385
submitted 3 months ago by Silverseren@fedia.io to c/news@lemmy.world

As students return to college campuses across the United States, administrators are bracing for a resurgence in activism against the war in Gaza.

all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 168 points 3 months ago

Or, hear me out, we could stop selling things that kill people to people who kill people.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 100 points 3 months ago

In Texas, it's actually illegal for a government entity to do business with a company that boycotts Israel. Calls for divestment at UT and other schools can't legally be given any consideration because of our fucked-up state government.

Like: when I evaluate bids for the City, one of the sections I have to fill out by law relates to the bidder's stance on the Israeli government. It's insane.

[-] Hexbatch@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago

Also from Texas, this has been driving me crazy for years. At least they are now against international law now. Cold comfort

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago

That sounds like a blatant and extreme violation of the First Amendment.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yes and no.

It's technically a restriction on government, which makes it legally trickier despite being blatantly against the spirit of the first amendment.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

"Rejecting the bid isn't prosecution," that's some bullshit. Yeah it is against the spirit for sure.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

It's establishing a state minimum RFB. Just like requiring streets to be designed by PEs limits bidding option from those who are perfectly capable of the job from bidding because they lack the stamp.

So they're being eliminated for not meeting qualifications, not for their speech. Furthermore, they're usually eliminated from consideration by municipal, county, and school governments, who didn't write the rule. So the body that wrote the rule (state) isn't perecuting companies directly.

It creates difficulty in establishing standing to sue. It's the state's rule that limits the authority of the cities, so the anti-Israel companies have no standing to sue the state. But the cities also can't sue the state because they can't show damages caused by the discrimination since there's a thousand other bidders who can do the job.

The assholes in the Texas legislature specialize in drafting discriminatory laws that are difficult to challenge in court.

[-] myrrh@ttrpg.network 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

...i do a lot of work with texas municipalities and universities and all their standard contracts include a section forbidding us or any of our subconsultants from boycotting israel...

[-] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 16 points 3 months ago

Look. im from europe and even us havent figured that out(even in the not genocidal countries) but at least we dont send them money and weapons for FREE. At least our countries sell the weapons to genocidal countries.

[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 3 months ago

Thats almost the entirety of the US GDP. We're three weapons manufacturers in a trench coat pretending to be a government.

[-] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

That means no support for Ukraine either.

[-] Senokir@lemmy.world 31 points 3 months ago

While the comment that you are replying to does lack nuance, the intent is clear. There is obviously a difference between murder and self defense.

[-] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

You can support with food, medicine, and infrastructure. If we believe in killing something so dearly, we can send our own people. Harder to be a war monger if your own ass is on the line.

[-] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

Some of the biggest supporters of Ukraine are its neighbours in Europe. I think they have a good reason to believe that if Ukraine fell they’d be next.

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 104 points 3 months ago

Keep the kids from speaking out. Definitely a good look...

[-] queue 72 points 3 months ago

Revoking the right to question the war, that's awesome. It's cool to violate 1st Amendment rights when the good guys do it!

[-] TallonMetroid@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

1st Amendment only applies to the government. Unless these university admins are also members of government and acting in their capacity as such, then as shitty a move as this is, it's not actually a 1st Amendment violation.

[-] HenchmanNumber3@lemm.ee 28 points 3 months ago

Some of the universities mentioned in the article are public institutions. SCOTUS held in Healy v James that the 1st Amendment applies to public universities. So some of the actions could be considered 1st Amendment violations.

[-] orrk@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

Fun fact, the 1st amendment also applies to any organization or persons receiving money from the government (without it just being through sales ofc)

[-] queue 3 points 3 months ago

"It's not illegal so that makes it cool."

I personally find the ides that if you want an eduction, which is required for modern living, you need to abandon your rights as a citizen. Mandatary and needed public goods shouldn't strip you of your mandatory and needed rights.

Students have their rights stripped, especially as a child, because some Karens and Kevins didn't want to be a member of the HOA, they wanted to be a school board member.

Bags searched and confiscated, protests shut down, students having harmless objects taken away out of a nebulous fear of "could maybe do somethig in the future".

[-] Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I wouldn't say that's the sentiment expressed when people remind others of the limitations of freedom of speech. More like it's a reminder that knowing exactly where those boundaries lie because somethings aren't the government's job to mediate. Sometimes it's our collective job to resist because nobody is coming to fix it for you.

Realistically rights like the freedom of speech and expression are notoriously weak by way of actual protection by a culture. Russia technically has freedom of speech on the books but you can still be hauled off to prison for spreading "LGBTQIA propaganda". What actually protects those rights are the expectations and moreover the outrage of a culture's people against these acts of censorship regardless of who is perpetuating it.

[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 3 points 3 months ago

Who are the good guys? University administration?

[-] queue 9 points 3 months ago

The people pretending to educate citizens, then denying the citizens educating each other.

The people pretending that war is good when Your Favorite Team does it.

The people that act like murder is actually a complex issue.

[-] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 65 points 3 months ago

Because removing people's ability to peacefully protest and demonstrate has gone so well in the past and not escalated to less peaceful activity. /s

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 32 points 3 months ago

the us isnt looking like a democracy

[-] hark@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago

So this is the freedom of speech that the US prides itself on?

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

We love talking about giving everyone democracy. We just do it at the point of a gun. You’ll take our democracy and like it.

Now we’re pointing those guns internally more often.

[-] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You didn't see the asterick did you?

[-] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

signs cannot be displayed on university property without prior approval.

Fuck No

limits on the use of amplified sound

Fuck YES

[-] Hexbatch@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

The only thing that can stop an absolute mess on campuses is a cease fire that allows in food and medicine .

These rules are from hopeful admins this week

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Associated Press - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Associated Press:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://apnews.com/article/campus-protests-gaza-israel-hamas-war-columbia-b2321b9626e4a824f47cfce6b680e6d9
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

I know this source is garbage/useless because it rates the AP and The Verge exactly the same.

[-] PopShark@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Anyone else thinking about Ukraine right now? I am.

this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2024
385 points (100.0% liked)

News

23353 readers
2706 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS