77
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] testuserpleaseupvote@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago

Ok, neat, but I wonder what's the conclusion. Should I understand more more money equals better education or that more math education equals more money?

I'd wager it's the first one, since inequality sucks. Also, that oil beats schooling, looking at the bottom right corner.

[-] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

The best we can say for that chart is that there is some relation (not necessarily casual) between GDP and mathematical education levels.

The causal factor could be anything - but it's a damn pretty curve. It at least suggests that measuring a country's gdp can give you a ballpark figure for it's mathematical education levels.

Might be a novel premise for funding to explore if math is a causal factor.

[-] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 months ago

There's probably a better number than GPD/pop, considering the big outliers have exceptional inequality or equality in vietnam's case.

There's probably a much better line between median (or even better yet, first quartile) education funding and math scores, and a similar correlation to OP between GDP and education funding.

[-] Blaze@reddthat.com 3 points 4 months ago

Feel free to create a post with the better numbers if you have them!

[-] ElderWendigo@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 months ago

Why is China listed multiple times as individual cities/regions?

What is the missing footnote for all those asterisks?

[-] candybrie@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Hong Kong and Macau are weird in that they're part of China but have a different government and separate economic system. They're both former European colonies that were "given" back relatively recently. I don't see the main part of China on the graph, but maybe I just missed it.

[-] Blaze@reddthat.com 3 points 4 months ago

Here is the source: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2022-results-volume-i_53f23881-en

For the asterisk:

  • Caution is required when interpreting estimates because one or more PISA sampling standards were not met (see Reader’s Guide, Annexes A2 and A4). Long-term trends are reported for the longest available period since PISA 2003 for mathematics, PISA 2000 for reading and PISA 2006 for science. The OECD average does not include Costa Rica and Spain for short-term change in performance.

I'm looking for China, IIRC they only allowed Hong Kong and Macao to participate, the rest of China did not

"Chinese Taipei"

You (the author, not OP) mean Taiwan?

[-] littleme@infosec.pub 1 points 4 months ago
[-] Blaze@reddthat.com 4 points 4 months ago

Very high GDP per capita due to large tech companies having their European HQ there to avoid taxes

this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2024
77 points (100.0% liked)

Data is Beautiful

1157 readers
1 users here now

Be respectful

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS