55

'cuz I definitely do

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] mii@awful.systems 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

If they're going to make this, I will coerce my daughter into coercing my wife to let me buy it.

[-] self@awful.systems 13 points 3 weeks ago

you can’t just put me at financial risk like this

[-] froztbyte@awful.systems 11 points 3 weeks ago

yeah I was grimacing at the partlist, but I think I'd still do it

I haven't meaningfully touched lego in like 15y and haven't engaged with basically any of the starwars-y or latter-decades kits at all. but for this.. it'd make a hell of a sweet display piece

[-] self@awful.systems 10 points 3 weeks ago

I really hope the complexity doesn’t make it a no-go for Lego — honestly this is one of the only times I’d be in support of custom pieces if it makes assembly easier or the machine more durable

I haven’t really engaged with Lego at all since I got into 3D printing, but them going “fuck it we’ll do mechanical computation” would definitely pull me back in. this is exactly the kind of thing that’d be a major pain to do with printed parts, where consistent and durable standardized parts would do a lot better

[-] o7___o7@awful.systems 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

broke: acausal blackmail

woke: acausal trade

bespoke: acausal marketing

[-] Soyweiser@awful.systems 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Neat!

E: also, this means that if the AI = AGI people are right, lego could be used to run an intelligence.

[-] swlabr@awful.systems 7 points 2 weeks ago

Me: steps on lego brick

Simulation voice of god: “THE BASILISK SENDS ITS REGARDS!”

[-] Soyweiser@awful.systems 4 points 2 weeks ago

Yud finally has a tool that even the acausalrobotgod fears

[-] mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 weeks ago

Cool idea but the build techniques would have to modified for the mass market.

[-] froztbyte@awful.systems 5 points 3 weeks ago
[-] mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 weeks ago

So in the video there were two things that made me go ‘ahh that’s not really gonna fly for a mass marketed product’

One was the multiple beams at specific positions on multiple axles that require a lot of fine tuning.

Either you’d have to pack the axle with other pieces to make it fool proof or these would get out of whack over time causing issues.

The other (more problematic) issue IMO was the rotating mechanism at the top of the build. This seemed to use non-standard spacing by having rigid hose pieces connected to the 24 tooth gear.

Just don’t think that would ever fly and would need to be reengineered.

[-] froztbyte@awful.systems 3 points 2 weeks ago

yeah, but like .... yeah? this is a thing someone put together from the spectrum of existing parts, to show the viability, and pitch as a kit because it's neat

pretty obviously any commercial version of it would have to be more buttoned up. that's literally in the product design loop

[-] breckenedge@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago
[-] froztbyte@awful.systems 2 points 2 weeks ago

can't tell if you were joking or are unfamiliar with what a turing machine is

this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2024
55 points (100.0% liked)

NotAwfulTech

347 readers
1 users here now

a community for posting cool tech news you don’t want to sneer at

non-awfulness of tech is not required or else we wouldn’t have any posts

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS