american museums can only have looted artefacts. Stolen from either native americans, or foreign countries.
A true “real american” artefact couldn’t be older than 200 years.
american museums can only have looted artefacts. Stolen from either native americans, or foreign countries.
A true “real american” artefact couldn’t be older than 200 years.
Don't many museums have a display trade thing going on, where they cycle some of the displays they aren't using right now to other museums?
There are modern museums that display more contemporary artifacts. While yes, there are plenty of massive museums that house art from many different cultures and time periods. You can't forget the smaller, more focused museums. So they don't "only" hold looted artifacts. I know it's popular to say the US doesn't have it's own culture, but for the past 200 years it certainly has developed some iconic art (Andy Warhol Museum, Norman Rockwell museum) and culture (The Spy Museum, Air and Space Museum). Age isn't the only metric that merits placement in a museum.
Doesn't every large museum have this problem?
In this case, the argument seems pretty cut and dry. The provenance of the item is very important, and it is shocking how many artifacts go 'missing' from one museum's storage only to wind up on display in another.
A Nepali community in the Fediverse.