473
submitted 1 month ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Everyone knows that electric vehicles are supposed to be better for the planet than gas cars. That's the driving reason behind a global effort to transition toward batteries.

But what about the harms caused by mining for battery minerals? And coal-fired power plants for the electricity to charge the cars? And battery waste? Is it really true that EVs are better?

The answer is yes. But Americans are growing less convinced.

The net benefits of EVs have been frequently fact-checked, including by NPR. "No technology is perfect, but the electric vehicles are going to offer a significant benefit as compared to the internal combustion engine vehicles," Jessika Trancik, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, told NPR this spring.

It's important to ask these questions about EVs' hidden costs, Trancik says. But they have been answered "exhaustively"


her word


and a widerange of organizations have confirmed that EVs still beat gas.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago

can you really blame us?

let me run through the last 8 years of American history with four words, "we were lied to". doesn't matter from whom, doesn't matter what. we're constantly being lied to. truth is, it's been true for longer than 8 years, but the last 8 have been especially transparent.

we're learning that the upper echelon only trusts the American public to do three things; consume, produce, and die. if you can't even do that for them, you're removed as an undesirable.

so yeah, trust in the system is broken. it's going to take at least a generation or two just to repair it ** if they work on it**.

I can't fault anyone who's untrusting of a system that continuously covers lie after lie with more lies.

[-] JackFrostNCola@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

8 Years?

How long did fossil fuel companies know about climate change?
How long did the fuel industry know about the effects of leaded petrol?
How long did cigarette companies know about links to cancer?
How long did pharma companies know about opioid addiction risk?
How long did social networking companies know about psychological manipulation?
How long did the sugar lobby know about their links to diabetes and obesity?
How long did the manufacturing companies know about PFAS and microplastics?

I would say you have always been lied to.

[-] hedgehogging_the_bed@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Your forgot that plastic manufacturing knew it wasn't recycled or recyclable.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago

I can't fault anyone who's untrusting of a system that continuously covers lie after lie with more lies

I can and will. Learn some basic critical thinking skills and apply them. Throwing your hands up and ranting about how "the system is broken" is mopey teenager shit.

Things are far more complicated than your whiny rant. They world is shades of gray rather than the simplistic "bad guy in black / good guy in white" situation that you characterize it as.

[-] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 36 points 1 month ago

Public transportation is even better yet

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

And when we actually get that going I'll stop making sure I always have a car available.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago
[-] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 29 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The US used to have an incredibly comprehensive rail network, combined with street cars in every town. This "public transit is only for cities" nonsense is pro car propaganda.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 19 points 1 month ago

You can still have public transit/trains on suburban areas. See Germany or the Netherlands.

[-] Krauerking@lemy.lol 12 points 1 month ago

Or Japan, or China, or South Korea, or Italy, or Argentina, or Lancaster PA, or parts of New Jersey even. Fuck man so many places have public transit.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Saw a rural bus system working perfectly fine in South America. If they can figure it out, so can we.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

An even larger portion of America can't afford them, so it doesn't even matter.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

The only valid criticisms of EV's are:

  1. They're harder to extinguish than a gas car if they end up catching on fire.

  2. They don't really solve any of the major issues with car based infrastructure.

  3. Tesla is a shit show because of that damn muskrat which pushes a lot of people away from EV's in general.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Over the longterm, and they also require a lot less maintenance because they don't have to deal with mini-explosions from combustion generating excess heat and stress. The problem is in the battery, and the industry hasn't even scratched the surface for solutions.

I see trucks carrying butane tanks all the time, where are the trucks carrying EV battery replacements? There aren't because the industry wants to charge extra for fixed installation ones depending on capacity and charging capacity and there is absolutely no profit incentive that offsets other losses to standardize battery systems in a way they can be easily extensible or replaceable.

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

Put them in a sealed room with a gas engine running and you'll see how fast they realize that they're cleaner

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Cleaner than gas cars =/= Clean.

This is the lowest possible bar to pass. The point isn't that EVs are worse than gas. The point is that both are terrible for people, health, safety, climate, transit, sustainability, equity, freedom, etc.

[-] Eximius@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Wut. Cars have legitimate uses.

EVs dont only not pollute wherever they drive, but overall are probably around 70% efficient if including the power generation, while gas is 40% or less.

The others, I think you are projecting US problems to the whole self-owned transportation sector.

So what’s your plan? Ban cars? Good luck.

[-] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 15 points 1 month ago

Genuine question - are EVs better for the environment if the main source of electricity of my country is coal based? Most of the coal plants are pretty old too…

[-] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago

Yes, whether your electric plant is coal, natural gas, or honestly even if it was diesel. Larger engines are more efficient than smaller ones. It's been a long time since I broke down the math over 10 years so my information is probably wildly out of date but even 10 years ago when you broke down the math charging an EV from a fossil fuel plant of any kind was still ultimately more efficient than a gas car in the long term.

Couple that with the ability of many EV now to also act as a battery for your house and that just goes wildly into the EVs favor if you utilize that for peak demand offset. Which many people could do easily even if it meant not having their battery fully charged in the morning when they go to leave for work because let's face it very few people drive more than 60 miles full round trip in a day so even with their battery at say half they would have more than enough for their whole day plus extra.

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

Yes. That's the entire point here. The answer is yes.

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 14 points 1 month ago

EVs have a lot of advantages over ICEs. It's good that things are evolving finally to make EVs more than a niche. It however doesn't remove the problem that they are still a car with all of those negatives, even if they pollute much less. In some ways providing an individual solution could harm efforts to reduce the number of cars on the road. It's not a final solution, only a step to fix a few of the most obvious problems while retaining others.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Its about 40% more power efficient per mile but theres a couple of other trade-offs, still better yeah.

[-] ninekeysdown@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Because we Americans are easily swayed by propaganda, unfortunately.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Because the conservative machine, despite the love of Elon's right-wing antics, never stop talking about how bad EVs are. Funny, the only time they act like they care about the environment is when they talk about how bad the EV batteries are to manufacture. While they roll coal and drive gas-guzzling mall cruiser bro-dozers all over the place.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

zombie engineer voice "traiiiiiins"

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago

Not surprising. There has been a pretty successful campaign by the right to paint EVs as worse for the environment because we get our electricity from coal (we barely get anything from coal) and mining; more expensive to fuel up (using the highest priced fast charging vs lowest price of gas); and worse from a humanitarian perspective (cobalt mining).

Things to refute this: EVs, even with coal power as their energy source, emit less CO2 over the lifespan of the vehicle compared with gas vehicles. Mining sucks and is indeed environmentally damaging but oil is also fucking terrible. The benefit of EVs is that the vast majority of a battery can be recycled whereas oil is single use. So to meet a consistent demand, we do have to ramp up mining but once the demands is met, mining can be scaled back dramatically.

For fuel costs, it's easy to do the basic math but many don't. I've seen people complain that their electricity bill will just skyrocket. When I suggested my parents get a battery powered riding mower, my mom thought they would be more expensive and that the electricity bill would be just as much as the gas bill. The price of the mower is the same and the electricity cost was about 1/15th of what has is and you don't have to be riding around in gas fumes.

As for the humanitarian angle, the right obviously does not really give a shit. You could easily point out the atrocities that oil companies have done over the years. You could also point out that cobalt is being phased out. We could also do the mining here instead of having our done abroad. And there is the previous point that most of this just had to be done once then mining can be scaled back.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
473 points (100.0% liked)

News

23296 readers
2823 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS