421
Antinatalism Rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 9 months ago by BluJay320 to c/196
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Oh boy, you guys are gonna love the global pension fund crash then!

Which shouldn't be a problem, but with how abjectly you guys reject AI and automation, it is gonna be a problem

[-] Killing_Spark@feddit.de 4 points 9 months ago

Valuing children only for the monetary value they will contribute is a very good way of producing unhappy children which in my view is pretty immoral. It's also pretty close to viewing humans as capital and that's problematic in it's own right

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 months ago

Ignore or assume we fix socioeconomics, environment, etc.;

Is having a child moral given the child cannot consent to being born?

(Not offering any opinion or trying to lead towards any answer)

[-] BluJay320 5 points 9 months ago

I would say it isn’t

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
421 points (100.0% liked)

196

17478 readers
2151 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS