If you ever find yourself reaching for the phrase "unwashed masses" unironically, you're the baddy.
I actually think universal basic income is a very flawed idea from a leftist perspective.
It is effectively a capitalist compromise that still puts all of the asset holders in immense positions of power. The only difference now is they effectively are governmentally enforced as those positions of power. It will make the wealth disparity exponentially worse.
The answer to our wealth disparity is to put power in the hands of the average person.
Having the mass majority of the population trapped in jobs that pay just enough that they put up with it, while giving away all their time and energy to a corporation is exactly why the average person has no power. They’ve had the will drive to force real change sucked out of them.
UBI is a mechanism that can help them take back their time and energy to affect real change.
If they worked for democratic cooperatives and not dictatorial corporations they would have power to raise their pay and work less.
The answer to our wealth disparity is to put power in the hands of the average person.
Average voter: "Ugh, all the power and responsibility is too much work. Can't we just elect someone that takes care of all of this for us?" Congress/parliaments are born. "Ugh, keeping track of all these politicians and their policies and waiting for them to enact laws is too slow and tedious. Can't we just elect some sort of super politician that promises to take care of all our problems quickly?"
If the labor force could opt out of the rat race because they didn't have to work, then they gives them immense power especially considering what they have now. Of course the necessities would have to be controlled in a not-for-profit manner so that you can't just have some land baron that adjusts the cost of rent and food upward to ensure it eats up all the UBI, same with utilities/internet/etc.
But for consumerist goods that people want because they enhance life, if people could realistically withhold their labor unless the capitalist offered equity etc in industries that produced those things, you would quickly see the power of the leaders of those industries wane significantly.
Yes. All the free market economy guys are making assumptions about efficient markets and infinite choices, but none of that is true. But the reality is laborers don't even have the ability to leave a shitty job even with alternatives available, like just interviewing would use up a precious sick day or cost them hours of wage.
For most jobs in the US you'd be burning a sick day and losing hours of wages. Most jobs in the US do not pay you for sick days, they just don't use that as an excuse to fire you.
If only a few control the LLMs that write the news and run society in general, bad shit will happen even if 99% of the profits went back to the people as UBI or some other distribution method.
Not sure what the solution is, but if AI is to become the new means of production, it can't be entrusted to a few capitalists.
Obviously this won't be a problem once AI becomes self-aware. /s
I don't see how UBI would materially worsen the lives of the chronically ill and those who cannot sell their labor. It's essentially universal welfare that allows anyone to survive whether they sell their labor or not. That gives you the ability to leave a job that is exploiting you. Without UBI losing your job means potentially becoming homeless.
I'd say that it isn't far enough, sure. I'd also say that food and shelter should be considered universal human rights that everyone has to by law have access to regardless of their circumstances. Which would itself provide many of the same benefits as UBI.
As an anarchist and a socialist I'd change almost everything about the way the current world functions. But as a direct thing that would improve the lives of almost everyone, I am very much in favor of UBI.
I never said we dont need reforms. In fact the issue I have is Capitalism as a whole.
All UBI would do is give those who own the means of automation 100% power. What leverage would we have if not our labor?
Thats not at all to say what we have going on right now is not evil.
UBI doesn’t give any power to those who own the means of automation, nor does it take power away from laborers. Automation does that. Automation reduces the leverage of the laborer by reducing the capitalist’s reliance on labor.
We have the same leverage regardless of whether we have UBI or not, but the leverage of employers is reduced with UBI. That said, if more people opt not to work thanks to UBI, then the people who choose to work will see their leverage increased.
Not sure why you think there wouldn't be any more need for labor, unless you're thinking of some far future post-scarcity society where literally everything is automated. A UBI implemented now would give the working class even more power because they'd be able to actually use their labor as leverage instead of being forced to choose between working for shit pay or starvation.
Many governments have mandatory severance pay to prevent this. UBI is next level
Why not both? We're already at dystopian levels of wealth vs poor, let's make the transition easier on the poor.
The answer to our wealth disparity is to put power in the hands of the average person.
Pay people to vote.
At the very least we could make voting day a national holiday, so it isn't costing people money to vote.
Right now people are essentially being paid by their employers to not vote, and mostly just minimum wage.
I agree with the holiday thing but the worst paid workers don't get to take holidays off.
You're right, and many will choose to work holidays in order to make extra money, because minimum wage isn't really enough to support anyone.
Still, the government should be doing everything in its power to make voting easy, accessible and penalty-free.
In most of the democracies, voting day is on Sunday.
We should have universal basic dividand.
Yeah. My fundamental problem with things like UBI, reform/regulation, etc is that it leaves power in the hands of capitalists. Maybe in the short term you get some gains for a broader segment of society like during the height of union power in the US, (recognizing that even that was imperfect because of segregation) but in the long term capitalists can keep using their wealth and power to chip away at those societal gains. The only way to counter this while maintaining capitalism would be perpetual political activism, but that's simply not feasible. People need to sleep, eat, work, and live their lives. Corporations don't. They can hire lobbyists and lawyers to keep chipping away long after everyone else goes home.
This is one reason I'm especially interested in worker cooperatives.
You're right, people spend 8+ hours a day at work, strengthening business owners, who are essentially working against them. Then some small fraction of people have/take the time to learn about issues affecting them and volunteer a couple hours a week for their chosen cause.
Even those in a union are negotiating from the standpoint of "the company owns the equipment/processes/customers and we own our labor".
What if instead the workers also own the business? Now you're spending eight hours (or less) a day working on something that directly benefits you, and with which you're intimately familiar. It's possible to make democratic decisions because it's not some abstract issue or far away politician. And every successful worker cooperative reduces the money going to some micro-king, and in turn reduces the distorting effect of corporate money on our electoral system.
The answer (I think) it's not UBI, cooperatives OR more democracy. It's all this at once and even more.
UBI would mean everyone has a meal under a roof and has no fear of starting a business. Cooperatives put the value of the work in the hands of the worker. Free public universal healthcare and education systems with public affordable/free housing and public supermarkets makes everyone safer.
"Is a man not entitled to the sweat of his brow?" -Andrew Ryan, a very smart man who went to live under the sea and I am sure nothing bad ever happened to.
Would you kindly?
Unwashed masses? You look like a dirtier Seth Rogan.
As if he himself is not an unwashed mass.
Where the fuck do these ~~people~~ assholes think their "trillions of dollars" come from? People need to have money in order to spend it. If you put everyone out of work then theirs not going to be anything left for them to spend on your bullshit products and services.
The average middle-class capitalist moron view of economics is when you get rich the government fires up it's money machine and delivers you sacks of cash. The only thing keeping us all from getting our own sacks is momentary inconveniences and they too will be rich one day just as soon as they [fill in a thousand blanks.]
A billionaire has deprived vast numbers of people of something. You do not hold onto a billion dollars in your hand without the knowledge that some... or most of that would have paid for medical procedures, some of that would have been baby formula, medicine, overdue rent payments, gas to get to work for a struggling family, heat and water bills and so on. But you have found ways to skim that money from enough people that few notice. Because you don't miss something that was intercepted before it made it to you.
You simply cannot ethically hoard money.
That guy can suck my unwashed balls. But lemme go workout under the hot sun for a few hours first.
I mean, you can give us a bath first.
Lower daddy
I mean he's right. A system where ubi is just handed out to placate the unenpowered is a recipe for disaster.
We NEED real power, including economic. Why would your vote matter if the military doesn't need you, why would your purchasing power matter if you don't produce anything, etc. People may have intrinsic worth but intrinsic worth doesn't the levers of power pull.
Do you think that's possible to achieve? If all necessary labour can be accomplished by AI, where would this power come from?
Not gonna happen in our lifetime. But it's fun to think about i guess
I do think its possible but my bet is more on the probability that it will be leveraged to commodify and further alienate labor so that that power can be leveraged less.
The tools used to align the machines is where that power would reside in. A kind of church caste for the machine with the purpose of giving meaning.
Is it "Misanthropic CEO"?
Don't post screenshots of commentary of screenshots of articles
This is bullshit unworthy content all the way down
Man, rich people really think this way... Like, the wealthiest person I know is in my direct family, and this is how they talk every day.
Nobody even brings it up, they can't wait to shit on everyone that is less fortunate than them. The poorer someone is, the less they value them. It's so frustrating - anytime I'm around them, I'm just constantly trying to steer the conversation to a safe place.
Sure they do. My SO's ex boss was a multimillionaire who has a business that requires him to put money into it, as it's a long term investment kind of thing, and you'd think people were pulling his teeth out he fussed so much. Then don't have a business and sit on your ass all day and hoard your money. They're the greediest people.
He looks like a fat version of Zach Braff with Richard Simmons' hair.
He had me until the very last part of that quote.
you mean like they already fucking do already?
We're trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.
We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.
Partnerships:
/join #antiwork)