331
That’s it? 4 years? He will be out before next insurrection gala
The DOJ asked for 57 months. It’s not a good idea to tell the judge that you’re only remorseful because it didn’t succeed.
That’s a very light sentence for treason.
Except that's not what he was charged with, but nevermind that.
That's a mistake on the part of the prosecution, but it may have been made necessary because they couldn't prove that beyond a shadow of a doubt, but had the insurrectionist dead to rights on what they did get him for.
Sometimes, you take the sentence you can get. :(
Indeed. These babies should be happy they weren't put up against the wall like they probably deserve. Same with the people plotting the attempted coup being run at the same time.
Instead we hear about how they are "political prisoners" and so on. Well fuck that noise.
Would love to see some kind of therapy to help de-program his cult veil of what actually happened, and to work through why it's him paying the price right now instead of the cult leader.
No consequences for the assholes that started the lies to get their dumbass voters to raid the capital to overthrow the nation.
Why not? 4 years is only 48 months.
Really?
Most legal scholars agree that in order to charge treason, the US must be at war.
Sorry, missed the context.
The reason is the judge has a sliding scale for sentencing per guidelines. The DOJ tend to ask for the top of the scale. In this case 5 years. Because of the lack of remorse, the judge sentenced 4 years and 5 months. By being an asshole, this guy bought himself an extra almost half year.
Do you have a source on that?
Sure, the US Constitution, Article III, Section 3, Clause 1
That's not a legal scholar. This clause in the constitution says it's treason to "levy war" against the US, which one would imagine includes a large group of armed people storming the Capitol, regardless if the country is currently "at war".
I'm curious about the idea that "legal scholars agree" that the country itself must already be at war, unless that's not what you meant?
Since you obviously refuse to read it...
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
K nevermind then
Plain English not your strong suit?
4 years huh? Someone remind me how much time people serve for getting caught with pot?
Actually, don't.
no more than.
FOX “News” + the poorly educated + a shameless lying conman = Jan 6
The real tragedy is the main culprit has been given tacit approval by the $upremecy Court.
For the love of Pete, stop calling these terrorists "rioters".
Calling them implies that none of this was planned.
Sparks used social media to promote conspiracy theories about election fraud and advocate for a civil war. “It’s time to drag them out of Congress. It’s tyranny,” he posted on Facebook three days before the riot. [He and a friend] wore tactical vests.
Hard to argue innocence with all that.
Sparks added: “All it’s going to take is one person to go. The rest is following,"
He wasn't wrong.
ABC News - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for ABC News:
MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source
Media Bias Fact Check | bot supportSearch topics on Ground.News
https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/rioter-enter-capitol-jan-6-attack-sentenced-4-113191771
Four more years!
What bakes my noodle is: that this guy and presumably almost half of voters firmly believe that the 2020 election wasn't accurate. Factor in that like a third of the population doesn't even vote...
I don't know what that adds up to, but I don't like it.
Is it always like this? Does it matter? Idk, bums me out.
Based. He should be permanently barred from going back to the Capitol as well.
this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
331 points (100.0% liked)
politics
19087 readers
3196 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS