183
submitted 1 month ago by breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca to c/world@lemmy.world

Western leaders should not be intimidated by Kremlin threats of nuclear escalation, the head of the CIA said on Saturday, and be willing to consider allowing Anglo-French Storm Shadow missiles to be used inside Russia.

Bill Burns, on a visit to London alongside the head of MI6, said the US had brushed off a previous Russian nuclear scare in autumn 2022, demonstrating that threats from Moscow should not always be taken literally.

“Putin’s a bully. He’s going to continue to sabre rattle from time to time,” Burns said. “We cannot afford to be intimidated by that sabre rattling … we got to be mindful of it. The US has provided enormous support for Ukraine, and I’m sure the president will consider other ways in which we can support them.”

MBFC
Archive

all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world 89 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I’m not worried about being nuked, necessarily. I’m more worried about our nukes becoming their nukes, by way of installing one particular treasonous orange asshole as president. Again.

[-] ravhall@discuss.online 35 points 1 month ago

I’m more worried about their misinformation and meddling.

[-] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Putler is [most likely] a sociopath. He's has no morals but he's not clinically insane. The only thing using nukes would guarantee for him is his own death, which he must certainly be aware of.

...if Russia even has any functioning nukes.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Putin also has grandchildren. I imagine he cares about a legacy. People like him usually do.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

I agree with your first paragraph 100%.

Re: your second, we know Russia has functioning nukes because, at least until a year and a half ago, we used to go and inspect them on a regular basis.

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

The inspections did not test nav, propulsion or detonation functionality. The inspections only confirmed existence.

Russia's weapons have been maintained by notorious black market scalpers for decades now. Nearly every gram of fuel, every PCB and every detonation component on the black market in the last 50 years has been from Russian equipment. The world's intelligence community has noticed and done a little math on the subject.

Coupled with the West's advanced defense systems, Russia poses almost no real nuclear threat to any ally at this point. Their delivery systems would be more effective if they were DHL deliveries.

[-] occhionaut@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Take the recent Chinese intelligence scandals coming out about their nukes having water in the fuel tanks and silo caps that cant retract. I believe wholeheartedly that corruption has stolen most of the nails from the thermonuclear hands in both Russia and China. Probably even NK too, to some extent.

Well sure, for land-based static and mobile systems, but it’s an open secret that the only division of the Russian military that has halfway-decent funding on a consistent basis since the fall of the USSR is their SSBN fleet.

I’m not saying that meaningfully changes the calculus imo, but if any of their shit is going to work, it’s probably going to be the boomers (subs, not the generation)

[-] gigachad@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

Putin is a gangster leading a mafia state.

[-] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Gas station was more appropriate 😁

[-] would_be_appreciated@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago

They said the same thing when he was repeatedly lining up troops along Ukraine's border.

It's not a problem until it is. They need to be making more progress on peace talks. It's unacceptable this war has gone on for this long and killed this many people.

Could be over pretty quick if the bully would fuck off back home and leave Ukraine alone.

[-] would_be_appreciated@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Agreed, but that's not happening. It's wild that the only possible options anybody sees right now are all-out war or Putin suddenly having a change of heart, and anybody who considers there might be other avenues to pursue is ridiculous.

Fine, the war goes on, and we'll see hundreds of thousands of people continue to die. Nothing else anybody in the entire world can do, it all rests on Putin changing his mind, and we'll just have to wait it out. Sucks to suck for all of those people, their families, and their descendants who are going to grow up in a country that's going to take generations to rebuild.

[-] InvertedParallax@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

Agreed, but that's not happening

OK, then we get to see which runs out first, the US military budget from 20 years ago, or Russia's military age male population.

My money is on our defense spending, and we have lots of video evidence backing that up.

Either he goes home now, or he just runs out of boys. Or Ukraine comes for him at this rate.

[-] would_be_appreciated@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

He will run out of people, at the expense of both Russian human beings and Ukrainian human beings. That's the best case scenario with continued war, assuming it doesn't escalate to directly include other countries.

[-] InvertedParallax@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

He's not going to stop till he is stopped.

The more aid and weapons we give Ukraine, the fewer Ukrainian and more Russian lives are lost.

Hitler taught us appeasement just rewards more aggression, we can't let this go.

[-] femtech@midwest.social 3 points 1 month ago

I would like the US to take direct action against Russia to end it. Like a single missile to blow Putin up.

[-] would_be_appreciated@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

This has the possible side effect of nuclear war.

[-] InvertedParallax@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

Then Putin should be very scared of that risk and withdraw immediately!

Or the Russian people should be scared of that and force him to withdraw.

Who am I kidding, the Russian people can't stand up to President Putin, they're too busy listening to General Stolichnaya.

[-] would_be_appreciated@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Then Putin should be very scared of that risk and withdraw immediately!

He should, but he doesn't appear to be. That puts the ball in everybody else's court, unfair though it is.

Or the Russian people should be scared of that and force him to withdraw.

Who am I kidding, the Russian people can’t stand up to President Putin, they’re too busy listening to General Stolichnaya.

A large number of Russians are trying to protest. They typically get killed or imprisoned. It's hard to fault the remainder for not risking their lives for a probably fruitless attempt at dissent.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

The ones trying to protest should escalate, cause clearly both the ballot boz and soapbox have become ineffective. Hell depending on how they do it it could be less lethal to them.

[-] InvertedParallax@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

He should, but he doesn't appear to be. That puts the ball in everybody else's court, unfair though it is.

It is in our court, so we should vastly escalate, both support for Ukraine, and we should start enforcing a no-fly zone.

During WW2, I don't think the Russians looked at the invading, brutalizing Germans and said 'well, poor things are being forced by Hitler, we shouldn't fight back'. And Germans stood against Hitler openly, they died for that.

Every day that goes by the cost for the Russian people increases. This is their country, they can take it back or watch it burn.

But the moronic belief that the west is weak and can't or won't stop them, it's the same belief Hitler had, and will lead to the same place, the utter destruction of their country, and the partition between the west and east.

[-] breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca 34 points 1 month ago

They said the same thing when he was repeatedly lining up troops along Ukraine’s border.

Who's 'they'? The US warned the world repeatedly that Putin was planning an invasion. They spent a month prior to the full-scale invasion herding skeptical cats in Europe trying to get everyone on the same page.

[-] Michal@programming.dev 22 points 1 month ago

What would be achieved by peace talks? Putin will dig deeper into the lands they occupy and get more time to rebuild their army and strike even harder. It's been proven that he can't be trusted.

[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 month ago

They need to be making more progress on peace talks. It’s unacceptable this war has gone on for this long and killed this many people.

Vatnik-tier opinion. No need to waste anybody's time on a serious reply.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Exactly: "more progress on peace talks" in this context is just a tankie dog-whistle for "capitulating to Russia's land-grabbing."

[-] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Peace with Putin in practice means removing his means of attacking

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Peace talks?! Hahaha

It is not possible for a conservative like Putin to enter any negotiation in good faith. Every word uttered by a conservative is deception or manipulation.

There is no negotiating with a conservative. It is simply not possible as their words mean absolutely nothing. When dealing with a conservative, there is only submit or fight. "Negotiating" with a conservative is submission.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

After all, Putin just wants peace... A piece of Ukraine, a piece of Moldova, a piece of Poland...

[-] InvertedParallax@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

Rather offer him a piece of lead, express delivery.

[-] InvertedParallax@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They need to be making more progress on peace talks

Sic vis pacem...

We are having peace talks, right now.

Every bullet we send, every Russian soldier we help kill, is us saying we will never stop until they withdraw every soldier.

They're Russians, they don't understand any other language. Crimea should have made that clear.

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Media Bias/Fact Check - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Media Bias/Fact Check:

MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Very High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

The Guardian - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The Guardian:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-guardian/
https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/sep/07/cia-west-russia-nuclear-threats-putin
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2024
183 points (100.0% liked)

World News

38956 readers
1464 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS