335
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dudinax@programming.dev 57 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My job was broken in to. They sent a detective. He looked around and told us there was basically zero chance he'd catch the guy.

I found a cigarette butt outside. He said "It could be anybody". I said "nobody here smokes". He said "even if it's his, there's little chance it's a DNA match."

To his credit, the detective took the cigarette butt and tested it. There was a DNA match to a guy living in our small town who'd been in jail three times for robbery meaning the cops knew exactly who he was and what he did for a living but weren't doing anything to stop him.

When they went to his house they found everything of ours that he couldn't sell.

[-] Astroturfed@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Cops are just next level lazy pieces of shit in my experience. They average six figure salaries in most cities. They just fucking sit around and eat donuts. Act like your a piece of shit for even suggesting they do their jobs.

[-] redditron_2000_4@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Detective doing his job, protecting capital.

[-] ShellSurf@kbin.social 48 points 1 year ago

Really mind blowing how few crimes are actually solved. I've had real world experience of being a robbery victim and there was absolutely no attempt at solving it.

Someone told me if you have a problem and call the police, now you have two problems.

[-] Zana@startrek.website 15 points 1 year ago

I was robbed when I worked as a cashier. I literally did all the work and found the dudes name because he came in earlier and paid with a card and signed his name. Gave them his name and they didn't care. Nothing was ever done, I still see the dude walking around frequently.

[-] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

We had a guy come in for training. His first day. During lunch he left, slashed a tire on every car and smashed two windows.

We had him on tape and we had all his info because he was just hired.

Cops wouldn't do shit about it. Didn't even look for the guy.

[-] Zana@startrek.website 7 points 1 year ago

Yeah the dude who robbed me didn't wear a mask and you could clearly see his face on the tape. They didn't care.

[-] balisada@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Many years ago, before identity theft was a thing, my mom (who live with me), had our mail stolen. That day was the day that Oregon was sending out our "kicker checks", those are refund checks from the Oregon Dept of Revenue, and also the day that my mom's bank sent out her bank statement.

We found out because I got a letter from the Oregon Dept of Revenue that my kicker check was cashed at a different amount than it was issued. I did get a replacement, but I pointed out to the Oregon Dept of Revenue that the kicker check did have my social security number on it. They agreed and stated that will be the last year that will be a thing.

My mom fared worse, since she had a bank statement that was stolen. The thief went to an office supply store where they sold paper check templates and used the bank account number that the bank helpfully included in full on the bank statement, and printed out fake checks and wrote several at WalMart. To this day my mom is banned from writing checks there.

I never did get the police to care. Identity theft was not a thing at time. They flatly stated that they were not going to even write a report because I was getting a replacement check, so there was no crime.

That never did make sense. If my car gets stolen and the insurance company gets me another one, the thief, if caught, will get charged with something.

Cops will often not do jack shit if it means they have to actually get off their fat mattress and work.

[-] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Couple of years ago, I received a package from the FBI which contained a number of bank statements and DMV letters that apparently had been recovered in Florida, clear across the country from where I live. These were letters dated less than a month before.

Apparently the FBI were investigating some identity theft, and found thousands of people's mail and other identification at this place in Florida. And then they sent back the material to the various victims. Luckily, I never found any fake accounts or anything in my name but that was pretty crazy.

So apparently the FBI are still doing some work...

[-] Ryumast3r@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Next time something like this happens, report it to USPSIS, they're much more serious about investigating mail crimes (which this falls under since they stole your mail), and they don't fuck around.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

They've basically became untrained social workers who are terrible at their jobs. They spend lots of time dealing with mental illness and substance abuse issues and they think those can be solved with violence.

[-] iyaerP@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

They're a gang.

Full stop.

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

No, worse, they're an organized crime syndicate.

[-] WittyOriginalNames@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Not even that. Read the article. They spend 11% of their time responding to calls. The rest of the time they're harassing people which are 50% of the time minorities.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] irkli@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, social workers.

ON THE GROUND! NOW! DO AS I SAY!

Cops are also good at spending tons of money on stuff for themselves.

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

You forgot the gunshot. They love shooting defenseless people, especially if they're anything but white.

[-] snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

They spend lots of time ~~dealing~~ killing people with mental illness and substance abuse issues and they think those can be solved with violence.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Usually only if they aren't white. If they're mentally ill an white, they still might get roughed up and tasered, but they usually reserve the gun for darker skin tones.

[-] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

Why not just automate traffic violations and remove 83% of police?

[-] joyjoy@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Some cities have been sued for doing that. You can't face your accuser in court if your accuser is a computer.

[-] Spacebar@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Red light cameras, sure. It can be done fairly - not that it is everywhere.

Speed cameras just trap people new to an area. The people who live in an area learn to avoid them and thus they don't stop habitual speeders who are a danger. Plus they can't be everywhere.

The bias needs to be taken out of it. Police can't seem to stop themselves from racial profiling. Its like a compulsion.

[-] RavenFellBlade@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I used to drive truck over the road, and I can attest to the fact that those red light cameras can also be made very deliberately unfair. The city of Hannibal, Missouri had these cameras at the intersection of Highway 61 and Red Devil, at the bottom of a steep hill. About 1/5 of a mile up the hill south of the intersection was a pole with a sensor on it set to about 12'6". I observed that any time any vehicle over that height passed that sensor, the light would trip to red. And it was set at a distance that a loaded semi would be all but guaranteed to run that light. Those of us who traveled that corridor with any frequency knew the sensor was there, and would try to want other drivers over the CB, but a lot of drivers had stopped routinely using the CB by then, so the light proved quite lucrative. At least, until it started causing wrecks from the trucks jackknifing in the intersection in the winter. That setup ran for three or four years before the city was dragged into court over it and forced to remove the red light cameras, though it was done in such a way as to question the enforceability of the tickets and without ever directly acknowledging that the cameras were set up to entrap commercial vehicles.

[-] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Gridlock cameras can be added to red light cameras, also reducing congestion policing costs.

Speed cameras trap people new to an area.

Or they could just, not speed? And speed cameras can be everywhere. They cost up to $50k to deploy and collect to 2k+ fines per year (based in my location, this obviously varies wildly), so they run net positive. Rotating locations can also get after the habits of locals, though that's the 50k cost, I'd guess statics are cheaper.

If immediate reduction is most important than habit changing over time (i.e. a school zone or highway transition) speed linked red lights can achieve the effect. Such to say, if you drive over the limit, the light turns red. This forces you to stop and pisses off everyone behind you, providing social pressure. These are only in the pilot stage, so I don't know the real deployment costs.

[-] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But I want to drive 65 in a 30 zone! It's a conspiracy by the deep state agenda 21 liberal fascist police to prevent me from doing that!

/S

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

Tax collectors for the rich

[-] Zana@startrek.website 5 points 1 year ago

Behind the Bastards did a six part special on the origins of the police called Behind the Police. It is very good, highly recommend.

[-] salient_one@lemmy.villa-straylight.social 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

As anarchist Allen Thornton observes, “Police aren’t in the protection business; they’re in the revenge business.” Forget about Batman driving around interrupting crimes in progress. Police patrol does not prevent crime or catch criminals. When police patrol was discontinued secretly and selectively in Kansas City neighborhoods, the crime rate stayed the same. Other research likewise finds that detective work, crime labs, etc. have no effect on the crime rate. But when neighbors get together to watch over each other and warn off would-be criminals, criminals try another neighborhood which is protected only by the police. The criminals know that they are in little danger there.

Anarchy 101 by Bob Black

Here's an article about the Kansas City experiment on Wikipedia.

[-] Shadywack@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'll never forget this woman I worked with a long time ago. She was in a clerical type of position, but she had an absolute shit-stain of a miserable scumbag for a husband that was actively dealing drugs in the community. She broke down and vented to me one day about the whole thing and I told her she really needs to report it to the police, and that she needs to really do it for her kids to get rid of the exposure they had to the drugs in the home.

She eventually willed up the courage to report it, and I helped her get info from the local sheriff's dept and PD. They had a deputy and detective who headed up this team.

Long story short, she gave them everything. Dates, times, locations, and all the people to bust. She agreed to be a witness, and it was enough to take down a significant distribution ring. Nothing ever came of it. 5 years later her husband was arrested for a traffic infraction, and then he finally ended up in prison because he had ten pounds of cocaine, and 50 some pounds of meth in his vehicle. They never busted up the ring.

I remember the feeling, that the whole thing was just a dog and pony show. I was in my 20's but I learned way back then that law enforcement is a silly joke. Cops don't do shit for the working class.

[-] Spacebar@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Over the past decade, “consistently less than half of all violent crime and less than twenty-five percent of all property crime were cleared...

The response to a car break in is always, just call your insurance company. Imagine if they took it seriously and used forensic tools. Most car breakins are done by a small number of the same people.

[-] WidowsFavoriteSon@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Color me surpised.

[-] EvilTwin@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

The courts have ruled many times that the police have no duty to protect.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FrostbyteIX@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Kind of hard fighting crime when they're the ones starting said crime....

[-] MiddleWeigh@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Police spend most of their day inserting themselves into the everyday lives of citizens who aren't doing anything wrong.

I have a criminal record. Minor drug charges. I still get pulled over constantly, for zero reason, just so the cop can take a look and see if they approve of my hair clothes etc, and whether or not they wanna ruin my life...because they can, without provocation. Ever get slapped with a resisting arrest because the other charges weren't gonna stick in court? Happens all the time.

Fuck cops.🖕

[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

When i was a kid, I was weird and from a small town. I had no criminal record, gifted program at school, but I had a weird haircut and liked to walk to dunkin' donuts late at night because after midnight their donuts were on sale. This was enough to convince the local cops that I was one of the bad kids and, obviously, on drugs. Any time they saw me, they would stop me and harass me. It was the 90s, so the police could do anything to anyone as long as they said "Where are the drugs?" while they did it. You'll notice that nowadays the fashion seems to be to yell "stop resisting" or "gun" before they abuse private citizens without probable cause, but at the time is was "where are the drugs?" So, after a while of being stopped and harassed every time I left the house, I eventually got fed up and talked back to them. "Where are the drugs?" "The guy you're ignoring while you fuck with me has them". For that, I got my face busted off the hood of the cruiser a couple times before they let me go. They never found anything on me, because there never was anything on me, but being small town idiot cops they were sure that every time they didn't find drugs it was because I was really good at hiding them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

This article brought to you by "yet another thing we all already figured out years before the study."

[-] ParsnipWitch@feddit.de 14 points 1 year ago

Police in the U.S. is a shit show and other countries are following because they all reduce the screening procedures, psychological care and training time. But just defunding them, without doing anything else, will make it worse.

You propaply have to build up some completely new type of police force, break it up and fill important positions with new people and start again from there.

Otherwise this will continue to spiral downwards. And with increasingly bad reputation of police you will attract more an more bad people into the job.

[-] joel_feila@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

That's actually what one city did. They fired all their police, created new procedures for training and screening, amd hires all new police. During the months it took to do this they relied on country amd atate police, so there was very little poloce presence in town. The end result was people had more faith in police and no real change in crime, but fewer citations where issued

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

There are countries in this world where the police actually consists of a body of well-trained specialists. People who don't shoot first and ask questions later. People who got trained on de-escalation procedures, psychology, foreign language basics, how to deal with people having issues, etc.

[-] EfficaciousSkink@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Police in my town spend a significant amount of time at the scenes of car accidents. I wonder what percentage of their time?

Their priority should be on crime and accident response and prevention and I feel like it is in my small town. I don't know how this compares to police in larger cities, which makes studies like these valuable.

[-] 99nights@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Here in Australia, they are more like revenue collectors.

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

They do that here in America too. And it's not just traffic tickets. Go watch the John Oliver episode about "civil forfeiture." The TLDR is that while you are not entitled to police protection, the police are entitled to your money.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] halferect@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I remember calling 911 and reporting multiple gun shots across the Street. I was told it was probably fireworks. I told them I own guns and know what a gun sounds like, they told me I don't, but they will send someone, I waited and they never came. I wake up the next day and guess what they found a dead guy in the park that had been shot... They never came to ask me questions or anything even though I had notes on how many shots and the time and they knew who I was and my number and address. Cops are useless, I also was a victim of the cops getting the wrong address, I woke up to a bang bang bang open up! I opened up to a shotgun in my face cocked and ready to blow my head off. Only after they realized my house wasn't the same as a house on a different street did they stop pointing guns at me

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2023
335 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19233 readers
1947 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS