443
all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] DMBFFF@lemmy.world 103 points 6 months ago

from a forum I used to be on:

https://www.lushstories.com/profile/Magical_felix/forum (a bit nsfw)

According to the Supreme Court who ruled that presidents can do whatever they want and be immune if it’s technically official business, Biden can just blow up Mar-a-lago now and be done with it. No need to waste taxpayer money with elections and all that malarkey.

[-] audiomodder 62 points 6 months ago

I mean, it would ensure there are no more classified documents there

[-] Guy_Fieris_Hair@lemmy.world 38 points 6 months ago

That seems like official business to me.

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Gotta protect America's classified info from enemies right?

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 26 points 6 months ago

the easiest way to fix the courts is to appoint "all american citizens of voting age currently and any future citizen when they reach voting age" to the court - this means presidents would simply no longer be appointing people to the court. The current justices could still write opinions they would just be nonbinding without a vote of the public.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago

Maddow is possibly the worst person to get any kind of informed analysis from, maybe only a short and curly above Jimmy Dore.

[-] Captainvaqina@sh.itjust.works 42 points 6 months ago

What is your expert legal opinion on why this corrupt court just ruled to destroy democracy?

[-] anticolonialist@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I would place her below Jimmy Dore and on par with Sean Hannity

Edit sp

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I mean look at the downvoters.

No wonder this place is such a circle jerk, they learned from the goonlord edging queen Maddow herself, who single handedly managed to jerk off an entire nation about Trump's taxes returns, every night, for 900 days straight.

That's a supreme level of edging.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 21 points 6 months ago

All my bad takes that are downvoted are because of circlejerks 😠

When they're upvoted it's because I'm Mama's smartest boy and they recognize it

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 1 points 6 months ago

Yeah, I would definitely rather listen to someone that can't write or punctuate a single sentence.

[-] anticolonialist@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

The Liberal Sean Hannity has something to say

this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024
443 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19335 readers
1990 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS