveries. That is long and tiring work, but actually you get payback constantly by knowing you're helping people.

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 8 points 6 months ago

Republicans are KNOWN to do Their Own Research so they'll OBVIOUSLY find out they're being Lied to! OBVIOUSLY!

[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Good, let the Orange Shit Stain cry more.

this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
683 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22983 readers
3566 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS