384
submitted 8 months ago by negativenull@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] VerilyFemme 165 points 8 months ago

Imagine you're stuck in space... and your two options for getting home are Boeing and SpaceX. Is OceanGate going to branch out into space travel next? I hope these brave souls make it home safely.

[-] ZapBeebz_@lemmy.world 136 points 8 months ago

As much as I detest SpaceX and the literal child in charge of the company, their craft at least has a track record of safely bringing astronauts to and from the ISS. Boeing doesn't even have that.

[-] felbane@lemmy.world 108 points 8 months ago

SpaceX is Shotwell's company, and she's way more capable of driving success than the fuckstick who does their PR. It's difficult to dismiss the objectively astounding leaps in technical progress that the engineers at SpaceX have achieved.

Musk could take a long walk off a short bridge and it wouldn't affect SpaceX's operations at all.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I know you all like to think that Musk does nothing at SpaceX, but that's not the case. He is heavily involved with Starship, and he was involved with F9 in the past. For example, landing on barges was his push, same as pushing to use stainless steel for Starship.

Whenever someone working at SpaceX says hes involved though, you all just dismiss it as "they don't want to lose their job"

Shotwell runs the day to day though, he's not involved with that.

[-] FundMECFSResearch 38 points 8 months ago

In business, just like in war, the few take credit for the work and will of the many.

We remember Eisenhower, not the millions who died and sacrificed their life fighting for him.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 14 points 8 months ago

same as pushing to use stainless steel for Starship.

Which he totally didn't do because he's a fucking moron who likes stainless steel, nooo this is definitely a sign that his contributions are meaningful

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] corroded@lemmy.world 47 points 8 months ago

I feel the same as you, but you really can't deny the fact that the engineers at his various companies have managed to design some really great tech despite their CEO.

Not just spacecraft either. Starlink is really the first usable satellite broadband, and Tesla has mastered the art of putting advanced powertrain in terrible automobiles.

[-] rtxn@lemmy.world 38 points 8 months ago

Those companies have people whose unofficial job is to manage the child when he throws a tantrum and somewhat isolate him from things that could be damaged. Twitter didn't have this protection.

[-] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

This. SpaceX and by proxy Starlink have Gwynne Shotwell to actually run things. Elon may be the one talking all the time, but he doesn't actually run daily operations.

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 13 points 8 months ago

I've read that Tesla and SpaceX engineers were actually happy that Musk bought Twitter because it's been keeping him occupied and out of their hair.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 13 points 8 months ago

some people don't realize that, despite politics and who owns it, they launch like 90% of the things in orbit worldwide. they are essentially the standard.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 52 points 8 months ago

I hate Musk but he is not the one who designed the Falcon rockets and capsule which have the best track record. I would much prefer to go on one of those than Starliner.

[-] VerilyFemme 4 points 8 months ago

Yep, I probably would too. Nobody's saying Musk designed them.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

Looks like they're not Boeing To Die.

Although, I gotta say, "Hard pass on that Starliner, I'm putting my faith in an Elon Transport Solution" really speaks to the deplorable state of American aerospace.

[-] felbane@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Except that there have been 12.5 successful Crew Dragon flights (one is still docked to ISS) and, critically, zero crew casualties.

I'd put my faith in Elon Transport Solution (that realistically Elon has nothing to do with any more, operationally) over Made By A Company Where Sometimes The Door Plugs Come Off Transport Solution any day.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

And F9 has the record for 363 successful consecutive launches, and more successful consecutive landings than any other vehicle has (edit: consecutive successful) launches.

The next behind them is 100 launches.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] superkret@feddit.org 8 points 8 months ago

It's a decision between a spacecraft that sprung multiple leaks on its first crewed flight and one that carried crew 8 times without issues so far.

[-] VerilyFemme 5 points 8 months ago

Oh I'm sure it was a well-thought out and easy decision.

That will not stop me from poking at Musk a lil bit. Just a lil bit. C'mon bro just a lil pokeage.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

At that point I'd take my chances with a space suit and a parachute. If I live, it would at least break the world record for skydiving height.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

That wouldn't work even a little bit. Not just because spacesuits aren't heat resistant so you'd burn up on reentry, but because they don't have enough ∆V to slow down from orbital velocity in the first place.

You'd be like Jebediah in my Kerbal Space Program campaign, floating around the planet without a spacecraft indefinitely.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 9 points 8 months ago

Did you think I was serious?

[-] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 8 months ago

Commenters Try To Resist The Urge To “Um Akshully” A Joke Challenge (IMPOSSIBLE)

[-] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Why would I resist? That's the fun part!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

I'm OOTL: is Soyuz no longer also an option?

[-] mercano@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago

Russia invading Ukraine has complicated any future dealings with them, especially when there’s a domestic alternative.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

They've been transporting American space personal since at least March

Not sure what could have changed since, but when US/Russia relations at some of the worst levels in history, I'm surprised this last lingering relationship has held out as long as it has.

[-] voluble@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

My understanding is that, in retaliation to US sanctions imposed at the start of the invasion of Ukraine, Russia stopped providing RD-180 rocket engines that were used in the Atlas V. My surprise is that the USA relied on Russian rocket engines to put national security payloads into space.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] yogurt@lemm.ee 8 points 8 months ago

SpaceX has a regular scheduled launch that's been sitting around delayed waiting for Starliner to leave the ISS, so kicking two people off it and replacing them with the Starliner crew is convenient and minimizes the schedule disruption.

Soyuz only has three seats and launching a Soyuz with only one crew or empty is something Russia hasn't done since the 60s and would be more work.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Oceans Gate 11, The Revenger. The first rocket 🚀 powered by match stick heads. But very safe.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

I always feel extreme tension during movies and TV if the scene is an oxygen leak from a space shuttle. Now I'm imagining that, but they have to repair things with their janky Xbox controller setup. Holding things upside-down, of course, because they wired the engines backwards.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 78 points 8 months ago

Boeing takes it in the nuts.

Not enough billions in taxpayer dollars I guess.

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 32 points 8 months ago

Thank goodness they're too big to fail or they might actually be held accountable for building such shit equipment over the last decade+.

[-] anubis119@lemmy.world 68 points 8 months ago

Of course they waited until Saturday to announce this while the markets are closed. Boeing will plummet on Monday.

[-] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago

Boeing will take a hit, but less than if the thing has fucked up during reentry and killed them ..

[-] AshMan85@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

even a worse case scenario, boeing will survive. i believe their bomber contracts are the golden goose.

[-] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago
[-] mynameisigglepiggle@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

Pretty sure those astronauts are actually whistleblowers

[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

This was the only option. Glad that they made it.

[-] jayknight@lemmy.ml 12 points 8 months ago

The nice part is that they had two options. They couldn't prove the safety of Starliner completing the crew test flight, but it's good that there are 2 commercial crew vehicles that they could have chosen. That kind of choice is what the commercial crew program is all about.

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

Okay so they are stuck then. Right?

Wouldn't it be interesting if they make it back safely on the X snap dragons capsule thing and then they bring back the boing capsule and it burns up? It mean, if nothing happens it's okay, but If it does!?

[-] CobblerScholar@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

I almost want to start shorting Boeing

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] realcaseyrollins@thelemmy.club 7 points 8 months ago

I'm surprised NASA is letting SpaceX help them. I thought they were gonna say "I'll do it myself" and twiddle their thumbs for a few more months.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 19 points 8 months ago

NASA doesn't have a vehicle for that any more since they killed the Shuttle. It's either the Soyuz or private vehicles.

[-] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

The NASA and SpaceX relationship is just fine. There's no real rush to bring them back, the ISS can accommodate them just fine.

This was always going to be the outcome as soon as there was a question about safety, regardless of what they said publicly. NASA has lost 14 astronauts due to poor managerial decisions throughout the Shuttle program. They don't want to get near that if they don't have to, and there have been alternatives since day one thanks to the Commercial Crew Program (and of course Russia/Soyuz if absolutely necessary).

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

NBC News - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for NBC News:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.nbcnews.com/science/space/nasa-astronauts-stuck-space-station-will-return-spacex-rcna167164
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
384 points (100.0% liked)

News

29393 readers
2854 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS