260

The blocked resources in question? Automatic security and features updates and plugin/theme repository access. Matt Mullenweg reasserted his claim that this was a trademark issue. In tandem, WordPress.org updated its Trademark Policy page to forbid WP Engine specifically (way after the Cease & Desist): from "you are free to use ['WP'] n any way you see fit" to a diatribe:

The abbreviation “WP” is not covered by the WordPress trademarks, but please don’t use it in a way that confuses people. For example, many people think WP Engine is “WordPress Engine” and officially associated with WordPress, which it’s not. They have never once even donated to the WordPress Foundation, despite making billions of revenue on top of WordPress.

https://techcrunch.com/2024/09/26/wordpress-vs-wp-engine-drama-explained attempts to provide a full chronology so far.

Edit:

The WordPress Foundation, which owns the trademark, has also filed to trademark “Managed WordPress” and “Hosted WordPress.” Developers and providers are worried that if these trademarks are granted, they could be used against them.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 80 points 10 months ago

Would it be wrong to hope they manage to commit some gross act of mutual destruction, and that the outcome would be that I never have to deal with Wordpress ever again?

[-] Pechente@feddit.org 28 points 10 months ago

That would be great but the reality is that client’s mindsets need to change. I tried to explain to a client that Wordpress is not a good fit for their complex web application and yet they didn’t wanna switch to anything else. People are way too worried about new tech and wanna stick with whatever they know, even if it causes massive problems.

[-] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 33 points 10 months ago

Wordpress is not a good fit for their complex web application

Seriously. People want to shove everything into Wordpress then get cranky when you can't make Wordpress into a ecommerce store, marketing platform, personal blog, file sharing service, and NFT marketplace.

And then it gets hacked because they needed 14 SEO plugins, 2 different form plugins, and were not going to pay for managed updates because that's easy they can do it themselves.

[-] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

If you're trying to turn WordPress into an application, for christs sake go use Django, Laravel, or Rails. Don't send a CMS to do an applications' job.

Shit you don't even need a CMS at this point. I moved off WordPress to Hugo and SFTP and i'm happier than a pig in shit. Shit loads fast and no external threats.

[-] SouthFresh@lemmy.ml 30 points 10 months ago

Wordpress is the Excel of CMSs. It can do just about anything, but at this point it barely manages content well.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 10 points 10 months ago

That's a great analogy actually. You can do almost anything with it but what the vast majority of people choose to do with it is wrong.

Just like how people insist on using Excel as a database or Excel as a form.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Wordpress is not a good fit for virtually any modern application. It's designed as a blogging platform and basically no one makes blogs anymore. That functionality kind of got eaten up by Facebook and Twitter and LinkedIn, so no one needs blogs.

Instead of letting WordPress die the death it most definitely deserves they shoehorned in functionality, which would be fine if it wasn't such a bodge job.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jqubed@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

I have off-and-on searched for alternative software for personal blogs that can be self-hosted and it doesn’t seem like there are many options anymore. The only ones I’ve seen are WriteFreely and FlatPress. Are there any other options you’re aware of?

[-] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 5 points 10 months ago

Depends on if you need a CMS, or if you can use a static site generator.

For a CMS, I'm still a fan of Ghost and it has (mostly) not enshittified to the point it's unpleasant to use.

If you don't need the whole CMS thing, there's an awful lot of options. (And hosting them is super simplified since you can just stuff the output into a S3 bucket/Cloudflare Pages/Github Pages/a dozen other providers for basically free.)

[-] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 5 points 10 months ago

There's Contao, Drupal, Blogger, Shopify, Wix, Squarespace...

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago

Had to use Squarespace for work. Did not enjoy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 10 months ago

Shopify seems like it was purposely designed to be as dreadful as possible. They seemed to go out of their way to make dumb decisions.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 5 points 10 months ago

Any suggestions for a free easy to use alternative to wp?

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

I have one that you may not like, but fits your description.

I don't know what wordpress is, so I would suggest just not bothering at all with whatever that is. Maybe use wordpad.

[-] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 9 points 10 months ago

that's a local text editor. CMSes are for e.g. hosting blogs

[-] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 5 points 10 months ago

I am sure I can make an amazing website with wordpad. Thanks!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 10 months ago

Personally I recommend Ms paint

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 42 points 10 months ago

Yeah, open source licenses don't entitle you to use trademarks.

This looks pretty bad to me.

[-] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 21 points 10 months ago

WP Engine for WordPress.
That seems to be the commonly accepted solution if you look at other 3rd party trademark cases - situations like "RIF is fun for Reddit" coming to mind.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 18 points 10 months ago

Like JohnEdwa said, using a trademark to refer to someone else's product is considered nominative fair use: "referencing a mark to identify the actual goods and services that the trademark holder identifies with the mark."

[-] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 22 points 10 months ago

They're very obviously using the trademark in a manner that implies endorsement.

That is absolutely trademark infringement.

[-] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 7 points 10 months ago

At most, they just ambiguously used "Powered by WordPress Experts" once. I don't see how the evidence misleads people into thinking there was an endorsement.

IMO, dumb people confuse stuff all the time, like the Minecraft Gamepedia with the Minecraft Wikia back then. The meager amount of evidence presented does not convince me that WP Engine has done any actual harm to the WordPress brand.

But yeah, the smart way out would've been adding a "WP Engine is not associated with WordPress.org", at least one below the "WP ENGINE®, VELOCITIZE®, TORQUE®, EVERCACHE®, and the cog logo service marks are owned by WPEngine, Inc." footer. All in the past now, though. At the best both companies are tomfools.

[-] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 12 points 10 months ago

They explicitly call their engine Wordpress more than once in those examples. You cannot do that.

[-] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 10 months ago

Yes they can. It’s actually WordPress, so it’s nominative.

[-] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 months ago

No, they can't, because no, it isn't. That's what trademarks are for. You can't use a trademarked name to refer to your competing product.

Open source projects are generally permissive in terms of people repackaging their code for distribution for different platforms within reasonable guidelines, but even that is a sufficient change that they aren't obligated to allow their trademarks to be used that way.

It is no longer Wordpress once it's modified. That's what trademark is for.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] TwitchingCheese@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

Wow Matt really looking bad on this one. This just reeks of trying to push out a major business competitor to wordpress.com and abusing control over wordpress.org to do it.

[-] NostraDavid@programming.dev 14 points 10 months ago

ThePrimeagen invited Matt to explain what's going on.

TL;DW Matt's claim is that he tried to get WP Engine to pay for a Trademark license (or whatever it's called - I'm recalling from watching yesterday), over several months, and they tried to legally block him in every way. Their self-claimed contributions to Wordpress were (as he tells it) that they held conferences where they promoted their own stuff only - code contributions have been minimal.

So the combination of not willing to pay for the trademark + not contributing back (not in code, not in helping the community) is Matt's reasoning for blocking them from using Wordpress' resources.

He also mentioned that he has good relations with other Wordpress hosts, so it's not like he's trying to block anyone else from hosting, but they were all willing to pay for the use of the Trademark (and/or contribute back).

[-] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 5 points 10 months ago

This is accurate, but also, "minimal" here is 40 hours of code contributions per week compared to Automattic's near-4000. Additionally, WP Engine is the biggest Wordpress.com competitor.

[-] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 7 points 10 months ago

The open-source side of WordPress is pretty pissed off at Matt right now. The Slack is heavily downvoting/disliking all of this.

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 15 points 10 months ago

Wordpress is a security hole anyway, use something else if you have to use plugins for your usecase.

[-] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 5 points 10 months ago

Just not Drupal. Its still pretty bad.

[-] ravhall@discuss.online 12 points 10 months ago

Wordpress is junk.

[-] subignition@fedia.io 11 points 10 months ago

Fuck WordPress, but also it kinda sounds like WordPress is more in the right here.

[-] interurbain1er@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago

Nah. WordPress is GPL, they can't bitch about someone else reselling it. That would be like Linus Thorvalds blocking a company that sells linux distro because he doesn't like them.

And also wordpress is a piece of trash.

[-] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 11 points 10 months ago

GPL doesn't give you any rights to trademarks.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] xnx@slrpnk.net 7 points 10 months ago

Hopefully this spurs Automaticc to put more attention into the fediverse. With Tumblr moving to use Wordpress code that could bring all tumblr blogs to the fediverse and get more programmers and resources interested

[-] cupcakezealot 4 points 10 months ago

greymatter blog superiority

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2024
260 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

73655 readers
4888 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS