444
KOSA passes Senate | ACLU: This bill would not keep kids safe, but instead threaten young people’s privacy, limit minors’ access to vital resources, and silence important online conversations for all (arstechnica.com)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by ForgottenFlux@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
26 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) easily passed the Senate today despite critics' concerns that the bill may risk creating more harm than good for kids and perhaps censor speech for online users of all ages if it's signed into law.

KOSA received broad bipartisan support in the Senate, passing with a 91–3 vote alongside the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Action (COPPA) 2.0. Both laws seek to control how much data can be collected from minors, as well as regulate the platform features that could harm children's mental health.

However, while child safety advocates have heavily pressured lawmakers to pass KOSA, critics, including hundreds of kids, have continued to argue that it should be blocked.

Among them is the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which argues that "the House of Representatives must vote no on this dangerous legislation."

If not, potential risks to kids include threats to privacy (by restricting access to encryption, for example), reduced access to vital resources, and reduced access to speech that impacts everyone online, the ACLU has alleged.

The ACLU recently staged a protest of more than 300 students on Capitol Hill to oppose KOSA's passage. Attending the protest was 17-year-old Anjali Verma, who criticized lawmakers for ignoring kids who are genuinely concerned that the law would greatly limit their access to resources online.

"We live on the Internet, and we are afraid that important information we’ve accessed all our lives will no longer be available," Verma said. "We need lawmakers to listen to young people when making decisions that affect us."

all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] queue 77 points 3 months ago

On why KOSA is an outrageous censorship bill that puts the power to control what you see online in the hands of dangerous people: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2024/07/kosa-internet-censorship-bill-just-passed-senate-its-our-last-chance-stop-it

On why KOSA is harmful to queer people, particularly trans youth: https://www.them.us/story/kids-online-safety-act-kosa-youth-lgbtq-content

On Marsha Blackburn's anti-trans intentions and what she feels KOSA should protect kids from: https://www.them.us/story/kosa-senator-blackburn-censor-trans-content (see also attached video clip)

On why it's not just queer people telling you KOSA is an absolute disaster: https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/aclu-slams-senate-passage-of-kids-online-safety-act-urges-house-to-protect-free-speech

Proof that the kids this bill purports to protect don't want it to pass: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2024/03/thou

And all but 3 members of the senate voted in approval: https://apnews.com/article/senate-child-online-safety-vote-f27c329679feb2d74787fc3887aa710f

America only has bipartisan support for hurting minorities.

[-] cm0002@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Who were the 3 who voted against?

[-] dhhyfddehhfyy4673@fedia.io 11 points 3 months ago

Rand Paul, Ron Wyden, and Mike Lee.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Bernie Sanders didn't vote against it?

[-] dhhyfddehhfyy4673@fedia.io 7 points 3 months ago

There were only 3 noes, so no.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

That's strange wonder why? Sanders normally wouldn't vote yes on something that would harm us.

[-] RadioFreeArabia@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Assuming good faith, perhaps he didn't fully understand the implications of the bill. You know how old people are with technology. Even good people can pass bad laws if they don't understand what they are legislating and the consequences of it.

[-] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

I mean if you could save face and vote no on a bill you know is gonna pass, wouldn't you?

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

IMHO those pushing such things simply hate ND people. All the rest is side effects.

And the reason they hate ND people is because they blame them for the 90s and early 00s where a lot of their shady behaviors were constantly exposed. Because in their opinion ND people are the reason humanity comes up with cures to that plague, of varying efficiency.

As in - that measure of chaos which makes engineered social hierarchies fail. Destroying lives of ND people in their opinion means that there'll be less chaos and their power will be more solid. It's the same as why fascists hate LGBT - they want "normalcy", predictable drones who don't question orders.

This, of course, strongly correlates with harm to most marginalized groups, because you are more likely to be part of one of them if ND.

Particularly being autistic it's easier to care about real good and real evil instead of your group being associated with good and some other group with evil.

If this seems an unhinged rant, it is, but it's also true.

[-] NutWrench@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago

Any time a lawmaker says they are doing something "for the children" you are being played. They are always up to something sh*tty.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 10 points 3 months ago

It's literally never about the children. When they say it's for the children it's because they're looking to lock in some crazy unpopular authoritarian bullshit and prevent any argument because who's going to argue against protecting children?

[-] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Children are legally basically slaves in the US (of their parents, or if they get married, of their spouse). They are almost never granted more power for themselves or more freedoms. Most "for the children" rhetoric tends to advocate for removing even more of their freedoms and power. It's really really sad.

Giving kids the right to vote would be a start in the right direction. No taxation without representation, and we have child actors and performers paying millions in taxes. They deserve representation. Maybe they'd change the laws so their parents (owners) weren't legally entitled to their money.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Giving kids the right to vote would be a start in the right direction.

I worry about that. More "Liberal" parents might care what their child believes, but hierarchy obsessed conservatives will tell their children who to vote for as they're "supposed" to always do what their parents say no matter what and without question.

Also just noticed, and love your username lol

[-] LucidNightmare@lemm.ee 16 points 3 months ago

Jesus fucking Christ we are still trying to roll this square up a fucking hill aren’t we?

Bill doesn’t pass? Try it again in a few months or years.

Rinse. Repeat.

I’m so fucking tired of the stupid shit my tax money is wasted on.

[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

I think this vote proves that the easy flow of information is what those in power want to prevent. Can't make money with people being too well informed.

[-] CaptainPedantic@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

I feel gross agreeing with Rand fucking Paul about something.

[-] Zorque@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Pretty sure he just votes against government doing anything. I doubt he's much of it.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

That would be a consistent position of a principled Republican, almost extinct species.

[-] Zorque@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Consistently douchey is still consistent, yes.

[-] ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 months ago

American "democracy" is a complete joke and the only reason it's been allowed to continue like this is because people are apathetic cowards.

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Apathetic cowards are why it's a joke. It'd work a lot better with more participation.

[-] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago

lol and it uses the DSM, which is intended to be heavily moderated by an expert's judgement every step of the way?

this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2024
444 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59517 readers
2795 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world