529

The United Nations General Assembly voted 124-14 on Wednesday to strip Israel of the right to self-defense in the West Bank, Gaza and east Jerusalem.

The test of the resolution was based on the International Court of Justice’s advisory opinion in July that Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territory was illegal.

The resolution also calls on member states not to sell arms or military equipment to Israel that would be used in Gaza, the West Bank, and east Jerusalem.

Among the 43 countries that abstained were Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom. Some 12 of the 27 European Union countries abstained, including Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Italy, Lithuania, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Sweden.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 124 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Why list a select 15 abstainers in the summary rather than the 14 voting against? Besides the obvious ones (Israel, US, Czechia), there's Hungary, Argentina, Paraguay, Papua New Guinea, Fiji, Palau, Nauru, Malawi, Tuvalu, Tonga and Micronesia.

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago

Besides the obvious Genocide Joe administration countries like Palau, Tuvalu, and Micronesia do not evoke much significance.

Rather I found listing the more mainstream countries still silently supporting israel and refusing to condemn their obvious violation of international law more interesting.

On closer consideration Hungary might be of relevance, since they are allegedly responsible for the recent israeli supply chain terror attack on Lebanon.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 21 points 1 month ago

Why do all the Polynesian countries support Israel so strongly?

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 36 points 1 month ago

They nearly always follow USA in voting, so Israel gets supported indirectly.

[-] Eiim 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The COFA states are very strongly aligned with the US and pretty much always vote with them. I don't know much about, say, Tonga, but I'm guessing it's a way of signaling cooperation to the US as well.

[-] glaber@lemm.ee 14 points 1 month ago
[-] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It is possible none of us will live to see Czechia vote against the interest of Israel as all parties support it and there is pretty much no organized pro-Palestine movement. Israel says we're their top partners in the eastern hemisphere, which means a lot because most countries are in the eastern hemisphere, including itself. At least, aid toward them is not nearly as popular among politicians and citizens as for Ukraine (we have a sizable, well-behaved Ukrainian minority already and took the most refugees per capita at the height of the crisis).

As for why pretty much every politician is either oblivious or bootlicking Israel: see my comment under a post about the shredder escapade 4 months ago

[-] glaber@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago

Thank you for the explanation! Such a shame that anti-Zionism is so often conflated with antisemitism

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 66 points 1 month ago

"Rights" can only be taken away by force, if there is no method to ensure compliance, this is yet another meaningless resolution.

[-] scutiger@lemmy.world 80 points 1 month ago

The UN is a diplomatic organization. It is a forum to discuss things and literally has no actual means to enforce anything. Its goal is not enforcement, it's to discuss.

[-] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 54 points 1 month ago

Exactly. Every time the UN does something, people say "they can't enforce it".

Well, that's the whole point of the UN. To resolve things without using force.

It's a good design, designed by people who learned from the horrors of WW2.

It's sad to see how many people nowadays forget those lessons and are itching for global war.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] filister@lemmy.world 45 points 1 month ago

And prevent such global wars like WWII. Funnily enough, the state of Israel was funded exactly by an UN resolution, and now Israel is trying to discredit the same institution that's responsible for the existence of their state.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] HowMany@lemmy.ml 50 points 1 month ago

It's not self defense when they're the ones attacking.

[-] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 47 points 1 month ago

Ashamed that my country abstained here

[-] kerrypacker@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago
[-] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

It’s obvious why OP is ashamed. But why aren’t you? Proud of your nation’s quiet support of a genocide?

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 36 points 1 month ago

The headline is genocide apologia and should be banned.

[-] erenkoylu@lemmy.ml 35 points 1 month ago

We need to expel Israel from the UN. These religious fanatics have no place in the civilized world.

[-] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 28 points 1 month ago

Removing a country from the UN for doing horrible things would defeat the UN's entire purpose.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Good time to expel Iran as well

[-] erenkoylu@lemmy.ml 37 points 1 month ago

Israeli fanatics have killed more people in a year than Iran has in decades. Israel is a terrorist entity.

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Whilst I disagree with your earlier point about expelling Israel from the UN (or anybody else: the whole point of the place is as a diplomatic talking shop for everybody) I wholehartedly agree with this one.

[-] wheelsbot@lemm.ee 29 points 1 month ago

Israel is illegally occupying Palestine. The violence they commit is the furthest possible thing from self defense.

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

What a shitty title and crappy biased article. That's not what the resolution was about.

Here's the Washington Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2024/09/19/un-resolution-israel-palestinian-territory-countries-vote/

U.N. General Assembly demands Israel end occupation of Palestinian territory The nonbinding resolution says Israel must end its “unlawful presence” within a year, pull out military forces, halt settlement expansion and evacuate settlers.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Jollyllama@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

Is this just symbolic? Does it levy any penalties for not complying?

[-] Eiim 31 points 1 month ago

The resolution has declaratory power only but provides international backing to those countries that want to take additional steps against Israel.

[-] PanArab@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 month ago

They never had that right to begin with. A foreign military force has no right to self defense from the occupied people.

[-] Enkrod@feddit.org 18 points 1 month ago

Germany abstaining is actually a big deal.

The defense of Israel is one of our "Reason of State" and not voting in favour of Israel is a serious signal that politicians are fed up with Netanyahus bullshit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

Looks like israel doesn't have the right to defend itself.

[-] potate@lemmy.ca 77 points 1 month ago

There's a difference between defending oneself and engaging in collective punishment and genocide. I am Jewish and the descendent of holocaust survivors. Not in my name.

[-] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 month ago

You're awesome - have a great day. Thank you.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 8 points 1 month ago

I mean yes, but this ruling is fhat they can't do either. Since these regions are illegally occupied, their inhabitants have the right to resist said occupation and, therefore Israel doesn't have the right to defend itself in the same way it would against an independent country.

[-] sweng@programming.dev 43 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

in the West Bank, Gaza and east Jerusalem.

[-] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 20 points 1 month ago

Yup. Israel is treating them like land that's free to colonize, when in reality a nation (albeit one with unstable government, and only recently UN-recognized) lives there.
Similarly, Japan can't claim it's "defending itself" if it hypothetically performs violent acts in Lebanon.

[-] erenkoylu@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 month ago

Israel has been murdering Palestinians for decades now. It's a country founded on mass murder and genocide.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Crikeste@lemm.ee 16 points 1 month ago

Given that its ‘defence’ is indiscriminately bombing civilian populations and blowing the limbs off children, they shouldn’t be allowed to. Israel shouldn’t have committed war crimes similar to the Nazis.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SoJB@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 month ago

Shoutout to the libs wetting their pants over non-Russian weapons being used against Ukraine

I’m not sure what could be worse than literally bulldozing all of Palestine to the ground and killing the survivors that crawl out. And that is not hyperbole. Literal bulldozers are going in a line through Palestine.

Maybe PugJesus can enlighten us?

[-] atoro@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago
[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago

Israel and Kyle Rittenhouse can agree on one thing, it's totally cool to kill people and then pretend you were defending yourself

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
529 points (100.0% liked)

World News

32286 readers
407 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS