1217
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 49 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It's really amazing how much damage his loss probably did to the world.

I can't think of any pro-wildlife "influencers" that would be at his level today, much less wherever he would have reached in the remaining years.

[-] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 37 points 6 months ago

David Attenborough's narrations for nature docs, maybe? But that's not really the same as watching a wildlife fanatic like Steve Irwin.

He has a son that seems eager to follow in his footsteps, so maybe he'll fill that void one day.

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago

But getting that kind of popularity is like being struck by lightning, especially now. He had a very advantageous start on TV (not to belittle how amazing he was).

[-] FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago

In the anglosphere maybe, which most of Lemmy seems to represent. I come across countless legends doing the same work but without the same recognition. When Greta Thunberg, who I admire, became big I read an article about all the people around her age that have been doing the same campaigning. They were mostly indigenous people so nobody came along with a TV show for them.

load more comments (17 replies)
[-] Bye@lemmy.world 43 points 6 months ago

This is why I get so mad when people say “we don’t have an overpopulation problem, we have a resource allocation problem”.

No. There are not supposed to be this many fucking humans. Where the fuck are the animals supposed to live????

We need to return to preindustrial population levels so the animals can too

[-] FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world 24 points 6 months ago

Wildlife is now only 4% of the mammalian life on the planet, by mass. The rest is livestock and humans. https://www.ecowatch.com/biomass-humans-animals-2571413930.html

[-] Bye@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

If you had half as many humans in the world, but they all lived in suburbs, it would be much worse for the environment than having twice as many humans but they all live in cities.

Compare America to India. If Americans lived the way Indians do, the population would be absolutely fine. So if you want to solve overpopulation problems, stop the American style suburbs before you worry about the actual population.

[-] maniii@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago

Actual Indian here, please DO NOT live the way Indians live in India. The worst unplanned urban sprawl and urban density and squatting and squalor and slums :-(

If you are referring to the Ancient Civilization of local produce and local distribution and local Kingdom Tithes to the Empire while living in villages and the concentrating political, commercial and military power in the major cities. Education "institutes" in deep forest with no "fees" but labor for classes. Since that type of Civilization did once exist and thrived before being wiped out by repeated invasions and conquerors. Most definitely there were social and technology issues, but the slow pace of development did not destroy the landscape.

Medicine, Technology, Transportation, Global Trade need tempering with ecological ethical and sustainable standards of implementation, research and development.

[-] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 months ago

Yeah, I'm not idolizing the actual conditions of India, just pointing out an exception to what the person above is talking about.

My ideal society would be a solarpunk version of soviet block housing with tons of bike paths and trams and high speed intercity rail. Cars and meat would be banned, but everyone would have gigabit fiber internet and induction stovetops. Also the thermal and sonic insulation would be fantastic

[-] maniii@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

Soviet blocks are definitely better than urban sprawl when the maintenance and facilities are top-notch.

Taking the single issue of Transportation pollution, when India was in lockdown during covid, we had pollution-free skies, and lo-and-behold the regular rains and normal weather patterns not seen for more than 40 or 50 years returned ! Human transport pollution is the worst in India.

One of the first things Indian/foreign companies did was force workers to mandatorily return to office locations which increases transportation pollution by the bazillions as vehicles are needed to shuttle people, materials and maintenance for everything. And all these corporations talk the big talk of how ESG they are.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 6 months ago

Why? Who decided that there aren't supposed to be this many humans? We just need to accept that humans exist and work with that. Unless your solution is genocide and mass sterelization. And historically, richer nations paradoxically breed less, which is pretty unnatural IMO but seems like the solution to overpopulation: feed and educate.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Muscar@discuss.online 23 points 6 months ago

"Our wildlife"

It's not ours, just like the planet isn't.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 21 points 6 months ago

The flag I shoved into this penguin says otherwise.

[-] Obi@sopuli.xyz 5 points 6 months ago

Your flag might spell "otherwise" but this piece of evidence below says something else!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

it is the same thing as saying my community/our community/my class/my girl/boy friend/ my favourite cafe/my dad etc. Does not necessarily mean you own it, just a short hand way of expressing a more abstract form of relationship than physically owning something.

[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 21 points 6 months ago

Cold uncaring universe MFers realizing we are not separate from the universe and are, in fact, the universe itself observing, bettering, and caring about itself.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] alphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works 17 points 6 months ago

I miss Steve

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago

I wish I could get the joy out of picking up an animal turd that Steve Irwin had. Every time I walk the dogs.

[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Crikey, she's a beaut.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Evolution just needs to kick the rest of the animals into high gear and do some defcon 1 shit, like making seaguls venomous and thirsty for human blood, or inventing funnel-webbed Taipans that can fly and open doors. New airborne bacteria that feeds exclusively on the human optic nerve, and daffodil pollen that causes category 5 cytokine storms.

Level the fucking playing field.

[-] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

plastic eating bacteria seems to be on its way atleast

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] v4ld1z@lemmy.zip 11 points 6 months ago
[-] UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev 23 points 6 months ago

Eating meat is very much a part of nature, if you're implying he would be a hypocrite for eating meat

[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 6 months ago

There's nothing natural about our food production, specially meat production.

[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago

What is natural? There's animals that dig into other animals brains and eat them slowly. There's animals that paralyze their victims and eat them slowly. There's parasites that infect their host and force them to get eaten by controlling them and removing their fear center. There's animals that eat their own young. There animals that only eat the young of others.

This notion that nature isn't cruel and unforgiving is just a fairytale.

The amazing thing about humans is that we can actually feel compassion for others, even other species and strive to reduce their suffering as much as possible. I'm really getting tired of people being so negative all the damn time.

Our food production needs to do better and be better but it will only do so because of us, not because we "listen to nature" or whether else people love to spew out trying to sound enlightened.

[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 6 months ago

I was directly responding to the previous commenter saying that it's natural to hunt and eat. Our current system of industrial farming of animals is inhumane for both animals and farmers. Nature might be unforgiving and metal, but we have brought the unnecessary torture of sentient animals to unholy levels.

That's what I meant with my comment.

load more comments (17 replies)
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

What is natural?

There are certain ecological balances that develop over time, as species fill individual niches and create symbiotic bonds. The capacity for the given biome to support life is predicated on a certain cyclical exchange. And when that cycle is broken, you typically see a die-off caused by the imbalances.

This notion that nature isn’t cruel and unforgiving is just a fairytale.

The question isn't of cruelty but sustainability. The mouse eats the corn. The snake eats the mouse. The bird eats the snake. The parasite eats the bird. The corn eats the corpses.

But if you go through with a weed wacker and kill all the snakes, you get population spikes on one end of the food chain and collapses on others, in a way that ultimately reduces the amount of life the area can support.

We saw this across the American Great Plains with the extermination of buffaloes and passenger pigeons. What was once lush and bountiful became barren and inhospitable, as industrial scale destruction of natural resources rendered territory uninhabitable. Reckless industrial development produces waste faster than the natural ecological conditions can process it. And this same development siphons off the natural bounty faster than it can be replaced.

Our food production needs to do better and be better but it will only do so because of us, not because we “listen to nature”

If we do not understand why certain natural cycles exist or how certain minerals and molecules are naturally derived and regenerated or what energy sources are available and at what rates, we risk exhausting the existing biological landscape and destroying the capacity for a particular piece of territory to sustain new life in future generations.

This is as simple as looking at the Great Lakes or the Ogallala Aquifer or the Mississippi River and asking "Is there going to be enough water in these places in another 100 years to maintain our productive rate of agricultural development?" And at the current rate we're exhausting these resources, the answer is no.

If we hadn't brought in so many thirsty commercial scale animal and plant species or attempted to generate such large surpluses that we could export them overseas at enormous profits or raised the temperature of the Earth such that we evaporated off too much surface water, we would not be in this situation.

trying to sound enlightened

You don't need to be a guru to look at the Earth and look at Mars, then say to yourself "Maybe we keep the Earth-style ecology going a little longer".

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev 14 points 6 months ago

I never made a comment about that?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 11 points 6 months ago

But since we shape our own environment, we are guest and shouldn't be everywhere on the planet.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Fortunately, there's enormous swaths of the planet that are totally inhospitable to human life.

Unfortunately, we've managed to deposit all sorts of toxic waste from the depths of the ocean to the hottest corners of the desert to the peaks of mountains.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] leaveWitX@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

Humanity’s ability to repair and control is far from being able to keep up with its destructive power

[-] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 6 months ago
[-] Enzy@lemm.ee 7 points 6 months ago

Absolute Legend.

Rest in peace.

[-] PythagreousTitties@lemm.ee 7 points 6 months ago

Everyone in here acting like farming and livestock hasn't been the cornerstone of human population since 400k years ago...

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Marthirial@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

So deep. Now watch how I manhandle this croc for your chortling entertainment.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] stringere@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago

Love it to (your) death, Steve.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

We do not own her, and she does not own us. Mother Earth made us out of spite, to be constantly challenged, until we are let loose on an unsuspecting universe. Her peers scorned her, so she has given us one trial after another to make us as resilient, and eternal, as she is. Soon we will leave our cradle carrying our mother's wisdom, and wrath, with us. Woe to all that seek to oppose us, for we have been tempered in a deathworld crucible. Blessings to all that are neutral, or join in our crude attempts to make a better galaxy and universe.

Oh and those of us that stay behind shall finally tame our mother, and make her into her final form of a true Gaia planet.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2024
1217 points (100.0% liked)

Lemmy Be Wholesome

7068 readers
15 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Be Wholesome. This is the polar opposite of LemmeShitpost. Here you can post wholesome memes, palate cleanser and good vibes.

The home to heal your soul. No bleak-posting!

Rules:


1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. No NSFW Content


-Content shouldn't be NSFW

-Refrain from posting triggering content, if the content might be triggering try putting it behind NSFW tags.


7. Content should be Wholesome, we accept cute cats, kittens, puppies, dogs and anything, everything that restores your faith in humanity!


Content that isn't wholesome will be removed.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Mildly Infuriating

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Jokes

7.Credible Defense

...

Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS