603

Also good for composting and making room in your recycling bin

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] grue@lemmy.world 110 points 5 months ago
[-] Kickass3DPrints@lemmy.world 73 points 5 months ago
[-] DaGeek247@fedia.io 9 points 5 months ago

This would work with regular shaped blades, right? Like this? https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01GIZ9164/

[-] Kickass3DPrints@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Yes any standard sized utility knife blades should fit. I tested a bunch of different brands from my local hardware store.

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 5 months ago

FYI those are stupid expensive. Your can get 50-75 for that price at your local hardware store.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 51 points 5 months ago
[-] kellenoffdagrid@lemmy.sdf.org 40 points 5 months ago

Looks like the specific design in this video is being sold here, but if you'd prefer something that isn't behind a pay wall there's a few options (like this one).

Side rant: I'm all for people getting compensation for creative work but I feel like it's wrong to put the source file behind a waywall instead of simply selling the actual print directly to people that don't have access to a printer, that seems much more fair imo

[-] CluckN@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago

Selling the actual print is more work than selling the STL.

[-] kellenoffdagrid@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 5 months ago

Oh definitely, I just think it's easier to justify paying for a physical product than it is paying for a single file if you still need to manufacture it yourself. Still a valid business practice, I'm just biased toward "information should be free" and all that.

[-] Captainvaqina@sh.itjust.works 20 points 5 months ago

It's $3 which is well worth the time saved by not having to design it from scratch.

Someone had to use their skills to create it, do you think they should work for free?

[-] kellenoffdagrid@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 5 months ago

I don't disagree, never said people should work for free. I recognize there's a disjoint in believing good information should be free[ly accessible] and also that people deserve compensation for work, though. It's just one of those contradictions I haven't solved as far as my own beliefs.

More than anything I was complaining, like I said it's a totally valid business choice, I'm just a penny-pincher lol.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] scrion@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

But it's not just information, someone sat in front of their computer and put the work in to design it, then print it and iterate.

You're paying for that process, and for the time and effort the person took to acquire the necessary skills.

However, there should be a noticeable price difference due to the easy scaling / replicatibility when distributing digital goods.

I'm with you insofar as the final product feels like it should be 3 bucks, not the file.

[-] kellenoffdagrid@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 months ago

I replied to another response similar to yours so I won't bore you unless you want to read more, but I mostly agree with what you said and I totally agree that the work itself to create the file is worth compensation. I'm just a penny-pinching bastard who would rather find out if the print is actually good before paying lmao.

Pay-what-you-want, donations, and subsidizing with a higher price for the final product makes more sense to me in terms of these kinds of digital goods, but that's besides the point, and I'm no expert on this kind of thing.

Honestly I'd be willing to pay 5-8 bucks for the final product since it looks more polished than any of the free designs I've seen. But yes, fair points.

I mean, buying things like clothes patterns and carpentry plans is definitely a thing. An stl is really no different.

[-] kellenoffdagrid@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 months ago

That's a fair point, I guess I think of digital goods in a different context.

They definitely deserve compensation for their work, and how they chose to do it is absolutely valid. I think I'm biased toward open source hardware where the labor of creating their digital files is subsidized by selling the physical product instead. I realize that's a risk and takes more effort though, so I totally understand why they didn't do that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] fishos@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I tried to buy the model from an artist recently for personal use(friend wanted some Mickey ears of a specific style). Person told me no and quoted me $130 with a 3 week wait time for a physical product that was something I could print in about an hour myself. For a Disney product they were already infringing on themselves.

Went elsewhere and found someone selling the model for $7. Figured that was fair for the effort to transform it into a model file.

Turned out I was wrong - only took me 20 minutes to print.

Some of these artists are ridiculous....

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Today@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

Awesome! Is that a real device that's available for sale? Those would be good school or scout projects to donate to animal shelters.

[-] Kickass3DPrints@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

I have the STL files on Thangs for 3D printing.

[-] Today@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

I've been thinking about getting a 3D printer. Well, yesterday I decided I need a 3D printer. I know nothing at all. What should I get?

[-] DaGeek247@fedia.io 9 points 5 months ago

Don't get an ender unless you want your hobby to be working on the printer. That's fine, but it's not the same as having something ready to go when you unbox it.

Prusa printers are quality and open source; very much worth supporting if you have the money. Your hobby will be printing things for other things if you get one.

Bambu printers are cheap, but not open source. However, you will spend most of your time actually making stuff instead of fixing the printer.

Cheap, reliable, open source/modifiable. Pick two.

[-] Kickass3DPrints@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

I have a 3D printer buyer's guide on my website that lists a few. I mostly use and would recommend any Bambu printer, there's a few that can suit any price range. Elegoo also make good printers too which won't break the bank

[-] EvilBit@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

I have an AnkerMake M5 and it’s gloriously painless. There are intrinsic unavoidable challenges to 3D printing, but this thing has been incredible for casual creation.

https://www.ankermake.com/

[-] Today@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Do I need the M5 or can I get away with the m5c? I really know nothing about it or how much material things need. I just want to make cool things. How much filament did your cardboard cutter require?

[-] EvilBit@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I’m not the OP but I went ahead and bought his file and sliced* it and with 20% infill, it will require about 77g of filament. So with one normal spool, you could print 12 of them.

I can only vouch directly for the M5, but looking into the differences, it looks like the M5C would be a solid option. I would miss the onboard camera and the ability to check my prints and get notifications of suspicious issues, but the printer itself is more or less the same otherwise.

Edit: and with the current sale, $200 is a STEAL

  • Slicing is the process where a program takes the 3D model and turns it into layer by layer instructions for the printer and where you configure lots of settings such as infill, which is how much of the interior of the model is printed with a lattice for structural support. Prints are rarely 100% solid material but rather a hull with infill.
[-] Today@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

I ordered the m5c. I got the printer, 13 lb of material, and some accessories for $339. Can't wait to make some Braille Play-Doh presses.

[-] EvilBit@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Nice! Congrats and I hope you enjoy it!

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Ender 3 is pretty good introductory model and does nice prints with little effort.

If you're a buy once, cry once sort of person, Prusa makes good stuff that has a lot of community support.

[-] bbuez@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

I own an Ender 3, 5, and a Prusa Mini. The mini is by far my most reliable printer, but both enders have had a lot of work done to them to get them where they are.. and not quite click to print yet.

At one of my jobs I maintained some 35 Prusa Mk3s, about a dozen Elegoo's, and witnessed their graveyard of Anycubics and some other brands. The Prusa's generally only needed to be unclogged or have their nozzle changed less than once a month, with only a couple failures per week max, the room also was not temperature controlled and they had some.. questionable engineering practices.

The elego's were like pulling teeth, needing glue to keep it adhered, frequent clogs and skips, thermistors needing replacement after under 100 print hours, blobbing would get into the part coolig fans. Small leveling knobs. Prusa's IMO were designed to be serviceable, but seem to need it way less.

Especially at a business, the premium on Prusa printers over say bambu labs is well worth their customer support. Ive never used a Bambu so I cant necessarily recommended or not, and I do wish I had an MMU on the cheap as you'd get with their mini, but Im most pleased with my Prusa mini

[-] Today@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

I looked at prusa and pretty quickly realized that I couldn't afford them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

A lot of libraries offer 3D printing for about the cost of materials.

It's worth trying out before dropping huge cash if it's possible near you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] B0rax@feddit.org 16 points 5 months ago

I have used something like that. The blade dulls pretty quickly and it is a lot of work. I got 2 or 3 usable cat scratchers out of one blade.

Given that one cat scratcher cost something like 2,50€, it simply wasnt worth it for me.

[-] penquin@lemm.ee 10 points 5 months ago

My cat will still go to the couch 🫠

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 7 points 5 months ago

Depending on what that couch has been through, it might be about marking/refreshing territory.

But also understand that there are different kinds of scratching materials and structure. My cat only likes the cardboard kind in a small A3-ish box and that is more because she likes to move it around. For actual scratching she very much prefers the ropier material in something sturdy at a 90 or 45 degree angle that she can really push against without it moving.

And I've NEVER seen a cat actually like one of those free standing scratching posts after the first time they push it over during a more energetic session.

[-] Zorque@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

My two cats prefer them. Even the new one we got (and need to replace) that keeps falling on top of one of them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 5 months ago

Is the hot glue pretty good for standing up to kitty abuse? I was thinking PVA glue, but a glue gun would make things quicker.

[-] Kickass3DPrints@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

My two are pretty good with not eating things they shouldn't so I just made sure stringy bits were cleaned up. Googling says PVA/wood glue is safer for cats but I would check brands if they are non-toxic

[-] catbum@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

I love this! Free cat scratchers might not seem like they have much value, but has anyone seen the price of those ready-made things?! They're pushing $20 for a large-ish flat scratcher at lower volume places like TSC, but Target isn't much better, still $10 for a 10" x 18" flat cheapy.

Down with bougie cat cardboard!!!

That looks a lot easier than gluing a stack of boxes together and cutting off slabs with a bandsaw like I was planning.

I guess this is my excuse to finally finish calibrating my new extruder setup.

[-] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Reminder to avoid using Amazon boxes for this: Their boxes contain a rodenticide to keep rats/mice away from their products.

[-] GeorgeLightning@lemmy.world 30 points 5 months ago

Reminder to check snopes before believing random internet factoids:

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/amazon-spray-boxes-chemicals/

[-] Coherence@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Thank you, I’m educated and savvy and I almost fell for that. Why oh WHY are there sooooo many trolls about?

[-] DannyBoy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago

This sounds like a Facebook fact.

Oh yep it is.

[-] stooth64@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

Is there a source on this? My initial fact check search suggests this was debunked.

[-] johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

This is cool but my cat won't touch cardboard scratchers.

[-] yetiftw@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2024
603 points (100.0% liked)

3DPrinting

16536 readers
141 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe/ may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS