399
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] mholiv@lemmy.world 110 points 1 year ago

Is Lemmy full of sovereign citizens now days? In all countries including China when you drive dangerously you get a ticket.

[-] CodexArcanum@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago
[-] mholiv@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago

People should still be punished for driving dangerously. Civil forfeiture is another issue.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 17 points 1 year ago

Feel free to point out in the meme where the driver was driving dangerously.

[-] mholiv@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The same place it says it’s for civil forfeiture. This being said the police officer does have a ticket in hand which implies some sort of safety violation.

This comic could be taking place in China. The same scene could play out. Nothing specific to injustice in the USA here.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 6 points 1 year ago

You'd lick the boot in China too, but nice try.

[-] mholiv@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

If I was driving dangerously it would only be just that I be punished proportionately. Same goes for everyone in every country.

If you call that boot licking so be it.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 5 points 1 year ago

Who

Is

Driving

Dangerously?

Assumptions in your head don't count anymore than anything else in there.

[-] desktop_user 2 points 1 year ago

expired registration is not a safety issue

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

If your state doesn't do safety inspections that's something you should talk with a state legislator about.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

And yet this meme is clearly about traffic enforcement.

[-] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago

First you have to stops the cars to gets the money.

I'm sure the Ferengi could have said it better.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

If you can help us get rid of cars then great. Otherwise, yes we need some kind of accountability on people driving several tons of metal at insane speeds.

load more comments (4 replies)

Well yeah. If you search for a topic, the top results should be relevant. That's how searching is supposed to work.

[-] Old_Yharnam@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

I’m not driving, I’m traveling!!!

[-] auzy@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

That was my exact first impression of this post.

Basically Sovcit nonsense

[-] alphanerd4@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Fuck off. If I had a button to ban every person who upvoted it I would. Local governments all over the country make up enormous percentages of their yearly budget directly taken from the citizens in the form of “parking enforcement”. Nobody said sovereign citizen anything this is a specific issue of police and what they’re for and who they do it to. Huff glue and choke:

[-] mholiv@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Are you saying this ironically? Everyone I don’t like should be banned and should die? This seems really authoritarian to me.

[-] zeekaran@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 year ago

Complaints about parking enforcement? Clearly not a fuck cars member.

I heavily suggest you Google "monopoly on violence"

[-] mholiv@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We don’t need to start from Hobbes to understand that, as a society, punishing dangerous drivers is a good thing.

There is a lot of good reading out there. I recommend this as a starting point when coming to an understanding of violence and society.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leviathan_(Hobbes_book)

[-] Yeller_king@reddthat.com 5 points 1 year ago

Sure, but if simply keeping the roads safe was their only objective, they wouldn't have things like quotas where they have to shake down a certain number of people for the sake of their budget.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

That depends a lot on the quota system. If they're easily achievable then it's not going to incentivize bad stops. If you have a county that gets four cars a day and the quota is four cars then there's a problem. Generally it's a useful way to make sure your police aren't sitting at the donut shop while they should be working. Like most policies its problems lie in the extremes.

[-] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

In addition to issuing tickets officers all over the country take the opportunity to seize what they in their sole judgment regard as suspicious amounts of cash without benefit of a trial or charges. Many such seizures are in the mere hundreds of dollars with the average seizure only $1200 and the legal cost to reclaim such is usually in the thousands so people are left without recourse. Even when the money is reclaimed there is no punishment for officers for essentially robbing the populace.

In the last 20 years they have taken about 70B from citizens mostly without actually charging the person they stole from and disproportionately from minorities.

Regarding the victims, many people especially contractors prefer to deal in cash and frequently carry a significant amount of cash on hand to purchase goods and pay help. Others transport large quantities of cash from their business or to make large purchases particularly used cars purchased from owners instead of dealerships.

[-] el_abuelo@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

Woah that's a lot. Source?

[-] Zink@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

Civil asset forfeiture used to be all the rage in outrage.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_forfeiture_in_the_United_States

[-] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I mean depending on the state or even the town that officer is going to take any cash they have on them and might shoot them if they don't comply...

[-] mholiv@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don’t think so. I mean cops can be jerks but they’re really not dumb enough to just risk their jobs for $40 USD out of someone’s wallet. Let alone build a culture out of this.

Civil forfeiture of greater than $1000 USD where that stuff gets documented and people have the prove the “innocence” of that money on the other had is another issue.

Cops stopping people for cash just feels like a childish characterization. There are enough real problems with police to address (ie systematic racism and nepotism) no need to work with characterizations.

[-] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

I generally agree with you but have you not seen the news? They get away with killing innocent people illegally all the time. Do you think they're actually afraid of getting in trouble over stealing 40 bucks?

[-] mholiv@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And that stuff is terrible. But I think it’s caused by systematic racism. (aka what we should actually worry about)

Like the comic empathizes the wrong thing. It reduces valid concerns with police to the level of sovereign citizens.

[-] Beacon@fedia.io 88 points 1 year ago

Getting a ticket for driving unsafely around others, while on a public road provided by the government for the people to use to get where they want to go... yes, surely this is authoritarianism /s

[-] Malfeasant@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

If we could count on unsafe drivers getting tickets, then maybe that would be acceptable, but that's not how it works. It's really hard to quantity "safety". It's really easy to quantity speed. It's difficult to quantify what speed is safe, so in most cases, we pick an arbitrary number, which damn near everyone ignores. At least where I live, 5 over is a minimum, 10-15 over is common. So cops can pretty much pull anyone over at a whim. And they do. But they don't make a dent in actual unsafe driving.

[-] Korne127@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Monopoly on violence is literally something good. The biggest problem in the US is that this just doesn't exist (see gun legislation), which leads to all the school shootings and a more militarized police.

[-] jwiggler@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Violence doesn't just become good because you legitimize it through the state.

[-] anton 7 points 1 year ago

But there can be less of it, if it is exercised by a monopoly.

[-] jwiggler@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago

Nah, it just institutionalizes it and perpetuates it in a different form -- namely structural violence. It's oppressive and coercive in nature, ultimately used to protect the interests of those with property and further instantiate inequality.

You can't eliminate violence through violence. You have to meet people's basic needs. A society that coerces people to act a particular way -- especially in regards to meeting their basic needs -- through the threat of force could not have been built on freedom, or compassion, or mutual solidarity. It's unjust, imo

[-] bi_tux@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

no, it's not something good, look at Honkong, Tibet, Russia, Iran, Belarus, etc.

[-] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Are you advocating for multiple, competing armed groups in the US?

Generally, a monopoly on the legitimate use of force is considered a cornerstone of "government".

[-] bi_tux@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I don't like the government, I'm an anarcho-syndicalist. that means different syndicates would be armed and they'd probably be competing, so yeah, I'm advocating for multiple armed forces

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

In most states nothing happens. If they have you on body camera then they can match it to the driver's license database. You're going to get your ticket and another for driving off, in the mail.

[-] Subverb@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

In what universe is this paradise?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
399 points (100.0% liked)

US Authoritarianism

1329 readers
1 users here now

ChonkyOwlbear is an Illegitimate Usurper

There's other groups and you are welcome to add to them. USAuthoritarianism Linktree

See Also, my website. USAuthoritarianism.com be advised at time of writing it is basically just a donate link

Cool People: !thepoliceproblem@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS