76
submitted 2 months ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/technology@lemmy.zip

Google Chrome is now encouraging uBlock Origin users who have updated to the latest version to switch to other ad blockers before Manifest v2 extensions are disabled.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 62 points 2 months ago

Google Chrome reminds uBlock Origin users to switch to Firefox.

[-] abcdqfr@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

Holds hole saw menacingly to own boat

[-] nothingcorporate@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

Google reminds people to disable Google Chrome

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 months ago

Firefox and Librewolf have problems. However, they are somehow better than Chrome.

[-] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 2 months ago

Don't forget other alternatives as well like Floorp and Waterfox.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

Not as private and Floorp includes proprietary components. I am not sure about waterfox.

[-] Onihikage@beehaw.org 2 points 2 months ago

Floorp includes proprietary components

That's out of date, they made everything open-source again recently as announced on their subreddit.

[-] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 2 months ago

That is not true indeed. As Onihikage pointed out the developer released all source code.

[-] 50MYT@aussie.zone 5 points 2 months ago

I have a hypothetical question on this.

If say, I had a crypto wallet via extension in chrome.

And unlock origin goes away.

I then visit a site I used to visit where pop ups were blocked

Malware gets installed. Crypto wallet gets drained.

Can I sue Google ?

I ask because I do have a tiny wallet that is via extension. Curious how someone with a much larger one on there would go...

[-] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Terms of service you agreed to when installing it protects them from all liability.

[-] 50MYT@aussie.zone 2 points 2 months ago

While I agree.

Part of me thinks it's like "we removed the seatbelts from the rollercoaster. It's now your responsibility to hold on"...

[-] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

That's why laws that mandate safety are important. Seatbelts on rollercoasters are mandatory, while tech companies can pretty much put anything in terms of service since they have enough of the politicians in their pocket that nobody outlaws it.

[-] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Don't think Google would be at fault there, at most it would be the fault of the website that served you the ad or the service that website used to serve you the ad. (Which could be Google but they wouldn't be at fault for not letting you block ads, they would be at fault for serving you a malicious ad)

[-] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 months ago

Luckily the one webapp that I have to use chrome for doesn't even have ads or tracking on it. I use Firefox for everything else, so uBlock will continue working fine for me.

Excellent news. Google needs to think up more creative ways to punish people for using Chrome.

this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2024
76 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

1274 readers
1 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS