334
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 55 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Is "it works" the average experience of an Arch user?

Edit: Folks, I know it wasn't clear, but this was rhetorical. I love the passion that motivates all of you to share your personal experiences - it's what keeps Linux moving forward... But you beautiful bastards need to chill.

[-] bali10050@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago

I say it's rather a „it mostly works” experience, but as a twist, if anything goes wrong, you can fix it very easily

[-] sxan@midwest.social 29 points 1 month ago

Base Arch can be fussy, but that's because there's a lot to set up, so many opportunities to forget things and only discover them later.

I ran Artix on a laptop for about a year; that was a constant PITA, although I still value their goals.

But EndeavourOS has been an entirely different matter. It's a "just works" Arch derivative.

I had so many fewer problems with Arch that I went through the effort to convert my 3 personal cloud servers from Debian to it. I went through a lot of work to replace thee default Mint on an ODroid to Arch, and it's been so much better. I put Endeavor on the last two non-servers I installed. So, yes, I personally find out far more reliable and easier to work with than Ubuntu, Debian, or Mint.

That said, I had dad install Mint on a new computer he bought because I had to do it over the phone and he never, ever, upgrades his packages, and almost never installs anything. If all I'm going to do is install it once and then never change anything, Mint is easier. But for a normal use case where I'm regularly updating and installing software, Arch is far easier and more reliable.

[-] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago

Endeavour is fantastic. I've been using Arch since high school, but hung it up for a few years until last year when I'd had enough of Windows' shit. EOS takes the PITA out of the install process (I just don't have the time these days to dig as deep as I used to), but is the same Arch experience in usage.

[-] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I've tried arch (and preferred Endeavour), but found both needed too much attention - If you consider "operating system" a hobby, they're perfect - the versatility is endless if you invest the time.

Personally, I want my OS to get out of the way and let me do what I want.

[-] sxan@midwest.social 3 points 1 month ago

I can see that, although TBH I almost never have to "admin" EndeavourOS. I just upgrade every once in a while.

Most important to me is being able to find and install whatever software I want, and I have a string preference that it either be installed in my ~, or be managed by the package manager. I really dislike sideloading software globally. And Arch does this better than most. AUR is massive, and packages are trivial to write and install in the rare event something isn't in AUR.

[-] Evrala@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I ran Arch flavors for a while, (Endeavor, Crystal, Garuda, and mostly CachyOS) and I eventually got tired of the tinkering, so I'm back on Opensuse now. Benefits of the perks of rolling release with less tinkering than Arch.

I personally use Tumbleweed, then I use Slowroll on my media PC and my dad's laptop.

[-] felsiq@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 month ago

Personally my arch install is almost boring me with how stable it’s been - and if anything goes wrong, it backs itself up before and after every single update plus on every boot just cuz, so I can roll back to wherever I want. I’ve put a lotta work into building out all these redundancies I’m happy with, and arch has been so goddamn stable I haven’t even had an excuse to use them. The process of getting a complete install was absolutely not “it works” - but now that I’m there, yeah, it really does just work. My only complaint is that I don’t have any reason to tinker with it more.

It is!

After some time
For some time

[-] Kyatto@leminal.space 12 points 1 month ago

I made a major mistake that bricked my system, all my fault, but I was able to plunge my arm into the smoldering pit it fell into and drag my install directly from the gates of hell. Still working great like half a year later and I now know not to do what I did before that broke it all.

[-] gwen@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

what did you even do lmfao

[-] Kyatto@leminal.space 1 points 1 month ago

I switched over to development/experimental package repos cause I was impatient for a new feature. I switched back to prod but I didn't revert my packages. It worked fine for a couple weeks but they eventually became to outdated and I couldn't post.

Luckily you can use a live stick to chroot in to fix. Felt pretty cool being able to do that, but yeah it was a stupid mistake lol. And I'm always gonna have a live USB on the side just in case I do something similarly bone headed.

[-] SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago

At the start yes. But it deteriorates with time. I can't even update because of dependency conflicts and whatnot. My system is held together by ductape and a piece of bubble gum

[-] Evrala@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Did you miss a required manual intervention on an update? A while ago there was an arch update that needed manual intervention cause of a dependency circle. Might be worth looking up the past year or so of manual intervention newsletter posts for Arch.

Last time I had a dependacy issue I was able to remove the conflicting package, update, then reinstall the package and it worked fine afterwards.

My own system was working great for a long while on an Arch flavour. But a bit ago HDR stopped working properly after an update and I just couldn't get it running right. Would display very dim.

Eventually gave up on my 2 year old install and went back to Tumbleweed.

I loved all the tinkering on Arch, but I just don't have it in me to do the tinkering anymore.

[-] derpgon@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

Just uninstall the kernel module that takes care of the GPU working properly, should solve the conflicts. You probably won't see the screen, so I advise to do a disk clone to a different PC and mirror your actions.

[-] SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

At this point i'd rather do a full reinstall. Would probably solve my other issues too

[-] weker01@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago

Yep. That's why I stopped distro hopping years ago.

Once set-up it just works™.

[-] muhyb@programming.dev 10 points 1 month ago

Basically like that but Frankenstein saying it.

[-] stealth_cookies@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

In frustration I switched from fedora to manjaro on my laptop and it has fixed almost all the issues I had even though fedora is the recommended distro by Framework. Dunno why but in all my time using Linux (even back to when netbooks were a thing) Arch based ones have consistently given me the least issues even though I'm far from an expert.

[-] naeap@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

I'm also happily running Manjaro on my new Framework 16.
Even the fingerprint sensor works fine - although I'll still need to tune LightDM a bit, so I don't have to press enter.

Do you have any tips what you have done further or any resources?

At first the WiFi wasn't working and is still a bit unstable - like isn't available as interface after booting and I need to toggle flight mode.
But it seems a newer kernel (6.10.6-10) mostly fixed it.

Also sometimes coreboot seems to take some time. But only every 10 boots or something.

[-] stealth_cookies@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Other than going through the guide on Framework's website I can only recall having to edit the config files to get the fingerprint reader to work with KDE.

[-] WreckingBANG@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

Since i use Arch everything actually worked. Scary.

[-] Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago

What's wrong with wanting a community supported distro?

Not sure why the hate on arch.

[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 26 points 1 month ago

The hate is towards the community members that spam "arch btw" and telling new users to install arch.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[-] bali10050@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago

There's no hate for anybody or anything, I just realised some distros have marketing, most have at least a pretty website, but for arch, you need to search for the download button when you want to install it, and the only thing that spreads archlinux is the word of mouth(or something similiar in the comment section), and this mostly involves spamming „arch btw”

[-] Ziglin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

There's a download option in the header. From there you just choose a mirror to download it from.

[-] bali10050@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I know, but I was comparing it with some other distros that have a giant download button in the center of the screen, that instantly downloads the iso

[-] nichtburningturtle@feddit.org 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Arch BTW mostly isn't serious, but I agree that arch isn't a good beginner distro. Same goes for manjaro.

[-] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Not sure I've ever seen an Arch user say that (not saying that never happened, just not anywhere I could've encountered it). It's a meme at this point.

[-] Floey@lemm.ee 17 points 1 month ago

Turns out having a value proposition beyond "we bundled a lot of software together that you can get on any distro" has allure.

[-] iopq@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

I use NixOS, FWIW

[-] superkret@feddit.org 5 points 1 month ago

Arch is so great, bro! The AUR has everything!
With yay, it's so easy, bro!
Update Arch
yay breaks
stays broken for days

Any other distro that had a broken package manager for 3 days, ever?

this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2024
334 points (100.0% liked)

linuxmemes

21197 readers
63 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS