1603
Be careful. (feddit.org)
submitted 2 months ago by 101@feddit.org to c/technology@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Kethal@lemmy.world 191 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It seemed odd to me that a Web site could write to or read from the clipboard without the user approving it. That would be a pretty obvious security and privacy issue. From what I gather, on Chrome sites can write to the clipboard without approval, but they need approval to read. ~~On Firefox and others any access requires permission. Thus this exploit seems limited to Chrome users.~~

@SkaveRat pointed out that it doesn't require permission, only interaction. So likely there's a button that's clicked that writes to the clipboard, and most browsers are susceptible to this.

[-] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 168 points 2 months ago

not when there was a user intent like clicking a button.

For example in this screenshot, it's likely that there's only the "verify I'm human" button first, you click it, the steps pop up, and at the same time the command ist copied into your clipboard

[-] MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world 88 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Exactly, copy requires a click but there's no rule that the copy button has to look like anything particular

[-] dan@upvote.au 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It doesn't necessarily need a click - it can be triggered by a keypress too (eg at my workplace we have a few internal pages where you can press a keyboard shortcut to copy a shortened URL for the current page).

It has to be something the browser considers a user interaction, meaning the user has expressed an intent to perform the action. That's usually a button press or keypress.

[-] lando55@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Why isn't the default behavior for browsers to not allow access to the clipboard? Similar to how it prompts you for access to camera/microphone

Edit: On a per-site basis, like if you use the Zoom website it asks you for access to the webcam, would something like this work for clipboard as well or would it break stuff?

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Interstellar_1 137 points 2 months ago

That's a sneaky one.

[-] BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world 126 points 2 months ago

This is actually pretty smart because it switches the context of the action. Most intermediate users avoid clicking random executables by instinct but this is different enough that it doesn't immediately trigger that association and response.

[-] ghurab@lemmy.world 123 points 2 months ago

This reminds of when I was 13 I used to tell my opponents in Warcraft 3 that pessing alt+q+q quickly reveals the map. It's a shortcut for closing the game. Worked way to many times

I do see this working

[-] TwanHE@lemmy.world 51 points 2 months ago

ALT+F4 for free funds, opened alot of slots on bfh servers whenever my friends couldn't join.

[-] theangryseal@lemmy.world 41 points 2 months ago

Haha, god I loved doing this on Counter-Strike. “Did you guys hear about the hidden tit pics in counter strike? No shit, hold alt and press f4 and it shows the best tits I’ve ever seen. I don’t know how game developers get away with this stuff.”

Half the lobby is gone, the other half is laughing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lurch@sh.itjust.works 46 points 2 months ago

btw if you want to try and hack me, my IP is 127.0.0.1

[-] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 35 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yeah, and you can dupe items in RuneScape by dropping them and pressing Alt+F4. Don’t worry, I’ll stand way over here to prove I’m not trying to steal it. If I try to pick up the item you’ll see me move, and you can just pick it up first.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 94 points 2 months ago

So inventive these guys. If only we could harness that ingenuity for the common good instead, it would have a huge impact.

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 53 points 2 months ago

Fwiw there are a large number of people who volunteer their time and effort toward worthwhile projects. It's just they don't get rewarded anywhere near the level of benefit that they provide.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] GraniteM@lemmy.world 50 points 2 months ago

"To prove that you are human, donate $$$ to Doctors Without Borders."

"To prove that you are human, register to vote."

"To prove that you are human, adopt a pet from the local animal shelter."

[-] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 months ago

“To prove that you are human, adopt a pet from the local animal shelter.”

I've got 22 cats already, but I need to check my email!

[-] GraniteM@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago

PLEASE ADOPT VERIFICATION CAT TO CONTINUE

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 85 points 2 months ago

I almost fell for an unrelated scam just a couple months ago. Basically, I was on vacation visiting family, had just gotten a new phone (w/ GrapheneOS, so it didn't have Google's network of spam detection), and was out and about at the time. Here's how it went down:

  1. received text earlier that day saying that my CC was used for an unauthorized purchase (happens a couple times/year)
  2. got a call from someone claiming to be my bank (not one of the popular chains like Chase or whatever)
  3. caller asked me to verify myself through text code, and I didn't read the text message carefully and provided it (later inspection showed that it was a password reset code)
  4. after going through some (fake) recent transactions, I told them they all sounded fraudulent (they were on the other side of the country)
  5. they asked me to confirm myself again through another code to finalize, at which point I told them they don't need a second code since I already proved my identity, and they hung up

I immediately went to go reset my password and found I was locked out, so I called my bank. They confirmed that my account had been automatically locked for suspicion of fraud (good job!!) and confirmed what I suspected, the scammer had reset my password (first code) and was attempting to add an external account (second code). Had I given them that second code, they likely would have been able to submit the transfer and it would've been a giant headache to try to get that money back.

I didn't lose anything and I immediately improved the security on my account, but I felt like an idiot for letting them get that far. I had also recently consolidated my other accounts to this one, so this would've been a big blow. They changed my account numbers, I changed my username and password, and they held my account for a week or so to ensure everything was good. This bank is one of the few that actually cares about security, so I set up voice recognition (they said they track it anyway, this just turns on an extra feature) and Symantec VIP (I prefer my regular TOTP app, but they don't support that).

I don't think it'll happen to me again, but I was still surprised that I got so far through the process before recognizing that it's a scam. And I consider myself pretty security conscious (e.g. I use TOTP everywhere, password manager, keep credit bureaus frozen, etc). I guess they got my info from a breach somewhere because they knew my name, my username (to be fair, I used it everywhere), and the bank I use (could've gotten lucky). I have since changed most of my usernames to be random, so hopefully I'll be more safe going forward.

Anyway, stay on your guard, it can happen to you.

[-] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 42 points 2 months ago

Pro-tip: Whenever you receive a call/text/email from "your bank" saying something is wrong, don't interact!

Open their app/website or call them yourself to verify.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dan@upvote.au 30 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I set up voice recognition

This feature is extremely insecure now that there's several AIs that can replicate voices. If a scammer calls you and you say a few words (like if you say "hello" and "sorry, I think you've got the wrong number"), a recording of that can be enough for them to replicate your voice.

This happened at my workplace. An attacker got into someone's Schwab account by calling Schwab support and successfully getting past the voice verification, and attempted to transfer $100k (from a recent stock sale) out of their account. It took a bit of effort but they managed to get all the money back.

Schwab sent out a bulk email to everyone at my company saying they're improving their security as a result, but I'm not sure if they've actually improved it. They're still promoting this insecure feature.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 25 points 2 months ago

Your story reminds me of something that my bank started doing. I got a robocall about something to do with my credit card, and the voice said to verify using x and y using my keypad, I think it was day/month/year of birth or something and I immediately noped out of the call. I hit all the wrong buttons until it got me to a person and I ripped them apart, and their supervisor for basically training their userbase to answer security questions given by an automatic voice on the other end of the line with no way to verify who is calling.

You can spoof your caller ID, you can get a text to speech robocall bot with DTMF recognition and just spam call a whole area where the bank operates and gather a bunch of personal information because it sounds just like the bank and there's no way to prove who called.

What a crock of shit. It's a security nightmare.

I did call my bank after at a known valid number, verified them as they verified me, and there was something going on, so the call was legit, and totally unacceptable.

These clowns want us to trust them completely, and give us no reason to do so, but they want us to bend over backwards to validate ourselves. Fuck that.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 22 points 2 months ago

The fact that many banks still don't have at least app-based 2FA should be criminal.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

Step 3 was your earliest big clue. You'll never give that to a person. You'll only ever be asked to enter it on the website it originated from.

That being said, the other commentors are right too.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 64 points 2 months ago

Kinda brilliant to disguise malware as a captcha, though. I won’t be surprised.

[-] cmrn@lemmy.world 63 points 2 months ago

As someone tech literate that looks hilarious to follow through with.

But if not, that really does seem similar to a normal captcha with fairly simple steps.

[-] Hikermick@lemmy.world 54 points 2 months ago

Usually I warn my 81 year old dad about these scams. Don't think I need to worry about this one, he wouldn't be tech savvy enough to find the windows button

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ClassifiedPancake@discuss.tchncs.de 46 points 2 months ago

That’s so sassy I kinda respect it.

Too bad for those who fall for it.

[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 44 points 2 months ago

Instructions were unclear, ransomware dev now owes me 0.15 bitcoin.

[-] JohnyRocket@discuss.tchncs.de 35 points 2 months ago

/s no I wouldn't actually implement it

[-] zephorah@lemm.ee 30 points 2 months ago

That’s going to catch some people, especially older ones.

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 22 points 2 months ago

Yet if I was helping my elders over the phone, I'd get all sorts of "What Windows key?", "I can't find that Control key", or "I did that key, the plus key, and then my hand slipped and I minimized everything."

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 24 points 2 months ago

Wouldn't it require elevation?

Yet another example of why running as root/admin is a Bad Idea©

[-] groet@feddit.org 72 points 2 months ago

No, why would it? It will run code in the context of the current user which is absolutely enough to start a new process that will run in the background, download more code from a attacker server and allow remote access. The attacker will only have as much permissions as the user executing the code but that is enough to steal their files, run a keyloggers, steal their sessions for other websites etc.

They can try to escalate to the admin user, but when targeting private victims, all the data that is worth stealing is available to the user and does not require admin privs.

[-] Womble@lemmy.world 58 points 2 months ago
[-] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 18 points 2 months ago

This here. The most important thing on your computer are all your session cookies, which are, well, accessible with permissions your user account already has.

Dudes don't care about making your shit into a botnet, or putting a rootkit in your firmware, or whatever other technically complex thing you care to think about: they're there to steal your shit, and the most valuable shit you have is sitting there out in the open for the taking for anyone who makes it past a very very low bar of 'make the user do something stupid'.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] RandomVideos@programming.dev 23 points 2 months ago

I cant believe they made captcha that only works on windows

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.fish 22 points 2 months ago

its not working, my krunner bind is windows+d

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ColdWater@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 months ago

I tried it and it's not working for me, my terminal is super+T and paste is Ctrl+Shift+V

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pewgar_seemsimandroid 21 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

ah, think this is like one of those survey scams.

[-] taiyang@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

I wish more people knew what Run... did, but the Ctrl + v should be a little more obvious. We need to teach more computer literacy if you don't immediately know that means you're copying text to something.

Especially on a shady site, mind you. But then again, this could be on a phishing email, so that's not always the case I guess. (I got one from "STARBUCKS" that Gmail didn't catch, their spam filter has been shit lately, blocking my work emails but letting through a lot of sus stuff).

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2024
1603 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59517 readers
2644 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS