1519
Firefox + Ublock = 👑 (lemmy.fosshost.com)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] HauntedBucket@lemm.ee 76 points 11 months ago

I am specifically waiting for this to happen so I can be part of the flood to Firefox when they finally throw the switch.

[-] cRazi_man@lemm.ee 24 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Why wait?

Also, Brave browser exists for those who are particularly attached to chromium.

[-] HauntedBucket@lemm.ee 169 points 11 months ago

I'm not touching brave with a 10 ft pole but thanks for your advertisement

[-] cRazi_man@lemm.ee 24 points 11 months ago

I'm just learning about what all the fuss around Brave is. But I'd be interested to hear how Google seems to be the ethical choice for a daily driver browser currently. It's obviously fine to not want to use Brave, but how is it the inferior choice when compared to Chrome (or even considered a sidegrade)? Even with all the issues mentioned I'd still recommend it as the lesser of the 2 evils compared to Chrome.

[-] ivn@jlai.lu 31 points 11 months ago

No one is saying Chrome is the ethical choice, why are you reducing this to a 2 options choice?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] tdawg@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

Lemmy always seems to hate Brave but no one ever says why

[-] majestictechie@lemmy.fosshost.com 160 points 11 months ago
  • shady issues in the past from company
  • heavily integrated with crypto (controversial for some)
  • CEO is a transphobe
  • it's still Chrome under the hood
[-] ivn@jlai.lu 126 points 11 months ago
  • CEO is also homophobic and a covid skeptic
  • the browser used to modify crypto exchange URLs to add it's affiliate code to it
  • it used to collect donations for content creators without their consent
[-] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 68 points 11 months ago

Why people always forget the simple:

Switching Google to Brave is not an upgrade is a sidegrade.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ivn@jlai.lu 28 points 11 months ago

I don't know, I've seen answers to this so many times on Lemmy.

[-] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago

I've seen this answered so many times it'd make your head spin, looney-toons style. If you don't know then you haven't been paying any attention.

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 11 months ago

brave is literally just chromium, it solves none of the fundamental problems other than being like, reasonably well built.

It's chrome, but if it didnt't try and kill you ever update. That's the difference.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] atro_city@fedia.io 70 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

While introducing opt-out tracking where you data is sent to advertisers. Get LibreWolf instead.

[-] 30p87@feddit.org 21 points 11 months ago

Or just set the few relevant settings manually, if you need nightly/dev edition.

[-] atro_city@fedia.io 20 points 11 months ago

Until the next dumb shit Mozilla does without telling its users.

[-] 30p87@feddit.org 22 points 11 months ago

Except I've heard about every change from here. And as I read the nightly changelogs, it's not that hidden actually.

[-] atro_city@fedia.io 10 points 11 months ago

Yes, you're the exception, not the rule.

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

If you need to use nightly, you're already the exception to the rule. That means you need to read the changelogs.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] VarosBounska@lemmy.ml 21 points 11 months ago

Oh I didn't know this fork, thanks!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 43 points 11 months ago

I’m really hoping Google’s antitrust case doesn’t kill Mozilla. Over 85% of Mozilla’s cash flow is dependent on Google paying for that search box.

[-] Scrollone@feddit.it 40 points 11 months ago

If Mozilla stopped paying his CEO millions of dollars... and if they actually financed development with people donations...

[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 12 points 11 months ago

We don't know what they pay their new CEO.

[-] Sarcasmo220@lemmy.ml 14 points 11 months ago

I don't think google wants to get hit with another antitrust lawsuit for web browsing, so I am sure they will figure out some other deal to funnel money to Firefox

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Good point. Could be like MS and Apple in the late 90’s. When Apple was on death’s door, Gates invested in Apple so MS would have faux competition for regulators.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 11 months ago

Mozilla's slowly creeping in the surveillance with adding integrated crap like Pocket and AI driven Fake Spot. I'm really glad Librewolf's made a privacy focused fork of their browser without all that nonsense.

[-] menixator@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Related announcement: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/privacy-preserving-attribution

TLDR: Mozilla wants your data and it's opt out. If you're on FF 128 it's already on and you will have to turn it off manually. Shame how they have fallen this low. The LEAST they could have done is show a pop up announcement when the user upgraded to 128.

Also: +1 to Librewolf. Mozilla is definitely going to try more scummy crap like this in the future. Definitely the better option over Firefox.

[-] nexussapphire@lemm.ee 12 points 11 months ago

Can't wait for ladybird to come out! Finally something that speaks our language.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] RadioFreeArabia@lemmy.world 26 points 11 months ago

I really hope there's a significant rise in Firefox -and derivatives- usage share. It will be good for everyone, even those stuck on Chromium browsers.

[-] NiPfi@lemmy.world 26 points 11 months ago

And in the meantime Mozilla keeps making worse decisions, too

[-] gdog05@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

Enshitification of all the things.

[-] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.one 10 points 11 months ago

Someone who gives a damn needs to be in charge of mozilla but i dont see that happening.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] SuperIce@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

Mozilla is about to collapse due to the Google antitrust ruling though.

[-] anachronist@midwest.social 12 points 11 months ago

Mozilla and its murder/suicide pact with Google falling apart may be the best thing that could possibly happen to Firefox.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 16 points 11 months ago

"And then Mozilla management comes in from the top rope with the chair"

Seriously, for profit companies should not own open source projects.

[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 10 points 11 months ago

That for-profit company is owned by a non-profit. They don't have shareholders to which they could pay out the profits.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Ascend910@lemmy.ml 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] foreverandaday@lemmy.ml 10 points 11 months ago

Manifest v3 was why I switched to FF a while ago - it was going to only be a matter of time even with the delays so I figured I should switch early. I still like how chrome looks a lot more and wish we had tab grouping, but google can take uBO from my cold, dead hands.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] mhzawadi@lemmy.horwood.cloud 9 points 11 months ago
[-] ivn@jlai.lu 27 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

That's not the same. DNS blocking is great but it can't block as well as a proper ad blocker.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
1519 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

51561 readers
983 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS