420

Antinatalism Rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)

submitted 5 months ago by BluJay320 to c/196

306 comments fedilink hide all child comments

(page 4) 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Oh boy, you guys are gonna love the global pension fund crash then!

Which shouldn't be a problem, but with how abjectly you guys reject AI and automation, it is gonna be a problem

[-] Killing_Spark@feddit.de 4 points 5 months ago

Valuing children only for the monetary value they will contribute is a very good way of producing unhappy children which in my view is pretty immoral. It's also pretty close to viewing humans as capital and that's problematic in it's own right

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (3 replies)

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 months ago

Ignore or assume we fix socioeconomics, environment, etc.;

Is having a child moral given the child cannot consent to being born?

(Not offering any opinion or trying to lead towards any answer)

[-] BluJay320 5 points 5 months ago

I would say it isn’t

load more comments (15 replies)

load more comments

this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024

420 points (100.0% liked)

196

16714 readers

2554 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Roflmasterbigpimp@feddit.de

qaz@lemmy.world

A_Very_Big_Fan@lemm.ee

qaz

qaz@lemmy.ca

A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world